Tags
Religion without dogma made no sense to Newman; without that it was “mere sentiment” – and that was a foundation of sand. But he was well aware of the limits of humanity and acknowledged that the application of the intellect to religious matters might well produce a diminution of faith. It was, he commented, as though it was assumed that theologians were “too intellectual to be spiritual” and thus “more occupied with the truths of doctrine than with its reality.”
For Catholics the Church is the rock upon which dogma rests; we accept the historical reality of the Revelation it transmits to us. But intellect alone will not suffice; that is where prayer and devotional practices are needed; we do not worship by brain-power. For Newman,“Revealed religion should be especially poetical – and it is so in fact.” Prose was inadequate to convey the Truth of revealed religion, but, without an Authority to pronounce on revelation and tradition, private judgement would simply lead to the sort of chaos he came to discern within the Church of England in his own day. Thus, the mixture of light and dark in the quotation which heads up this essay.
Although we are each the subject of our own experiences, and whilst Christ came to save each of us, our egos are but a vehicle when it comes to understanding that Christ Himself is at the centre of our Faith. The central truth of the Christian Faith is the Incarnation. God became man and died that we should have eternal life. And yet knowing this, we can, nonetheless, in times such as this lose sight of this and, in despair, wonder why God is silent in the face of our prayers for healing and safety.
Much prose has been given over to the problem of why God allows mankind to suffer – the technical term is theodicy. But the intervention which speaks most to my heart is the poem, “Denaill” by George Herbert:
When my devotions could not pierce
Thy silent ears;
Then was my heart broken, as was my verse:
My breast was full of fears
And disorder
This is no intellectual exercise, it is the heart-felt anguish of the poet who agonises at what he feels is God’s refusal of his prayerful requests. He feels abandoned, as though his soul has no mooring. It is only in close reading that we see that the poet is, himself, in “denial”. Each stanza concludes with a last line which does not rhyme – except for the last one which concludes:
O cheer and tune my heartless breast,
Defer no time;
That so thy favours granting my request,
They and my mind may chime,
And mend my rhym
Which, of course, is a rhyme. God has answered, it is the poet who has been in denial. God’s answer may not be the one we expect; it maybe that we are not listening.
We are made in God’s image; but we are not God. How much we long for a God whom we can understand, as well as worship, how often we think that God is absent; but how often to we think that it is we who are absent, we who are deaf?
T.S. Eliot, as so often, expresses it best in the first part of Little Gidding:
If you came this way,
Taking any route, starting from anywhere,
At any time or at any season,
It would always be the same: you would have to put off
Sense and notion. You are not here to verify,
Instruct yourself, or inform curiosity
Or carry report. You are here to kneel
Where prayer has been valid. And prayer is more
Than an order of words, the conscious occupation
Of the praying mind, or the sound of the voice praying.
And what the dead had no speech for, when living,
They can tell you, being dead: the communication
Of the dead is tongued with fire beyond the language of the living.
Here, the intersection of the timeless moment
Is England and nowhere. Never and always.
We have to put away our worldly concerns. Our intellects can rest secure on the rock of the dogma proclaimed by the Church. What should concern us is prayer, and even the best of prayers is but the antechamber to our encounter with God. We intersect with the past and the present, the living and dead, and above all with Him whose Kingdom shall have no end.
God is not silent; we lack the ears with which to hear Him if we think so.
“God is not silent; we lack the ears with which to hear Him if we think so.”
Amen, to that John. Does God speak through unlikely coincidences? It begs an answer:
Covid-19 following on the heels of Event 201 and finally, successfully, silencing Catholicism after 2000 years : https://www.barnhardt.biz/2020/04/03/event-201-there-is-no-way-in-hell-that-this-is-a-coincidence/
Bergoglio greeted with lightening striking St. Peter’s: his desire to be called the Bishop of Rome rather than Pope, his living apart from the Vatican (which like having the Pope’s bed, if not the Throne, has two possible occupants but none that refuse or cannot occupy). Then he denies hell, worships the idol Pachamama, folds under the weight of BXVI’s remarks on married priests, and recently denounces the title Vicar of Christ: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pope-francis-drops-vicar-of-christ-title-in-vatican-yearbook
Let those with ears hear. It may indeed be twilight and truths and lies mixed (the light and the dark). It may be a time when we can believe nothing we hear but only half of what we see as Edgar Allan Poe once put it. But it may be that God has delivered us answers which are plain to see if we do not want to believe half truths or confused truths.
Perhaps God’s miracle will come when we turn once again to Him and demand that the worldwide authoritarianism ends and that we will not worship the desires of the UN, or The Who, or any other globalists . . . even if they are acclaimed by many to be the Voice of God on earth. For the first time, the Elitist World and the Church claim to be the Truth and can be followed as though the Holy Ghost Himself has informed their joint collective Wisdom: both secular and spiritual.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe the questions we need to ask ourselves at this time is this:
Is the Unity of the World Elite with the Church of Rome a marriage forged in Heaven or a marriage forged in Hell (which does not exist of course)? Will we willingly, of our own accord, go quietly into captivity or do we refuse even the hirelings and wolves in sheep’s clothing and remain in God’s Temple? Was the Urbi et Orbi this year a vision of the emptiness into which we have, like sheep to the slaughter, been led?
LikeLike
More on Bergolio’s abandonment of the title Vicar of Christ by Vigano: https://remnantnewspaper.com/web/index.php/articles/item/4837-vigano-on-2020-pontifical-yearbook-did-pope-francis-abandon-the-title-vicar-of-christ
LikeLike
I leave others to say what they hear; but that He speaks I have no doubt.
LikeLiked by 2 people
As do I. But it is sad when what we rely on for guidance is 180 degrees opposed to one another which seems to be the case these days. Now that we have seemingly become friends with the world, the flesh and the devil where one easily mistakes the him for anyone who still believes in the ancient trinity of enemies of the Church and our spiritual life.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I liked this piece very much. I have often had cause to struggle with these questions as you know from the role that Romans played in my own conversion. And that phrase, “where prayer has been valid” has haunted me ever since I came across it on this blog (I have not had much exposure to TS Elliot, but some exposure to Herbet and Donne).
What strikes me is the ambiguity of the word on more subtle analysis. In common use today it means “correct”, “licit”, “appropriate”, but its root in Latin means “strong”. Where prayer has been both correct and therefore effective,
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed – and Eliot reminds us of the importance of surrendering ourselves in prayer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The other thing that strikes me on reading this piece is the “many flowers but one garden” idea. One half of me longs for a restored Church of England that has the best elements from all its incarnations: the beauty of its last days of Catholicism in the reigns of Edward IV, Richard III, and Henry VII; the sobriety of its Enlightenment years; the evangelical zeal and patriotic fervour of its 19th century time; and that quiet use of the gifts of the spirit that has been found at various times (indeed, one might say that the Spirit was moving in the writings of churchmen like Herbert). But to meld all of that together is both impossible and contrary to conscience. We cannot force Christians of different stripes to be what they are not and we have learned from history that tragedy ensues when we try. I do not think even Catholicism can manage this – but we can strive for that grace to accept each other’s consciences.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This, for many, so you are far from alone, Nicholas, is a vexing question. How easy (which is why it is done so often) it is to insist that “we” alone have the fullness, but even within the Catholic Church there are many traditions and Rites.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I wish now that I had understood certain things better during previous years. I might have appreciated more the opportunity for a different kind of spirituality that my Anglo-Catholic chapel offer at university or the chance to speak with my chaplain about matters in addition to the small group leaders at the charismatic, evangelical church I attended. All have value, and I was too arrogant to see it, caught in a conservatism at all costs mindset. Still, I suppose I can thank God that He continues to offer his grace: I have been presented with opportunities since those days and perhaps, if not grown as much as I would like, some small progress has been made. My sympathy to you at this time in the absence of the sacraments. But I am glad that you have calls from your priest and the presence of God through prayer and the rosary.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We learn as we can, Nicholas. So much that I think I see now, I wish I had seen years ago, but perhaps that was not meant to be. In the learning there is, itself, a learning, if that makes sense?
LikeLiked by 1 person