• Home
  • About
  • Awards
  • Dialogue with a Muslim: links
    • 1st response
    • Second response
    • Final response
  • Saturday Jess

All Along the Watchtower

~ A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you … John 13:34

All Along the Watchtower

Tag Archives: Catholic

2021: Year of Hope

03 Sunday Jan 2021

Posted by cath.anon in Catholic Tradition, Christmas, Faith

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Solemnity, Tradition, Virgin Mary

This past year, 2020, has felt like one enormous Lenten season. I know that is not technically accurate, but it seems Easter came and went with hardly a ripple. We have all been slogging through month after month of lockdowns and restrictions.

It has also been a time of reflection for me. What am I doing with my life? How is my family? How is my spiritual life? Is God pleased with where I am heading?

All of these questions are characteristic of Lent. It seems like even in 2020’s Ordinary time and Easter season, God was trying to pull us all back to deeper meditation on what it is we are doing individually, communally, and even globally.

But yesterday was different for me, maybe for the first time in months. In the Catholic calendar, January 1st is the Solemnity of Mary, the Holy Mother of God.

Over Christmas, I could not be at Mass. My wife had tested positive for Covid the week before (no symptoms, she’s just fine, thankfully). So we all quarantined over Christmas Eve, Christmas, and any other Masses we might have been able to go to. But our quarantine ended Wednesday this last week.

So I sat outdoors with my parish at Friday’s Mass, seeing some faces I haven’t seen for weeks, others months. I was cantoring, and legally speaking, I am supposed to be singing alone. But we have a rebellious parish, and everyone joined in anyway, probably because they were Christmas songs. How can you not join in singing a Christmas song?

January 1st fell on Friday this year. And just like Lent has it’s own set of weeks, Fridays are set aside in the Catholic calendar as days of sorrow. We are meant to think on that Good Friday and fast from something – maybe meat or coffee, whatever is a sacrifice for us. Lent is a special time to do this, but really, Catholics are encouraged to make every Friday a little Lent.

But Feast Days trump these sad Fridays. Despite it typically being a day of sorrow and mourning, the church, in the providence of God, called us to celebrate instead. Mary is our mother which means Jesus, the Son of God, is our brother.

I am no prophet, but I think that’s a fantastic omen for the coming year. We’ve all gone through an extended season of Lent. I’m not ready to call 2021 an “Easter Year”. But on the Feast Day of a mother and child who brought light to a very dark world, I refuse to call 2021 another year of Lent.

I choose to call it a year of hope.

©2021 Catholic Anonymous

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Martin Luther King Day

21 Monday Jan 2019

Posted by Neo in Faith, Homilies

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Baptists, Catholic, Faith, Lutheran, MLK Day, Rev Dr Martin Luther King, sermons

Today is Martin Luther King Day in the United States, In that spirit, I offer you a sermon of the Baptist M.L. King as presented by Msgr. Charles Pope of the Archdiocese of Washington.

Among his recorded sermons is one in which Dr. King addressed the problem of unbelief, of materialism and atheism. His reflections are well worth pondering today because the problem is even more widespread now than it was when he made these remarks in 1957. A complete transcript of the sermon is available here: The Man Who Was a Fool.

In this sermon, Dr. King commented on Jesus’ parable of the wealthy man who had a huge harvest and, instead of sharing it, just built bigger barns to hold the excess. The Lord called him a fool for thinking that his material wealth could provide security.

Following are excerpts from this sermon, with Dr. King’s words shown in bold, black italics and my comments displayed in plain red text. After discussing several reason why the man was a fool, Dr. King said,

Jesus [also] called the rich man a fool because he failed to realize his dependence on God. He talked as though he unfolded the seasons and provided the fertility of the soil, controlled the rising and the setting of the sun, and regulated the natural processes that produce the rain and the dew. He had an unconscious feeling that he was the Creator, not a creature.

Having discovered the inner realities of many processes, the materialistic atheist fails to ask more fundamental questions such as “Where does the cosmos ultimately come from?” and “What is the ultimate destiny of all things?” Having found some answers, he mistakes them for the ultimate answers; they are not.

There is no problem with a scientist saying that these sorts of questions lie beyond science, that science is only focused on material and efficient causality. Each discipline does have its area of focus. The error of scientism is in its claims that science alone explains all reality; it does not.

The usual response of those who ascribe to scientism (not all scientists do) to questions that science cannot answer is to dismiss them or to say that one day science will find an answer. When we, who are obviously creatures and contingent beings, dismiss our Creator, we are displaying either hardness of heart or a form of madness. Such a dismissal is neither rational nor reasonable.

This man-centered foolishness has had a long and oftentimes disastrous reign in the history of mankind. Sometimes it is theoretically expressed in the doctrine of materialism, which contends that reality may be explained in terms of matter in motion, that life is “a physiological process with a physiological meaning,” that man is a transient accident of protons and electrons traveling blind, that thought is a temporary product of gray matter, and that the events of history are an interaction of matter and motion operating by the principle of necessity.

Dr. King describes here the problem of reductionism, in which things are reduced to matter alone and attributed entirely to material causes. This view holds that even concepts such as justice, meaning, and beauty must somehow be explained materially in terms of their cause. The human soul that knows immaterial things does mediate its thoughts through the brain and the central nervous system, but it does not follow that the medium is the cause. It does not pertain to matter to be the cause of what is spiritual.

Having no place for God or for eternal ideas, materialism is opposed to both theism and idealism. This materialistic philosophy leads inevitably into a dead-end street in an intellectually senseless world. To believe that human personality is the result of the fortuitous interplay of atoms and electrons is as absurd as to believe that a monkey by hitting typewriter keys at random will eventually produce a Shakespearean play. Sheer magic!

Many atheists think they have solved this conundrum, but I think that they “solve” it with a set of assumptions so outlandish and unproven that it requires far more “faith” to accept them than to believe in an intelligent designer and creator.

The statistical possibility that things could come together “by chance” to form complex life—let alone intelligent life—and not just once but at least twice (for reproduction’s sake) is minuscule! (As Dr. King says, “Sheer magic!”) Those who demand we accept this explanation are far more credulous than are believers, who observe the intricate design of creation and conclude (reasonably) that there is an intelligent creator.

Read it all at: A Reflection on a Sermon of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Refuting Atheistic Materialism.

An interesting example of what we try to do here, and decidedly on point. Presented by a Lutheran, from a Catholic source, of a Baptist sermon, and all orthodox both to our churches and each others’.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Reflections on the Annunciation

26 Sunday Mar 2017

Posted by John Charmley in Anti Catholic, Bible, Catholic Tradition, Faith, Marian devotion

≈ 202 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Iconoclasmmisogyny, Marian veneration, orthodoxy, The Annunciation

Waterhouse_The_annunciation_BMJ

Our ancestors had a better sense of proportion on so many things than we do. Divorced, as so many of us are, from the natural rhythms of the seasons and their changing, they saw ‘Lady Day’ as an important staging post in the cycle of the year; coming soon after the spring equinox, and nine months before the traditional date for the birth of Christ, it was, for them, the start of the new year – symbolically marking the start of the new life for all Christians. Now, no doubt there are those odd souls who find in all of this pagan echoes, but if they could stop and use their brains instead of their emotions, they would see something rather wonderful – the Christianisation of paganism. The Church took time-honoured pagan customs and showed how they related to the Light of the World.

As expected, yesterday’s post on the Feast of the Annunciation prompted our resident iconoclast, Bosco, to utter his usual blasphemy to the effect that Our Lady had no choice but to become the Mother of the Saviour of the World. Let us examine St Luke’s account:

And coming to her, he said, “Hail, favored one! The Lord is with you.”m29But she was greatly troubled at what was said and pondered what sort of greeting this might be.30Then the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God.31n Behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall name him Jesus.32o He will be great and will be called Son of the Most High,* and the Lord God will give him the throne of David his father,33and he will rule over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.”p34But Mary said to the angel, “How can this be, since I have no relations with a man?”*35And the angel said to her in reply, “The holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. Therefore the child to be born will be called holy, the Son of God.q36And behold, Elizabeth, your relative, has also conceived* a son in her old age, and this is the sixth month for her who was called barren;37for nothing will be impossible for God.”r38Mary said, “Behold, I am the handmaid of the Lord. May it be done to me according to your word.” Then the angel departed from her.

Let us focus in on that last verse – ‘May it be done to me according to your word’. Now, perhaps Bosco’s English is not up to summarising it, so let us help him – here Our Lady is saying ‘yes’, she is giving her assent to the Good News brought to her by the Archangel. That is the plain reading, and it is noticeable that Bosco never, ever quotes it. It undermines his odd view that Our Lady never gave her consent. The pagan world was familiar with stories of mortal women being raped by the gods, but the Christian story does not begin thus, but with a young woman responding with fidelity and obedience to the news she is given; she could clearly have responded otherwise, but God had chosen her from her mother’s womb, and she received the greatest honour of any human – she became the mother of her, and our, Saviour. This is why Christians of all kinds revere her, indeed, even Luther and Calvin did so. Why then has there developed a virulent strain of misogyny within parts of Protestant Christianity?

In the main, I fear, it is to do with a peculiar form of blindness. There has always been a puritanical strain within Christianity which has had the most violent reaction to beauty; it cannot see a stained-glass window without wishing to break it; it cannot see a fresco, a wall-painting or a painting without wishing to whitewash it; it cannot see a statue without wishing to break it. It does all these things arrogantly. It claims that its adherents alone can interpret God’s commandments. The vast majority of Christians have followed the instincts of the Church from the earliest times – which is to bring the best things we can create and to consecrate them to God. Yes, we can worship him in a plain barn, but if we love him and we honour him, and he has given some of us great creative gifts, then it is right and proper to dedicate those gifts to his service. Apart from the iconoclasts, there’s not one person in a million who sees a statue in a Church and things anyone worships it; the question as to why the iconoclast does is one which lies with a psychiatrist rather than a theologian.

There is, in it, a form of misogyny, a virulent strain of something that sits within most Churches in one form or another. Christianity has grown to maturity in patriarchal societies in which women have seldom if ever been accorded the same rights as men. In Orthodoxy and Catholicism this has always been mitigated by Marian veneration. There are, to be sure, those feminist scholars who would see Mariology as a cover for misogyny, a way of excusing it by saying, in effect ‘but look, over here, we say a woman was the most important person ever, so how can we be misogynists?’ Well, to be sure, there’s something in that, but that would also be an example of how you can’t please all of the people all of the time; would they really rather that was not there, that exception, from which so many more exceptions have grown?

So, let us conclude this reflection with some verses of St Cyril of Alexandria:

 

Through you, the Trinity is glorified. / Through you, the Cross is venerated throughout the world./ Through you, angels and archangels rejoice. / Through you, the demons are driven away.
Through you, the fallen creature is raised to heaven. / Through you, the churches are founded in the whole world. /Through you, people are led to conversion.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

The feast day of St John the Divine

27 Tuesday Dec 2016

Posted by John Charmley in Bible, Catholic Tradition, Faith, St John

≈ 37 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Christianity, Faith, St John

Saint_John_Apostle

Today, by long tradition, the Church celebrates the feast of St John, the disciple whom Jesus ‘loved best’. He it was who, again according to tradition, rested upon the Saviour’s breast at the Last Supper, and it was to him that Jesus entrusted His mother in his final agonies on the Cross. The same tradition which tells us these things, tells us he is the author of the Gospel and the three epistles which bear his name; it also tells us he is the author of the vision captured in the ‘Apocalypse’ or ‘Revelation of St John the Divine’. That same tradition tells us that he lived to a great old age.

As the last surviving Apostle, St John provided a direct link back to the earthly ministry of Jesus. Tradition has it that he was much revered by the local community, and that in old age he would be asked often to sum up the message of the Lord Jesus. His answer sometimes disappointed those who expected some profound statement of doctrinal truth. He would say: “My little children, love one another.” After hearing this advice over and over again, several members of the congregation asked St. John: “Master, why do you always say this?” He replied with a gentle smile: “It is the Lord’s command. And if this alone be done, it is enough!”

The image of the last of the Apostles haunted the imagination of the Victorian poet, Robert Browning, who wrote a now all but forgotten poem about his death, called ‘A Death in the Desert’:

If I live yet, it is for good, more love

Through me to men: be nought but ashes here

That keep awhile my semblance, who was John,—

Still, when they scatter, there is left on earth

No one alive who knew (consider this!)

—Saw with his eyes and handled with his hands

That which was from the first, the Word of Life.

How will it be when none more saith ‘I saw’?”

At that point in history, the Apostolic tradition became wholly from memory. But St John had already committed to paper his own account of Jesus, as well as letters to his church and, again if we can credit tradition, written the Revelation whilst in exile on Patmos.

Despite the modern fashion for doubting whether St. John wrote the letters, Gospel and Apocalypse which bear his name, the early church was in no doubt: these books were included in the canon because they were his work; it may be that, as in so much else, we imagine ourselves as so much wiser than the ancients; but it may be, as so often, that we are not so. After all, Polycarp, who was ordained by St John, taught St Irenaeus, and neither of them seemed in any doubt.

The wonderful prologue to the Gospel gives us a true poetic insight into the Divine origin of Jesus, and poses for us the question with which all Christology grapples – how God can have been human and divine – as well as answering it. His understanding that Christ was fully human and fully divine clearly failed to appeal to those who wished to reduce Him to something their imaginations could grasp. St. John was far from meek and mild towards those who denied the truth. This we see in his epistles, but also in the tradition which St. Irenaeus had from Polycarp of his encounter with a notorious heretic Cerinthus in a bath-house. Hearing that the latter was within, John started back, and said “Let us, my brethren, make haste and be gone, lest the bath, wherein is Cerinthus the enemy of the Truth, should fall upon our heads.”

We see the same concern for truth in his epistles, which suggest that not even the witness of the last of the Apostles was enough for some men who claimed to be led by the Spirit. John bore witness to the Truth – a person, not a concept. Like so many of the followers of Jesus, John had seen through a glass darkly, but thereafter he saw in the bright light of the Resurrection. We cannot know precisely why he wrote his Gospel, but we can see clearly enough what drives it – indeed he states as much himself (John 20:31):

these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name.

It is not like the other Gospels. It tells us but little about the life of Jesus, perhaps assuming that those interested in such things already had access to the accounts of Matthew, Mark and Luke. But what it does tell us unambiguously is what heretics doubted from reading the other texts – which is that Jesus was Divine. He was the Word who, from the beginning, spoke creation into existence. It is not accidental that he concentrates heavily on Christ’s controversies with His opponents; John faced the same doubters throughout his ministry. He stresses his credentials as an eye-witness, and those who take it upon themselves to doubt his testimony, strike at the heart of what he is about – which is the distinction between truth and falsehood. John is, above all, a witness to the Truth and calls us to believe that Jesus is indeed the Christ.

 

St John the Evangelist, pray for us!

 

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

O Root of Jesse

19 Monday Dec 2016

Posted by John Charmley in Advent, Bible, Catholic Tradition, Early Church, Faith, Marian devotion

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Jesse, Jesus, O Antiphons

cc180-600x600

O Root of Jesse, standing as a sign among the peoples;

before you kings will shut their mouths,

to you the nations will make their prayer:

Come and deliver us, and delay no longer

The Jesse tree is a familiar sight to any medievalist. Liking to celebrate their own lineage, the idea of taking Isaiah’s verses about the Messiah being born of the root of the tree of Jesse appealed to the kings of this world, and so it was an image much copied. It reminds us of something central to the Christian faith – which is that the Word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us; he who had no beginning and was ungenerated, became a creature with a birth – a real baby, a real boy and a real man crucified in the Cross for our sins. It was not, perhaps surprising that one of the earliest heresies was a protest against such an idea. Adoptionism argued that Christ was a man who was adopted by God at the moment of the baptism in the Jordan, and that the Spirit of God left him on the Cross – a line of heresy which found its way into the Islamic take on Christ. We are so familiar with the idea of the Incarnation that we are apt to forget what a radical idea it is.

The ancient Greeks and Romans were very familiar with the idea of gods taking on human form and interfering in human affairs, and the Jews, who rejected polytheism, were familiar with the idea, discussed in yesterday’s post, of God speaking to man out of the flames. But the notion that the one God should have actually become a human being, should have had a human mother, and should have suffered and died, was an extremely radical one. For one thing, if there was only one God, who, then, was God whilst God was being a human baby? The very idea seemed to the Jews a direct challenge to their monotheism, as it does, to this day, to Muslim theologians. The dogma of the Trinity derives from the way in which Scripture talks about God as both Father, Word and Spirit. It was the Word who became flesh, not the Father or the Spirit, and yet all were God; the Trinity is the only answer to the dilemma this poses to monotheists.

Isaiah had said that the promised Messiah would be if the root of Jesse, and both Luke and Matthew reach back to this prophesy, although, of course, the lineage is via Mary rather than by his foster father; but the ancients were familiar with the idea that the foster son could be the legitimate heir of the emperor – it was a common enough phenomenon in the Roman Empire. The Evangelists were anxious to show how the Scriptures with which they were familiar – what we call the Old Testament –  spoke of Jesus. The Septuagint, which they used, spoke of the Messiah being born of a Virgin. Luke has the confirmation of this prophecy in his Gospel, and from the best source available – the mother of Jesus herself. Who else could have told him of the words she had spoken in praise of God after the Annunciation? Writing, as they were, for fellow Jews, both Evangelists stressed the evidence to be found in Scripture.

Jesus himself used the image of himself as the vine, with us as the branches. He knew, as men who live in a predominantly agricultural economy do, that the soil in which the plant was rooted was of vital importance to its flourishing. So it is with us as Christians. If we are rooted in him, then we shall bear fruit, and if not, then not. Lord, let us be rooted in the reality of our life with you that, through the fruit we bear, we may bear witness to you.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

O Sapientia

17 Saturday Dec 2016

Posted by John Charmley in Faith

≈ 3 Comments

Tags

Catholic, wisdom


O Wisdom coming forth from the mouth of the Most High, reaching from one end to the other, mightily and sweetly ordering all things. Come and teach us the way of Prudence (Wisdom). 

 This is the first of the ‘O Antiphons’ which, in the early centuries of the Faith, the Church prayed on either side of the Magnificat at Vespers from 17 to 23 December. Each begins with invoking Christ, although he is never mentioned by name, but rather by his attributes, titles taken from the Old Testament: we begin with ‘Wisdom’ and move through others, including ‘root’ (of Jesse), ‘key’ and ‘Lord’. Ecclesiasticus 24:1-9 tells us that wisdom comes from the ‘mouth of the Most High’. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God’. God spoke the world into existence – he said ‘let there be light, and there was light’. We pray for light, especially in this the dark part of the year. We sit in the great darkness of this FallenWorld, and we hear words twisted by knaves to make fools of us all, and sometimes we long for light and silence.

It was into this great darkness that the Light came, and it was beneath the babble of this world that we hear the still, small voice calling us home; a voice of wisdom, of calmness and of mercy. We cannot illumine this blackness, nor have we the wisdom to find our way in it; there is no truth the fool says. Truth is a Person, the Word, the Wisdom of the Most High, and he teaches those who will hear. His is not a promise of worldly success or wealth, and he knew full well that those with those things were in danger of forgetting him and his precepts; in their pride they looked to themselves and their merits; but that is a delusion- the Word has spoken, and he tells us the wisdom known to a small child – trust your Father in Heaven. Though he appear at times as a burning fire, that is the refiner’s fire which burns away our impurities, and which gives light to the way we must travel.

Grant us wisdom, O Lord, that we might love you more deeply and follow you more faithfully.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Rigidity?

14 Wednesday Dec 2016

Posted by John Charmley in Faith, Pope

≈ 62 Comments

Tags

Catholic

I have steered clear of the ongoing arguments over the Pope and his drizzle of comments about people being ‘rigid’; he’s entitled to his views, and I’m entitled to think they are unfortunate and best left not said. It was, you will remember, the rigid Pharisees who were in favour of the Mosaic law allowing divorce, and it was Jesus who rigidly insisted that divorce was not to be allowed; one wonders which ‘rigidity’ the Pope would condemn? 

I daresay those English Catholics who refused to conform to what Henry VIII and Elizabeth demanded of Catholics were on the rigid side, and all that dying for the faith once received was undoubtedly a sign of an unwillingness to make the sort of compromises that the non-rigid find comes naturally. I’m even of the view that there is a patron saint of the rigid – that would be St Athanasius, who kept insisting that the Nicene Creed was not for changing.

We need to be more careful than painting with such broad brush-strokes suggests. The idea that all those who insist on rigidity are justified by the example of St Athanasius is a dangerous one, and one can only wonder how many small-minded men insisting that man was made for the sabbath have called that courageous saint in aid? Mercy and love are the marks of God, and to condemn might be a sign of narrow-mindedness; context matters. This is not to argue for situational ethics, but it is to assert the right of the Church to decide whether an individual sinner is in the wrong. Indeed, I suspect many readers would be much happier if the Pope would make a decision on the issues raised by the dubia. He says he likes an argument, and I am sure we’d all love him to continue it.

There is a type of Catholicism which seems unable to distinguish between the ball and the man – to criticise an individual by insulting him is often done, but frequency does not make something right. Telling loyal subordinates that they are not working for the institution when they know they are is to creates poor atmosphere- so let’s hope the Pope remembers someone asking ‘who am I to judge?’

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Homily, 23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time (Cycle B) Fr Peter Kirwin

07 Monday Sep 2015

Posted by John Charmley in Faith, Homilies

≈ 12 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Catholic Church, Christianity

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Change or development?

03 Tuesday Feb 2015

Posted by John Charmley in Bible, Faith, Reading the BIble

≈ 106 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Catholic Church, Christianity

CouncilOfConstantinople381BnFMSGr510

Some writers would have us believe that in response to the events of the period between 70 and 135 AD, the early Church fundamentally changed its view of Jesus, and that a Jewish prophet was transformed into a Christian God by the infusion of Platonic concepts via St John and his idea of Jesus as ‘the Word made flesh’. This, of course, an odd thing, since St John himself is part of the Tradition of the Church, and wrote in Apostolic times, so it is hard to argue that his views were somehow not those of the early Church. If his views gained great traction, it was because they spoke to the experience of Christians who also encountered Christ.

What John offered, and offers, is, like Paul, a way of understanding some of the things in Synoptics which, if read literally and in a purely Jewish context, pointed to a Jewish Messiah who was going to liberate Israel. Clearly, by the time of John’s death. Jesus was not coming again in the lifetime of any of the Apostles; that may, for all we know, have led some of what St Peter calls ‘scoffers’, to reject the Christian message; but for most Christians, it meant trying to understand what such texts really meant. Now, if one means, by ‘tradition’, accepting what one generation held and never changing it, one is, alas, out of luck at the very start, because the second generation of Christians, like nearly all subsequent ones, did not accept that the end of the world was nigh.

That second generation also had to drop the idea that the ‘kingdom’ meant the return of the twelve tribes to Jerusalem under the rule of the twelve Apostles; it had not happened, and it still has not happened. Oddly, or not, not even the most literalist reader now accepts what the first generation who heard Mark, Matthew and Luke accepted about this matter. Having written that, someone may well point out some American sect which does indeed believe this; if there is one, leave me in ignorance of it.

If Jesus was not, then, a political Messiah who would come soon to free Israel and restore the Torah, what was He? Here, both St John and St Paul provided what would have been missing from Scripture if we had only the Synoptic Gospels.

If we had been provided solely with the synoptics and a literal reading, we should have been in trouble. Mark can be read as implying that Jesus was very liberal in his attitude toward the Torah, whilst Matthew seems to state precisely the opposite, stating that Torah must be kept to the smallest detail. Certainly all those who had known Jesus in the flesh seem to have been of the opinion that what Matthew relates was the case. The ‘men from James’ who preached against Paul’s views on Torah and food were called ‘false brethren’ by Paul, and yet came from the mother church of Christendom preaching what those who, unlike Paul, had walked with Jesus thought he had taught. So, they were, without doubt, upholding the tradition they had received, and no doubt expected Paul to accept that. As we know he did anything but, upbraiding Peter himself for backsliding and defending his views at the Council in Jerusalem, where they were accepted. As far as we know, the Jerusalem Church continued to insist on Torah, but as it was destroyed in 132 AD, that turned out not to matter.

Nonetheless, we see, again, how the Church struggled with what it had received and, far from insisting unbendingly on a literalist understanding, was open to the movement of the Spirit. The discussions were certainly heated ones, but we are in the presence of men open to the promptings of the Spirit and who, when it points where they did not think to go, went there all the same. Those who had known Jesus seem to have thought keeping the Torah was what he wanted, those who had not, or who accepted the Pauline view, thought that this could be relaxed for Gentiles, a view Peter came to, and which his disciple, Mark, recorded in his Gospel. So, we see, in Mark’s Gospel, a softening of what was in Matthew, not because Mark was falsifying the record, but because he was accurately reflecting the developing understanding of the Church; that is true Tradition.

Well within the life time of the Apostles, the Church not only found itself having to reconsider what it thought Jesus had meant, it did so successfully not by relying on any external forces, but by following the promptings of the Spirit within it. Here, St John was perhaps the most significant force for good, although, as we shall see, his contribution led to much dissent.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...

Becket

29 Monday Dec 2014

Posted by John Charmley in Church/State, Faith, Persecution

≈ 13 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Catholicism, history

/home/wpcom/public_html/wp-content/blogs.dir/e40/36089350/files/2014/12/img_0737.jpg

Before the reign of Henry VIII, Becket was the centre of the largest shrine in England, and one of the largest in the world. Henry VIII revenged himself for his Angevin ancestor; where Henry II had submitted himself for penance, Henry VIII had the shrine destroyed and plundered its wealth; never again would some jumped-up cleric challenge a King of England – and live. This lesson St John Fisher and St Thomas More were to learn. After centuries of failing to bring the Church under their control, the Kings of England hit on the answer – get rid of the Pope and make yourself its head. In such an England, Becket, whose feast day we celebrate today, was an embarrassment.

It is certain that Henry, otherwise theologically conservative, wanted very little change, but he found he had opened a Pandora’s box. Under his more radical son, Edward VI, England became a Protestant nation, and if his early death halted the radicalism, then the early death of his sister, Mary, halted the counter-reformation, leaving their surviving siater, Elizabeth, to construct her own version of a compromise, which has lasted to this day. But as she and her successors found, once you give an example of disobedience, others will follow it, and within half a century there were numerous sects, all claiming to be able to understand the Bible better than each other.

Becket, like most historical figures, has been picked up by those who want him to prove their point: Whigs saw him as an anti-Monarchy figure; Protestant historians as a champion of ecclesiastical privilege; and film-makers as a good subject for drama. Through such rich encrustations it becomes hard to discern the martyr – the man who scorned to take the route later taken by Wolsey, of serving the King first and God second. As we stand in great need of such men in our time, let us pray to the Saint that God will raise up among us, more such.

Share this:

  • Tweet

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

AATW writers

  • audremyers
    • Internet
    • Context
  • cath.anon
    • What Brought You to Faith?
    • 2021: Year of Hope
  • John Charmley
    • The Epiphany
    • The Magi
  • No Man's Land
    • Crowns of Glory and Honor
    • Monkeys and Mud: Evolution, Origins, and Ancestors (Part II)
  • Geoffrey RS Sales
    • Material world
    • Christianity and religion
  • JessicaHoff
    • How unbelievable?
    • How not to disagree
  • Neo
    • Christmas Eve Almost Friends
    • None Dare Call it Apostasy
  • Nicholas
    • 25th January: The Conversion of Saint Paul
    • Friday Thoughts
  • orthodoxgirl99
    • Veiling, a disappearing reverence
  • Patrick E. Devens
    • Vatican II…Reforming Council or Large Mistake?
    • The Origins of the Authority of the Pope (Part 2)
  • RichardM
    • Battle Lines? Yes, but remember that the battle is already won
  • Rob
    • The Road to Emmaus
    • The Idolatry of Religion
  • Snoop's Scoop
    • In the fight that matters; all are called to be part of the Greatest Generation
    • Should we fear being complicit to sin
  • Struans
    • Being Catholic
    • Merry Christmas Everyone
  • theclassicalmusicianguy
    • The war on charismatics
    • The problem with Protestantism

Categories

Recent Posts

  • 25th January: The Conversion of Saint Paul Tuesday, 25 January 2022
  • The Epiphany Thursday, 6 January 2022
  • The Magi Wednesday, 5 January 2022
  • Christmas Eve Almost Friends Friday, 24 December 2021
  • The undiscovered ends? Sunday, 1 August 2021
  • Atque et vale Friday, 30 July 2021
  • None Dare Call it Apostasy Monday, 3 May 2021
  • The ‘Good thief’ and us Saturday, 3 April 2021
  • Good? Friday Friday, 2 April 2021
  • And so, to the Garden Thursday, 1 April 2021

Top Posts & Pages

  • Raising Lazarus: the view from the Church Fathers
  • Atheism: thoughts of Fulton J. Sheen
  • The Fathers on the Papacy: Irenaeus, St Jerome
  • About
  • The Paschal homily of St John Chrysostom
  • The Desperation of Atheist Trolls
  • There But for The Grace of God Go I
  • How many women were at the foot of the Cross?
  • Devotion: women and veiling

Archives

Blogs I Follow

  • The Bell Society
  • ViaMedia.News
  • Sundry Times Too
  • grahart
  • John Ager's Home on the Web!
  • ... because God is love
  • sharedconversations
  • walkonthebeachblog
  • The Urban Monastery
  • His Light Material
  • The Authenticity of Grief
  • All Along the Watchtower
  • Classically Christian
  • Norfolk Tales, Myths & More!
  • On The Ruin Of Britain
  • The Beeton Ideal
  • KungFuPreacherMan
  • Revd Alice Watson
  • All Things Lawful And Honest
  • The Tory Socialist
  • Liturgical Poetry
  • Contemplation in the shadow of a carpark
  • Gavin Ashenden
  • Ahavaha
  • On This Rock Apologetics
  • sheisredeemedblog
  • Quodcumque - Serious Christianity
  • ignatius his conclave
  • Nick Cohen: Writing from London
  • Ratiocinativa
  • Grace sent Justice bound
  • Eccles is saved
  • Elizaphanian
  • News for Catholics
  • Annie
  • Dominus Mihi Adjutor
  • christeeleisonblog.wordpress.com/
  • Malcolm Guite
  • Bishop's Encyclopedia of Religion, Society and Philosophy
  • LIVING GOD
  • tiberjudy
  • maggi dawn
  • thoughtfullydetached
  • A Tribe Called Anglican
  • Living Eucharist
  • The Liturgical Theologian
  • Tales from the Valley
  • iconismus
  • Men Are Like Wine
  • Acts of the Apostasy

Blog Stats

  • 454,418 hits

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 8,576 other subscribers

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

The Bell Society

Justice for Bishop George Bell of Chichester - Seeking Truth, Unity and Peace

ViaMedia.News

Rediscovering the Middle Ground

Sundry Times Too

a scrap book of words and pictures

grahart

reflections, links and stories.

John Ager's Home on the Web!

reflecting my eclectic (and sometimes erratic) life

... because God is love

wondering, learning, exploring

sharedconversations

Reflecting on sexuality and gender identity in the Church of England

walkonthebeachblog

The Urban Monastery

Work and Prayer

His Light Material

Reflections, comment, explorations on faith, life, church, minstry & meaning.

The Authenticity of Grief

Mental health & loss in the Church

All Along the Watchtower

A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you ... John 13:34

Classically Christian

ancient, medieval, byzantine, anglican

Norfolk Tales, Myths & More!

Stories From Norfolk and Beyond - Be They Past, Present, Fact, Fiction, Mythological, Legend or Folklore.

On The Ruin Of Britain

Miscellanies on Religion and Public life

The Beeton Ideal

Gender, Family and Religious History in the Modern Era

KungFuPreacherMan

Faith, life and kick-ass moves

Revd Alice Watson

More beautiful than the honey locust tree are the words of the Lord - Mary Oliver

All Things Lawful And Honest

A blog pertaining to the future of the Church

The Tory Socialist

Blue Labour meets Disraelite Tory meets High Church Socialist

Liturgical Poetry

Poems from life and the church year

Contemplation in the shadow of a carpark

Contmplations for beginners

Gavin Ashenden

Ahavaha

On This Rock Apologetics

The Catholic Faith Defended

sheisredeemedblog

To bring identity and power back to the voice of women

Quodcumque - Serious Christianity

“Whatever you do, do it with your whole heart.” ( Colossians 3: 23 ) - The blog of Father Richard Peers SMMS, Director of Education for the Diocese of Liverpool

ignatius his conclave

Nick Cohen: Writing from London

Journalism from London.

Ratiocinativa

Mining the collective unconscious

Grace sent Justice bound

“Love recognizes no barriers. It jumps hurdles, leaps fences, penetrates walls to arrive at its destination full of hope.” — Maya Angelou

Eccles is saved

A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you ... John 13:34

Elizaphanian

“I come not from Heaven, but from Essex.”

News for Catholics

Annie

Blessed be God forever.

Dominus Mihi Adjutor

A Monk on the Mission

christeeleisonblog.wordpress.com/

“The harvest is abundant but the laborers are few" Luke 10:2

Malcolm Guite

Blog for poet and singer-songwriter Malcolm Guite

Bishop's Encyclopedia of Religion, Society and Philosophy

The Site of James Bishop (CBC, TESOL, Psych., BTh, Hon., MA., PhD candidate)

LIVING GOD

Reflections from the Dean of Southwark

tiberjudy

Happy. Southern. Catholic.

maggi dawn

thoughtfullydetached

A Tribe Called Anglican

"...a fellowship, within the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church..."

Living Eucharist

A daily blog to deepen our participation in Mass

The Liturgical Theologian

legem credendi lex statuat supplicandi

Tales from the Valley

"Not all those who wander are lost"- J.R.R. Tolkien

iconismus

Pictures by Catherine Young

Men Are Like Wine

Acts of the Apostasy

  • Follow Following
    • All Along the Watchtower
    • Join 2,221 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • All Along the Watchtower
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.

    %d bloggers like this: