• Home
  • About
  • Awards
  • Dialogue with a Muslim: links
    • 1st response
    • Second response
    • Final response
  • Saturday Jess

All Along the Watchtower

~ A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you … John 13:34

All Along the Watchtower

Category Archives: Faith

A coming storm

25 Wednesday Apr 2018

Posted by Nicholas in Faith

≈ 44 Comments

It is ten years since the financial crisis of 2008 and, like many others in the conservative blogosphere, I find myself wondering if we have learnt any lessons from it. Given that the nations of the world have not re-instated the gold standard, ended the rule of the central banks, collapsed the Euro, or established 100%-reserve banking for deposit accounts, I am very much afraid that it is only a matter of time before another crisis hits. There are several concerning factors that lead me to this conclusion.

Firstly, there is the simple fact that some prominent figures, with individual reasoning of their own, believe that another crisis is coming.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5614949/Bill-Gates-warns-financial-crisis-coming-like-2008-Great-Recession.html

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/qa-is-another-financial-crisis-on-the-way/

http://uk.businessinsider.com/bank-of-england-governor-mervyn-king-another-crisis-is-certain-2016-2

Such figures do not usually make these statements lightly: their arguments and evidence ought to be considered.

Secondly, there is the argument from sustainable growth. If sustainable growth is possible only on the basis of savings, and not on the basis of unsupported credit, then an expansion of unsupported credit should be a cause of concern. As described in the post on the two primary types of banking, it is possible, though not ethical, to use deposit funds to support credit arrangements. When banks do this, they effectively create credit out of nothing, because the deposit funds cannot simultaneously be available for withdrawal by the depositor and be under the use of a third party borrower. When all of the depositors come at once to withdraw their funds, only to find that these funds have already been given to borrowers who have not yet repaid them, the bank collapses. When this happens across multiple banks at the same time, the banking sector as a whole is badly affected. When a country is heavily reliant on the banking sector to provide jobs and credit and handle transactions, the collapse of several banks becomes problematic for the country as a whole.

 

Thirdly, there is the problem of peak oil, which could be exacerbated by wars in the Middle East (e.g. an Iranian invasion of Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia). If we have passed the point of peak oil, allowing that demand stays the same (it, could of course, go up), the price of oil will increase dramatically. This will be worsened by increased costs involved in extracting harder to reach deposits. Oil is a crucial commodity for the world economy: although alternatives are being developed and slowly relied upon, we have not yet reached the point where we can cast oil aside. The period in which we find ourselves at the moment makes us vulnerable: a prolonged crisis similar to that of the 1970s would require individuals, businesses, and governments to change their behaviour.

http://uk.businessinsider.com/the-future-of-oil-supply-and-demand-2016-9

View story at Medium.com

Finally, there is the overall trend in gold prices. Following the 2008 crisis, the price of gold went up markedly. People buy gold in crises because it holds its value well. They do this with several thoughts in mind. There is the hope that they will be able to use some of the stockpile to buy commodities and other resources in the event of a currency collapse. The rest is retained in order to open new bank accounts in the event of a bank collapse and/or to obtain new currency at a time when a stable national currency is reintroduced. Fearing a number of possible scenarios, a number of people invested in gold following the crisis, and it reached its peak in 2011. Since then, in the thought that we are gradually recovering, the price has come down – but it has not returned to 2008 levels. It may yet go down if we are genuinely on the road to recovery, but the fact that it has not suggests there are still lingering fears in the market. These are fuelled by the factors above and, in Europe, concerns that the root causes of the Euro crisis have not really been fixed. If there is a sustained upward trend in gold prices, that could be a bad sign.

https://www.gold.co.uk/gold-price/10year/ounces/USD/

This post is not meant to depress, and I stress that I am not a detailed prognosticator. I do not KNOW that a crash is coming, much less when and on what particular trigger, but I do honestly believe that one is not far off. Nevertheless, these factors should make us all think long and hard about the precarious state of Western economies and what we really value: the value that many of us place on liberty will make us willing to experience short-term hardship for the sake of preserving it. In my own case, I did not vote for Brexit in the belief that we would immediately become prosperous as a result of it – far from it. But I hoped that we might gain the liberty we needed to put ourselves back on a firm footing. Only time will tell if this or successive governments in the UK learn the lessons of the past.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Seeds of destruction

24 Tuesday Apr 2018

Posted by Nicholas in Faith

≈ 29 Comments

DISCLAIMER: the following is a discussion of principles of banking and Roman jurisprudence. The author is not a qualified lawyer. This post is not intended or offered as a guide to banking or investment at the time of writing or in the future. For current legal advice on the status of different kinds of banking, please consult a qualified lawyer.

***

I am currently reading a sample of Money, Bank Credit, and Economic Cycles, by Jesus Huerta de Soto, a professor of Applied Economics at King Juan Carlos University, and a Senior Fellow of the Mises Institute. The book is fascinating, exploring the legal, moral, and economic understanding of different kinds of banking through the ages, beginning with an examination of Roman jurisprudence (which forms the basis of the civil law systems of Western Europe and South America). This book is a critique of fractional reserve banking from an Austrian economic point of view.

He begins by making a distinction between deposit banking and loan banking. In deposit banking, which can be split into two subcategories, regular and irregular, the depositary agrees to protect the deposit of the depositor, guaranteeing its availability to the depositor at any time upon request. In the regular version, a specific item is left (e.g. a painting), which can be reclaimed later. In the irregular version, fungible goods (e.g. money) are left, and the depositary guarantees to return, upon request, goods in the same amount of the same quality and value (but not the specific coins originally handed over), referred to in Latin as the tantundem qualitatis et bonitatis. The depositary, in running a business, will sometimes charge for this security and availability service. He must always keep the same amount of the given good as originally deposited, otherwise he will have be found to have misappropriated it. In some law systems, not only would such action give rise to criminal liability, but it would also create a right to interest on the part of the depositor, to compensate him for the time in which he did not have access to the full amount of his deposit.

Loan banking, on the other hand, works quite differently. In this instance, the lender agrees to forego access to an amount of money, for example, for a set term, on the understanding that he will receive the same amount back with additional interest at the end of the term. If the banker fails to meet these terms, he will be in breach of contract (and may be liable for misrepresentation, if he never had the intention of honouring his agreement). The speculative nature of this kind of banking entails a greater kind of risk, since the banker will use the money to generate the both or either capital or income in order to yield interest to the lender. Accordingly, in Roman jurisprudence, in the event of insolvency, depositors ranked higher in priority than creditors, since creditors were deemed to have accepted the risk that their investments might prove fruitless.

There are a number of dangers inherent in the existence of these two systems side-by-side.  Firstly, there is the danger that a bank patron will choose the wrong service for his needs, either through ignorance on his part or as the result of miscommunication or deception. A person who thought he was a depositor, when in law he was a creditor, would be very angry in the event of his bank’s insolvency. Secondly, there is the danger that an unscrupulous banker will appropriate money from the deposit for use as a loan in the belief that he will have generated a return to pay back the loss before the depositor asks for his money back.

The latter danger is the essence of fractional reserve banking. A bank that operates in this manner gambles on the probability that at any one time, there will not be a demand for withdrawals that is greater than the sums held on reserve. Such a practice would be considered unethical in Roman jurisprudence, but is mainstream in Western banking today. The problem occurs when just such an unlikely scenario occurs, triggered by fears of bad investments in the commercial world or concerns about mismanagement by company officers or general adverse economic conditions.

In such an event, where a bank cannot meet the demands of its clients, it must be declared insolvent, unless it can be rescued. If the bank is allowed to go insolvent, this will be a great pain to the natural and non-natural persons who have left money with it. There will be some ripples from this as the missing funds will mean that some contracts and plans dependent on them cannot proceed. However, the overall effect will be contained.

How might the bank be “rescued”? Private individuals could try to make up the losses – but few would be willing to do this, and those who did will not be remunerated if their contributions are gifts. If they are loans, there is the possibility that the bank will not be able to repay them. If it does, this may come at someone else’s expense.

If the government decides to shore up the bank, it will have to find money of its own to do this: it can print more money at the central bank; it can take out a loan; it can raise taxes. If the government prints more money, it is likely that this will cause inflation because, chances are, demand for money will not increase proportionately. Inflation decreases the spending power of the national currency, so this measure effectively works out as a tax on citizens. If it also undermines international confidence in the country, this can have an impact on foreign investment.

If the government raises taxes, this imposes an additional burden on taxpayers but also creates further problems. It encourages other banks to behave as recklessly as the example above in the belief that the government will rescue them too. Furthermore, it creates ill feeling among the citizenry, because many will ask why they should have to pay for the misfeasance of others. Thirdly, if corporation tax is increased, this will encourage many businesses to move to countries with a lower rate.

Lastly, there is the loan option. This has the same problems as the tax example above, only the effects are deferred. The loan will eventually have to be repaid, especially if it is owed to a foreign creditor. The more loans the state has to take out, the greater the chance of a fall in confidence, which could encourage people to sell their stockpiles of that nation’s currency, decreasing its purchasing power on the foreign markets.

Given all of the above, one can understand why many would prefer for there to be a clear demarcation between deposit accounts and loan accounts in banks. A bank should maintain a 100% reserve at all times for its deposit accounts and charge a fee for its services (safeguarding, counting, paying bills), since it is doing this as a business. The more people who use the bank, the lower the fee will be, because the bank can make economies of scale. When someone opens an account, they should always have an adviser who explains in simple terms exactly what their options are and what the consequences of these options will be in the event of insolvency. Loan accounts could still be permitted under this scheme, because they are effectively investments. Provided that the risks are explained to the customer before he contracts with the bank, there will be no misrepresentation and he will be deemed to have accepted the risk. It will be fair to let him lose out by not having the government refund him if the investment proves bad. What should not happen, as has in the past, is the mixing of funds from loan and deposit accounts.

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Son of God (5)

23 Monday Apr 2018

Posted by Nicholas in Faith

≈ 1 Comment

This concludes our series on the title, Son of God. Understandably, it has not provoked the kind of discussion that political, economic, social, and ethical posts tend to on this site. However, I hope it has been of some benefit to our readers, and encouraged people to think a little more deeply about the nuances of this term as applied to Jesus in the New Testament and as used in Intertestamental literature.

The King of Israel

And when thy days be fulfilled, and thou shalt sleep with thy fathers, I will set up thy seed after thee, which shall proceed out of thy bowels, and I will establish his kingdom. He shall build an house for my name, and I will stablish the throne of his kingdom for ever. I will be his father, and he shall be my son. If he commit iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men, and with the stripes of the children of men: But my mercy shall not depart away from him, as I took it from Saul, whom I put away before thee. And thine house and thy kingdom shall be established for ever before thee: thy throne shall be established for ever.

-2 Samuel 7:12-16

He shall be great, and shall be called the Son of the Highest: and the Lord God shall give unto him the throne of his father David: And he shall reign over the house of Jacob for ever; and of his kingdom there shall be no end.

-Luke 1:32-33

In many ancient cultures, the king was held to be the son of the patron god of the state. In Egypt, the Pharaoh was the embodiment of the god Horus, who was the son of Osiris and Isis. Some Phoenician and Canaanite states appear to have viewed their ruler as a son of Baal. In many cases, descent was ancestral. Thus many of the Greek and Roman rulers and noble families claimed descent from a god and a hero who was a son of a god. For example, it was common to claim some form of descent from Heracles, the son of Zeus.

These claims allowed kings to inspire awe in their subjects, and to argue that they ruled in the name of their god, attributing holiness, righteousness, and wisdom to their reigns. In Israel, Nathan’s prophecy to David, cited above, and the offices of prophet and priest, put a brake on heedless extravagance and arrogance. The kings of Judah were not literal descendants of YHWH, and their actions could be rebuked by reference to oracles from YHWH or unfavourable comparison with the Torah.

Following the Babylonian Exile, the descendants of David lost much of their political power. Zerubbabel was a governor of Yehud, but it is not clear that all subsequent governors were descendants of David. The Hasmonaeans, who later claimed the title of king, were Levites and Aaronides, and the Herodian dynasty was of Idumaean (Edomite) descent. Thus hopes of a new David clustered around the concept of the Messiah, a special figure who, like David, would be a man after YHWH’s own heart – holy, righteous, wise, strong, and compassionate.

When Jesus the Son of God and Son of David came, He showed the people what a true Davidic ruler could be like and as the incarnation of the Second YHWH, was true link between the people and their God, combining the offices of prophet, priest, and king. He was a second David, and a second Solomon: David conquered the powers, and Solomon ruled in the golden age. The Millennium, conceived as a kind of Sabbath-like and Edenic rule, is an echo of the description of the time of Solomon. But peace and order must be fought for:  as the ancient kings in their religious festivals re-enacted the stories of their gods fighting the powers of death and chaos (chaoskampf), so Jesus actually fought the powers of darkness and defeated death – the ultimate warrior and shepherd king.

“Are you the King of the Jews?”

“That is how you would say it, yes.”

-Matthew 27:11

 

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

The Son of God (4)

21 Saturday Apr 2018

Posted by Nicholas in Faith

≈ Leave a comment

Israel

Israel is sometimes called God’s son in the Bible (and God’s servant). Applying the Deuteronomy 32 worldview, in which the nations were divided up among the sons of God, the relationship can be understood as fatherly supervision: the sons of God were supposed to be fathers to their nations, and YHWH was Father to Israel. The concept goes beyond that. YHWH did not simply appropriate a nation “off-the-shelf”: He miraculously caused Sarah, who was barren, to conceive Isaac, the father of Jacob, and He chose Jacob over Esau, renaming Jacob following his night of wrestling with the Angel of the YHWH. God caused Israel to be and called Israel out of Egypt, which Matthew applied to Jesus.

When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt. As they called them, so they went from them: they sacrificed unto Baalim, and burned incense to graven images.

-Hosea 11:1-2

When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt: and was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.

-Matthew 2:14-15

Israel was called to a mission. It was not the will of God that the nations should be subject to the sons of God forever or that they should not know Him. They were punished for their rebellion at Babel, but God’s will was always to save as many as possible. Even in the Old Testament period, we have examples of Gentiles coming to faith in the God of Israel: Hagar; the Egyptians and foreigners who joined the Israelite Exodus; Rahab; Ruth; Uriah the Hittite; Naaman. Israel was to be an example to the nations:

Keep therefore and do them; for this is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the nations, which shall hear all these statutes, and say, Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.

-Deuteronomy 4:6

And to make thee high above all nations which he hath made, in praise, and in name, and in honour; and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the Lord thy God, as he hath spoken.

-Deuteronomy 26:19

All the ends of the world shall remember and turn unto the Lord: and all the kindreds of the nations shall worship before thee. For the kingdom is the Lord’s: and he is the governor among the nations.

-Psalm 22:27-28

God be merciful unto us, and bless us; and cause his face to shine upon us; Selah.
That thy way may be known upon earth, thy saving health among all nations.

-Psalm 67:1-2

I the LORD have called unto you in righteousness, and have taken hold of your hand, and submitted you as the people’s covenant, as a light unto the nations.

-Isaiah 42:6

And unto your light, nations shall walk, and kings unto the brightness of your rising.

-Isaiah 60:3

Israel in her own human strength had moments of meeting this mission. The Diaspora among the nations had the effect of spreading the word of YHWH. Thus in Acts, Jewish believers in Jesus come across Gentile worshippers of YHWH (“God-fearing Gentiles”) attached to synagogues and Jewish communities. But this work was incomplete. Jesus came to perfect the work of Israel in bringing the nations back to YHWH, and so He can be understood as Israel, God’s Son. Simeon the prophet, applied Isaiah’s language to the infant Jesus.

A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.

-Luke 2:32

Thus the writers of the New Testament applied Isaiah 53, the story of the Suffering Servant, to Jesus. It is a story Israel’s Messiah.

 

 

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Thoughts of Change

20 Friday Apr 2018

Posted by Nicholas in Faith

≈ 84 Comments

I do not know if any readers or contributors at AATW follow the YouTuber, Computing Forever. He is an ardent supporter of liberty, in particular freedom of speech, an citizen of the Republic of Ireland, who supported Brexit. He speaks intelligently, passionately, and eloquently, with a sharp sense of humour. Recently he uploaded a video on the need to protect our mental health in a time of darkness for those who love liberty.

Christians have been the canary in the coal mine when it comes to prosecution over freedom of speech. They were among the first to be hounded – now they are coming for secular conservatives, libertarians, and centrists. The war continues apace.

In my own recent economic reading (not sure if I will add to the economics series here, I started – still need to finish the Son of God series), I have been looking at the Austrian School, in particular the views of von Mises and Rothbard. When I look at the great gulf between what anarchocapitalists and libertarians advocate and our present state of affairs, I feel sad. This is made worse by concerns about another pending financial crash, which Bill Gates and Warren Buffet expect to occur within a few years (as do members of the Mises Institute): http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-01/bill-gates-says-financial-crash-certainty-reddit-ama/9500326

In spiritual thoughts, I find myself excited by a spiritual sense that the LORD is going to do a great thing to revitalise the Christians of the West – but also a sense of trepidation at the cost of it:

For it is time for judgment to begin with God’s household; and if it begins with us, what will the outcome be for those who do not obey the gospel of God?

-1 Peter 4:17, NIV

I find myself in a mixture of views. On the one hand, there is an inescapable conviction within me, perhaps fed by a comment made by Chalcedon451 a while back, that Christ meant (among other things) that He would build His Church on Peter. On the other, there is something in my convictions that leads me to conclude that somewhere along the way, the Roman Catholic Church has stumbled. At the moment, I do not see how to reconcile these views, but what I would like is help in exploring the matter. Many doctrines and practices of Catholicism that I once abjured, I now see as compatible with the Gospel, and as historic developments of seeds in the Early Church period. But I have problems with accepting that some of these practices and beliefs should be mandatory. I have no intention of going to Orthodoxy. If I were to accept some formulation of Apostolic Succession, I would not concede of Peter as being simply a primus inter pares.

In the meantime, I bumble on, occupying myself with academic work and writing here. I appreciate the opportunity I am given to write both posts and comments here. Not least, I value the companionship this place offers in a world where my basic and fundamental views put me at odds with so many people.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Democracy

17 Tuesday Apr 2018

Posted by Nicholas in Faith

≈ 52 Comments

Today in my reading on the BBC news website (I know, why would a free-market conservative read it?) I came across this article: France’s Macron urges EU to shun nationalism http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-43794856. This opening line struck me:

“there seems to be a European civil war” between liberal democracy and rising authoritarianism.

One of the reasons why so many people across a range of age groups are deserting traditional media is that they are tired of simplifications and platitudes in reporting and analysis. Rather than ask a deeper philosophical question about the problems and limits of democracy, lines like the above have the potential to dupe gullible readers into thinking that all nationalists are fascists or that democracy is inherently good.

Christianity has a concept of sin – a concept that ought not to be controversial. Simple observation and a cursory glance at 20th century history tells us that people are capable of evil – great evil. Western civilisation’s traditional doctrine of the rule of law was developed in the knowledge that man has certain inalienable rights given to him by God. The state may not behave arbitrarily against these rights – and neither may the people. A war on man’s rights – albeit a democratic war – is a war against the Creator Himself.

When parts of Europe clamour to have our rights defended, not to see them destroyed by democracy or authoritarianism, this clamour is made in the name of liberty, a concept we used to hold dear. One man’s freedom can mean another man’s bondage, however. The arguments made by many that society should accord them more things, really mean taking something away from somebody else. Each suggestion of this should not be met with servile, spineless acquiescence, but a rational examination of the motivation and justification for such a suggestion.

In taking rights away from prisoners, society is acting to uphold justice and the doctrine of individual responsibility. Everything comes at a cost; all human action is transactional. When a criminal breaks the law, he pays the price. This is what the ancient Greek expression for retribution literally means: paying the price. The justification for imprisoning convicted offenders is vindication and deterrence: evil acts should be publicly denounced as evil and people should be discouraged from doing them.

In light of the above, we must ask ourselves whether the same reasoning applies to matters such as membership of the European Union or strict border controls or state provided education. To take the first example, membership of the European Union affords a nation certain liberties, but it also deprives that nation of liberties. The nation can no longer exercise control over its borders in respect of European Union citizens; the nation cannot impose tariffs on goods imported from the European Union or decide to impose no tariffs at all on goods imported from outside the European Union. Once a Directive has been passed, an EU nation has no discretion on whether to implement it or not. Matters decided by the Court of Justice of the European Union cannot be referred to independent arbitrators. The list goes on.

In considering these restrictions, we must ask whether they are justified, and, to the extent that they affect individual rights, whether the democratic majority has the authority to infringe on the rights of individual human beings where no blameworthy act has been committed. If one wishes to argue that the will of the majority is what makes a course of action right rather than a feature intrinsic to that action, we may ask why we should accept such an axiom. Intuition seems to tell us that things are objectively right or wrong, irrespective of the wishes of the majority. Maybe it’s time for the liberal intelligentsia to listen to the reasons given by people along the spectrum of nationalists rather than accuse them all of being authoritarians. Perhaps many  – or even most – of them simply wish to defend their rights against onslaught from radical democrats and tyrannical officials.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Weigel, The Canonization of St. John Paul II, And SSPX.

16 Monday Apr 2018

Posted by Philip Augustine in Commentaries, Faith

≈ 38 Comments

Tags

Catholic, Catholicism, Christianity, George Weigel, Heaven, liturgy, Pope John Paul II, Saint, SSPX

JohnPaulII-Pope

In George Weigel’s new book ‘Lessons in Hope’ this is the primary rejection of traditionalists’ rejection of the canonization of Pope John Paul II and the Vatican II council:

“The formal investigative process included testimony from serious critics of John Paul II, including the schismatic followers of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. Their large dossier accused the Pope of just about everything in the Lefebvrist parade of horribles—but not, it seemed, liturgical abuses, thus confirming what John Paul II had said: the Lefebvrist rejection of Vatican II was primarily a matter of the Council’s endorsement of religious freedom, its openness to interreligious dialogue, and the new emphasis to placed on a Church engaging the world. (p. 334)

Of course, not all traditional Catholics are in the SSPX but their condemnations of me ring similar to those attested by myself that are full communion with Rome, as well as the Lefebvrist quoted by Weigel. And in my opinion, as I’ve heard many traditionalists in full communion with Rome mention with admiration with Marcel Lefebvre; they’re closeted support of these beliefs are deafening.

In fact, if one goes to the SSPX website on the topic of Pope John Paul II’s canonization, it’s filled in my opinion with a diatribe of illogical condemnations of the canonization of Pope John Paul II:

“If John Paul II is a saint, his theology must be irreproachable, down to the smallest detail.” (This isn’t true because the theology of Saint Augustine can be troublesome at times…)

or

“If John Paul II is truly a saint, the Catholic faithful must recognize the value of the religious witness of the Jewish people[4]. They must then condemn the example of Pedro de Arbues (1440–1485), Grand Inquisitor of Aragon, who was martyred by Jews in hatred of the Catholic faith.” (This is quite the logical leap, no one has to do anything here.)

The SSPX objection is ironically against Catholic Doctrine because when a Pope declares one a Saint he uses the language of papal infallibility publicly which the SSPX hold that the papacy cannot declare an error in their infallibility by the protection of the Holy Spirit:

“In honor of the Holy Trinity, for the exaltation of the Catholic faith and the increase of the Christian life, with the authority of our Lord Jesus Christ, of the Holy Apostles Peter and Paul and of Our Own, after long reflection, having invoked divine assistance many times and listened to the opinion of many of our Brothers in the Episcopate, We declare and define as Saint Blessed N. and inscribe his/her name in the list of the saints and establish that throughout the Church they be devoutly honored among the saints.”

The website Shamless Popery lists all sort of other reasons but theologically there’s no more convincing than the language of infallibility which leaves the SSPX and Traditionalists who claim that recent Popes who are canonized are not Saints in Heaven:

Option A: False Canonizations

Option B: Saints in Heaven

The logical implication is that the line of Popes and the doctrine of infallibility doctrine have rendered that the SSPX must accept these Popes as Saints (which will get more interesting with the future canonization of Pope Paul VI) find themselves outside of the Church by their rejection of infallibility of the magisterium.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Economic Propositions (4)

15 Sunday Apr 2018

Posted by Nicholas in Faith

≈ Comments Off on Economic Propositions (4)

The question of the nature and origin of the state is foundational to ethical, political, and economic philosophy. In assessing what the state may and may not legitimately do, one must first determine what the state is. Such discussions form the content of tomes, so it lies beyond the scope of this post to cover the matter in depth; however, it is the author’s hope that it will predict fruitful discussion.

The concept of the state presupposes the concept of authority: the state issues laws, proclamations, standards, etc, and the people comply. Authority comes from somewhere: God, the people, somewhere. The Bible teaches us that all authority comes from God (Romans 13:1), but this does not entail that all authority is exercised justly. The Bible teaches firmly against rebellion (1 Samuel 15:23), but this may not necessarily be an absolute. A more nuanced view may be that rebellion should only ever be for a just cause and only ever as a last resort and always aged according to the “civilised” code of war.

In the light of the above, toleration of unjust conduct by the state must be distinguished from approval of such conduct. Leaving aside practicalities and cowardice, which are inferior concerns, a good man will not rebel against the state over a particular infraction because he will trust in the LORD to act as vindicator and appreciate that there is a scale of iniquities. Where an infraction is of a lessor kind, armed rebellion will be a disproportionate response because of the suffering it will cause as a consequence of anarchy. Smaller forms of protest will be more appropriate in such cases.

Considering now the nature of the state, an analogy that may prove useful in understanding it is the incorporated company. A non-natural legal person can do most things that a natural person can do, but it cannot do them of itself. It is a principal and its aims are carried out by agents. The corporation is created for a particular purposes (its “objects”) and it has a constitution that governs its conduct, what it can and cannot do (memorandum, articles of association, resolutions of the board of directors, shareholders’ resolutions).

Similarly, the state behaves as if it were a person and can do many of the things a natural person can do – but not all. It acts through agents (the executive, the legislature, the judiciary) and it is bound by the decisions of its agents (in a non-lawless society) until such decisions are revoked by a higher power (e.g. a court of first instance’s decision may be reversed by a court of appeal, but until that time, the court of first instance’s decision stands). The state will have some kind of constitution: it may be written, as is the case in the USA, or it may be unwritten, as is the case in the UK. Where decisions are made that contravene the constitution they may be challenged before a body that is competent to the judge the matter (e.g. the Supreme Court in the USA and the High Court in the UK).

In the old days, before the Companies Act 2006, the objects of a company acted to some extent like a straightjacket, confining the company to particular kinds of business. If the directors or shareholders wanted to expand into a business that did not fall within the list of approved objects, it was necessary to formally amend the company’s constitution. Reflecting on this, we might ask whether some of the things that the state does today, which most people take for granted, legitimately fall within its objects. If such things do not, and never could because of some fundamental philosophical principle, then a reforming force should remove such matters from the state’s remit.

This is where issues surrounding free will, consent, tyranny, and purpose come in. The fact that God allows us to autonomously make decisions and feel the consequences of them does not entail that all of those decisions are good. In English law, directors of companies have fiduciary duties towards their companies: they must act in loyalty and good faith towards their companies, seeking its benefit.

172
Duty to promote the success of the company
(1) A director of a company must act in the way he considers, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to—
(a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term,
(b) the interests of the company’s employees,
(c) the need to foster the company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others,
(d) the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment,
(e) the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and
(f) the need to act fairly as between members of the company.

-Companies Act 2006, s170(1), via http://www.legislation.gov.uk

Similarly, the agents of the state should act in good faith towards the state, which, in a sense, is the people of the nation. In considering policies, they ought to think about the long-term benefits and costs, not only the short term. As a final thought, consider this in application to the question of money supply. If the state increases the money supply, but the demand for money stays the same, the value of the individual monetary unit will decrease. This will be a disbenefit to the people in the long-term. Would it not be better to avoid this altogether?

 

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Men in and of the Church

14 Saturday Apr 2018

Posted by NEO in Blogging, Faith, Uncategorized

≈ 31 Comments

Tags

Catholic Church, Christianity, Church Militant, history, Luther, Unmanliness

This follows on from yesterday’s points on men in the church.

The Rev Karl Hess noticed something from Mundabor’s blog (well, we are in the same business, after all)

[…]Comment Sissy showed up (nickname: “anonymous”; you never know which “anonymous” is “anonymous”) and said the critics of the Novus Ordo were uncharitable, un-this, and un-that. There had been no vitriolic comments, merely a very mild sarcasm.

A good soul, nickname “Templar” (nice one, by the way) intervened with the following words:

I grew up in New York, the Priests from my parish lived exactly 7 doors down from me and our interaction with them was daily and very personal. They were mostly Irish and Italian, most cussed like sailors (refraining only from taking the Lord’s name), used acerbic wit to cut down many a sinner, and wouldn’t back down from a fight if it came to it.

Good Bye good men.

Now we have anonymous posters who wring their hands over bruised feelings, and perceived slights. What you sow is what you reap. We have raised up milquetoast Catholics. Where is the Church Militant? Where are the Warriors? Islam is burying the world through birth rate and butchery, and us Catholics are afraid of some rough language.

The poster hits the bull’s eye in a very pithy way.

We live in times of such unmanliness that by every exchange of opinion that reaches the level of more than mild disapprobation someone – the Comment Sissy; they are everywhere – feels the need to intervene and say how “disparaging” and insensitive other people are.

In former times, such people would have been invited to go play with their dolls; nowadays, the Comment Sissy is socially accepted, and thinks he has firmly taken the moral high ground; it is like a pervert game of political correctness, in which the first one crying “disparaging” has won.

Rev Hess said it reminded him of another Catholic priest about 500 years ago.

I  have  indeed  inveighed  sharply  against  impious  doctrines,  and  I  have  not  been  slack  to  censure  my  adversaries  on  account,  not  of  their  bad  morals,  but  of  their  impiety.  And  for  this  I  am  so  far  from  being  sorry,  that  I  have  brought  my  mind  to  despise  the  judgments  of  men,  and  to  persevere  in  this  vehement  zeal,  according  to  the  example  of  Christ,  who,  in  his  zeal,  calls  his  adversaries  a  generation  of  vipers, blind,  hypocrites,  and  children  of  the  devil.  Paul  too  charges  the  sorcerer  with  being  a  child  of  the  devil,  full  of  all  subtlety  and  all  malice;  and  defames  certain  persons  as  evil  workers,  dogs,  and  deceivers.  In  the  opinion  of  those  delicate-­‐eared  persons,  nothing  could  be  more  bitter  or  intemperate  than  Paul’s language.  What  can  be  more  bitter  than  the  words  of  the  prophets?  The  ears  of  our  generation  have been  made  so  delicate  by  the  senseless  multitude  of  flatterers,  that,  so  soon  as  we  perceive  that  anything  of  ours  is  not  approved  of,  we  cry  out  that  we  are  being  bitterly  assailed;  and  when  we  can  repel  the  truth  by  no  other  pretence,  we  escape  by  attributing  bitterness,  impatience,  intemperance,  to  our  adversaries.  What  would  be  the  use  of  salt,  if  it  were  not  pungent?  or  of  the  edge  of  the  sword,  if  it  did  not  slay?  Accursed  is  the  man,  who  does  the  work  of  the  Lord  deceitfully.

From The freedom of a Christian (PDF)

I think we can all sympathize, we’ve all met the commenters, that have no facts, but are so very easily offended, and so make personal attacks. Indeed, we’ve had a few here, over the years, they rarely last long, though.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Something in the Air

13 Friday Apr 2018

Posted by NEO in Catholic Tradition, Church/State, Education, Faith

≈ 67 Comments

Tags

church, church politics, Faith, history, orthodoxy, United States

Several things caught my eye in Philip’s excellent article the other day. I hate writing posts in commboxes (although I do it far too often), so I thought I would discuss it here.

The first comes from the Catholic Herald, always a good source of information.

[O]n 8 April, I made the 2.5-hour drive to the National Shrine of Divine Mercy Shrine in Stockbridge, Massachusetts for Divine Mercy Sunday. And how could I not? Judging by the licence plates in the parking lots, pilgrims travelled from every corner of the United States. According to the programme, many more flew over from Europe. I practically live down the street.

It was a deeply moving occasion, despite Mother Nature’s lack of cooperation: it was finger-numbingly cold, with snow flurries dropping in and out. Yet 15,000 pilgrims descended on the little mountain town, bundled in parkas and blankets. Some charitable souls drifted through the crowd passing out hand warmers.

Aside from the official proceedings, what struck me most was the demographic make-up. There were Hispanics, Filipinos, Africans, and Chinese – but hardly a Caucasian in sight. That’s grossly unrepresentative of the national Catholic population: 59 per cent are white, 34 percent are Hispanic, 3 per cent are Asian, and 3 per cent are black.

Of course, this has nothing to do with race and everything to do with trends in migration. Immigrants, whatever their faith tradition, tend to be more devout than their native-born counterparts. This is true even in countries like Sweden, where predominantly-white immigrants from Poland are contributing to a boom in the Catholic population.

But are these new Catholics a permanent feature of American and Western European countries? That seems doubtful. A new Gallup polldemonstrates that the rate at which Catholics attend Mass continues to fall since 1955, from 75 per cent to 39 per cent. This, despite the fact that the nominal Catholic population has grown considerably thanks to mass immigration from South America. Meanwhile, attendance at Protestant services has remained fairly stable.

The lack of Protestant immigration actually gives them an advantage with this metric. The children or grandchildren of immigrants who stop practising the faith are more likely to identify – if only nominally – with their family’s religion. Because Catholic immigration is so high, there are many “cultural” or “lapsed” Catholics: those who identify with the Faith, but don’t attend Mass. Meanwhile, Protestants who have “un-churched” are more likely to identify as irreligious.

True enough, out here the Catholic Church is made up of probably close to a majority of Hispanics, of all ages, and who are treated quite badly by the established Anglo congregations, to the point of nearly two churches in one building. A good many of the Anglos strike me as mostly CINO’s (Catholics in name only). Given it is Hispanic immigration, I don’t see it as much in the Protestant churches but suspect it is mostly a lack of Hispanics not a difference in attitude.

The funny part is, Islam also has this problem, they too are losing the immigrants’ children.

Here, again, Pew’s study of Islam in America is enlightening. Nine per cent of ex-Muslims converted to a different faith, and one per cent said they were actively searching for a spiritual path. That means only 10 per cent remain open to engaging with organised religion. The other 90 effectively become secular or “spiritual-not-religious”, which usually amounts to the same thing.

Apparently, it is something in the air in America. part of it, of course, is the churches themselves, I’m not a particularly regular attendee myself. My local church is good on liberal platitudes, on real (what some call, muscular) Christianity, not so much. Other choices such as LCMS are quite inconvenient for me, perhaps it will solve itself, or God will show me a way, but for now, that’s how it is.

In a Federalist article, Mathew Cochrane notes that one of the weaknesses of our churches is that we are driving away men. He quotes Ross Douthat’s “God and Men and Jordan Peterson” New York Times column to good effect.

The men fled; the women stayed.

That’s the story of Easter weekend in the New Testament. Most of Jesus’ male disciples vanished when the trouble started, leaving his mother and Mary Magdalene and other women to watch by the cross, prepare his body for his burial, and then (with the men still basically in hiding) find the empty tomb.

Male absence and female energy has also been the story, albeit less starkly and dramatically, of Christian practice in many times and places since.

Except that is not true, all concerned missed the real story, didn’t they? How many times had Jesus told them he would rise from the dead? None of them, not a single one, believed Him – they went to the tomb to properly prepare his corpse and were gently chided by the Angel:

“Why do you seek the living among the dead? He is not here, but has risen. Remember how he told you, while he was still in Galilee, that the Son of Man must be delivered into the hands of sinful men and be crucified and on the third day rise” (Luke 24:5-7).

There is also this,

As one blogger quickly pointed out, two key issues with Douthat’s presentation of the story highlight a disregard for men. First is the enormous factual error: Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, both men, were actually the ones to prepare and bury Jesus’ body (John 19:38-42) while the women watched (Luke 23:55-56) and returned with additional spices several days later. Unlike Douthat, Mark the Evangelist is quite right to observe that Joseph “took courage” before going to the guy who just had Jesus executed and asking him for the corpse (Mark 15:43).

Yep, that’s how you are going to attract men, NOT.

Share this:

  • Twitter
  • Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...
← Older posts

AATW writers

  • bozoboy87
    • Catholic Mass vs Biblical Salvation
    • Behold I Stand at the Door: Bosco writes
  • chalcedon451
    • Pharisees & Popes
    • Education, what is it good for?
  • No Man's Land
    • Crowns of Glory and Honor
    • Monkeys and Mud: Evolution, Origins, and Ancestors (Part II)
  • Geoffrey RS Sales
    • Material world
    • Christianity and religion
  • JessicaHof
    • Pope Francis: reflections by Phillip Augustine
    • The problem with religion?
  • Philip Augustine
    • Weigel, The Canonization of St. John Paul II, And SSPX.
    • The Decline of Christians in the U.S.
  • NEO
    • Men in and of the Church
    • Something in the Air
  • Nicholas
    • A coming storm
    • Seeds of destruction
  • orthodoxgirl99
    • Veiling, a disappearing reverence
  • Patrick E. Devens
    • Vatican II…Reforming Council or Large Mistake?
    • The Origins of the Authority of the Pope (Part 2)
  • RichardM
    • Battle Lines? Yes, but remember that the battle is already won
  • Rob
    • The Road to Emmaus
    • The Idolatry of Religion
  • Scoop
    • Jesus & the Jewish Roots of the Eucharist
    • The Results of the Feminist Movement
  • Struans
    • Being Catholic
    • Merry Christmas Everyone
  • theclassicalmusicianguy
    • The war on charismatics
    • The problem with Protestantism

Categories

Recent Posts

  • A coming storm Wednesday, 25 April 2018
  • Seeds of destruction Tuesday, 24 April 2018
  • The Son of God (5) Monday, 23 April 2018
  • The Son of God (4) Saturday, 21 April 2018
  • Thoughts of Change Friday, 20 April 2018
  • Democracy Tuesday, 17 April 2018
  • Weigel, The Canonization of St. John Paul II, And SSPX. Monday, 16 April 2018
  • Economic Propositions (4) Sunday, 15 April 2018
  • Men in and of the Church Saturday, 14 April 2018
  • Something in the Air Friday, 13 April 2018

Top Posts & Pages

  • A coming storm
  • Seeds of destruction
  • The Decline of Christians in the U.S.
  • A decadent civilization?
  • Coherence and Mystery
  • The Son of God (5)
  • Newman and the Council

Archives

Blogs I Follow

  • Gavin Ashenden
  • Ahavaha
  • On This Rock Apologetics
  • sheisredeemedblog
  • Quodcumque
  • ignatius his conclave
  • Nick Cohen: Writing from London
  • Ratiocinativa
  • Grace sent Justice bound
  • Eccles is saved
  • Elizaphanian
  • News for Catholics
  • Annie
  • Outside In
  • Dominus mihi adjutor
  • Communio
  • Malcolm Guite
  • James Bishop's Theological Rationalism
  • LIVING GOD
  • parishLife
  • tiberjudy
  • maggi dawn
  • Equus Asinus
  • Deus Nobiscum Blog
  • thoughtfullydetached
  • A Tribe Called Anglican
  • Living Eucharist
  • The Liturgical Theologian
  • Tales from the Valley
  • iconismus
  • Men Are Like Wine
  • Acts of the Apostasy
  • www.newmanlectures.co.uk/home?format=RSS
  • Listening in the Desert
  • karenwriteshere
  • Blog of the Courtier
  • Francis Young
  • Larry Hurtado's Blog
  • Thine Own Service
  • The New Oxonian
  • Journey Towards Easter
  • The Conciliar Anglican
  • Servus Fidelis ~ The Faithful Servant
  • All Around the Western Front
  • nebraskaenergyobserver
  • The Lonely Pilgrim
  • Oxford Ordinariate Mission
  • Fr James
  • ORDINARIATE NEWS (from the Anglicanorum Coetibus Society)
  • Not For Itching Ears

Blog Stats

  • 374,677 hits

Blogroll

  • Catholicism Pure & Simple A site for orthodox Catholics, but also all orthodox Christians
  • Coco J. Ginger says
  • Cranmer Favourite Anglican blogger
  • crossingthebosphorus
  • Cum Lazaro
  • Eccles and Bosco is saved Quite the funniest site ever!
  • Fr. Z
  • Keri Williams
  • nebraskaenergyobserver
  • Newman Lectures
  • Public Catholic
  • Strict and Peculiar Evangelical blog
  • The Catholic Nomad
  • The Lonely Pilgrim
  • The Theology of Laundry

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 6,810 other followers

Twitter

My Tweets

Tags

Abortion Anglican Communion Anglicanism Apostles Atheism Baptists Bible Bunyan Catholic Catholic Church Catholicism Cavafy choices Christ Christian Christianity church Church & State Church of England church politics conservatism controversy Deacon Nick England Epistle Eucharist Evangelism Faith fiction God Grace Hell heresy history Holy Spirit Iraqi Christians Jesus Jews love Lutheran Lutheranism Marian Devotion Martin Luther mission Newman Obedience orthodoxy Papacy poetry politics Pope Francis Prayers Protestantism Purgatory religion Roman Catholic Church Salvation self denial sermons sin St. Cyril st cyril of alexandria St Leo St Paul St Peter Testimony Thanks Theology theosis Trinity Trump United Kingdom United States works writing

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.com

Blog at WordPress.com.

Gavin Ashenden

Restoring Orthodox Christianity as an Anglican

Ahavaha

Faith, Hope, Love

On This Rock Apologetics

The Faith Defended

sheisredeemedblog

To bring identity and power back to the voice of women

Quodcumque

Whatever you do, do it with your whole heart ...

ignatius his conclave

Nick Cohen: Writing from London

Journalism from London.

Ratiocinativa

Mining the collective unconscious

Grace sent Justice bound

“Love recognizes no barriers. It jumps hurdles, leaps fences, penetrates walls to arrive at its destination full of hope.” — Maya Angelou

Eccles is saved

A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you ... John 13:34

Elizaphanian

"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend." J.R.R. Tolkien <br>“I come not from Heaven, but from Essex.” William Morris

News for Catholics

SPOTLIGHTING OUR SPIRITUAL BATTLE WITH THE MODERN WORLD

Annie

Blessed be God forever.

Outside In

Dominus mihi adjutor

A monk's-eye view of things

Communio

"Behold, I have come to do your will, O God." Heb. 10:7

Malcolm Guite

Blog for poet and singer-songwriter Malcolm Guite

James Bishop's Theological Rationalism

Where Reason and Evidence Meet Faith.

LIVING GOD

Reflections from the Dean of Southwark

parishLife

...where the Gospel hits the road

tiberjudy

Happy. Southern. Catholic.

maggi dawn

Equus Asinus

A life with donkeys

Deus Nobiscum Blog

If God is with us, who can be against us?

thoughtfullydetached

A Tribe Called Anglican

"...a fellowship, within the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church..."

Living Eucharist

A daily blog to deepen our participation in Sunday Mass

The Liturgical Theologian

legem credendi lex statuat supplicandi

Tales from the Valley

"Not all those who wander are lost"- J.R.R. Tolkien

iconismus

Pictures by Catherine Young

Men Are Like Wine

- some turn to vinegar, but the best improve with age.

Acts of the Apostasy

The USO for the Catholic Church

A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you ... John 13:34

Listening in the Desert

I'm totally dependent on You, Father.

karenwriteshere

Hope isn't an emotion, but a daily choice. Keep choosing the path of hope.

Blog of the Courtier

by William Newton

Francis Young

Just another WordPress.com site

Larry Hurtado's Blog

Comments on the New Testament and Early Christianity (and related matters)

Thine Own Service

The New Oxonian

Religion and Culture for the Intellectually Impatient

Journey Towards Easter

Discovering the beauty of truth

The Conciliar Anglican

reflections on Anglican teaching and practice

Servus Fidelis ~ The Faithful Servant

Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam ~ For the Greater Glory of God

All Around the Western Front

a sanctuary and refuge where all Christian men & women of goodwill can speak their minds openly

nebraskaenergyobserver

The view from the Anglosphere

The Lonely Pilgrim

A Christian's Road Home to Rome and Journey Onward

Oxford Ordinariate Mission

News and information about the Ordinariate in Oxford

Fr James

Thoughts and Reflections of a Catholic Priest

ORDINARIATE NEWS (from the Anglicanorum Coetibus Society)

This independent website/blog provides news of the Ordinariates worldwide and the remaining Pastoral Provision communities

Not For Itching Ears

Calling the Church Back to The Cross

Cancel
%d bloggers like this: