As might be expected of it, our news media remains in “gotcha” mode, and it is swift to report acts of selfishness and greed in this pandemic. It makes, and rightly so, an exception for Health workers and those who keep the shops running; but it could, and should do more to celebrate what one might call “acts of quiet heroism.” It is in that vein that I will write about more parochial matters than usual.
Two weeks ago I came home, as usual from University; well, not quite “as usual.” The railway termini I traverse were eerily quiet, and when I bought my usual bite to eat for the train, the cheerful man at the kiosk told me he would not be working on the morrow as “business is right down.” Little did we know then what was to come, though, having a portent of it, I had taken care to pack a case as though I were going home for a vacation; though I knew that was was coming would be far from that.
Like most universities, mine exists to teach, and that teaching is mostly done face-to-face. My colleagues love their teaching and give so much to our students; but was it possible to replicate this on-line? It was with that conundrum that a few of us had been struggling for the previous two weeks. The previous day we had announced that we would be moving to on-line teaching after the week-end. It was a bold promise – could we keep it? Did it matter? This was a pandemic, surely the only thing that mattered was that people were “safe?”
As a Catholic university we celebrate our “ethos”; this would test it – and with it, us. A major restructure two years previously had done something odd for our times, it had aimed at the principle of subsidiarity – letting academics have as much freedom as possible to decide how they did what they did best. Would that survive in this time of trial? How would staff rise to the occasion? How would students respond? It was not as though most of us were adepts at this on-line learning lark. The Senior team had been meeting daily to plan for what was coming – but all I could tell my colleagues was to hold their breath and wait to see what the first week of on-line teaching would bring. As things turned out, it was the dog that did not bark in the night.
Assuredly not everything technical went smoothly, but something more important did – the spirit of generosity which we pride ourselves on cultivating. There was plenty to ignite that fractious spirit which rejoices in pointing out the shortcomings of others, and which asks why x or y was not thought of in advance, as well as more than enough material for anyone who wanted to blame someone else. None of that happened; that spirit proved to be a damp squib. Not only did colleagues prove themselves even more innovative and adaptable than even I had expected (and some of the examples we have collected of good practice are simply amazing), they were generous in mutual aid, good temper and generosity of spirit. If, as they do, times like this test whether you live your values, then colleagues – and students – came through.
Conscious that not all our students would have laptops, our IT team sourced and supplied them to those who needed it; its members went above and beyond the call of duty in helping staff and students. Our students mucked in an got on with it, responding to the evident enthusiasm and “can do” spirit of their teachers. I have never felt so proud of leading my teams.
For those students who had to stay in residence, the cleaning and catering staff continued to provide the usual service – albeit at a distance. Some of us even learned what 2 metres looks like! The security staff were there as ever, doing what they do best – providing a reassuring presence for anyone who needed it, knowing that colleagues in Counselling and Student Welfare were on hand for those who needed it.
What emerged warmed the heart. We really were a community. We pulled together with but one thought – that our students needed us and needed to continue with their studies. From the lowest to highest in the hierarchy we all served, doing whatever was necessary. We did not simply our duty, but whatever the spirit of service demanded. I had wondered what a Catholic university could look like – and amidst the fog of war I saw the vision emerge. Multiple acts of quiet heroism motivated by the ethos which tells us that everyone matters, and that there is no act of service which is too much. The chapel may have had to close, but we, those of all faiths and none, were out there evidencing the spirit of a Catholic university.
Nor, of course, are we the only ones. As I talk (remotely, of course) to colleagues elsewhere, I see the same story. Universities (and their managers) often get a bad press, and sometimes it is even deserved, but what I see (remotely) of my own university and others, makes me want to send up a quiet prayer of gratitude.
I miss walking the historic grounds of my university, and I miss my colleagues and the endless cups of coffee while we try to put things to rights, and I miss the students and their enthusiasm. But I know that these things will be there to come back to. But I know something even better, that we have drawn together as a community in a way we can all take pride in. What faces us yet, we cannot fully know, but with such a spirit, I dare hope that our patroness – the Queen of Heaven – will not think we have failed to rise to the occasion.
I really liked this post (particularly since, as a lawyer, it’s good to see you trying to comply with the terms of your contract). I hope this proves an opportunity for ministry and fellowship and perhaps even thoughts for further course design – it would be interesting to see you offer what the medieval Catholic universities did (albeit developed), the trivium and quadrivium).
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you Nicholas. I see this as another opportunity to do what is needful
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chalcedon – it is good to see you writing again. I used to enjoy your pieces and it is good to see that you are back and in form.
I’d hardly say that a university lecturer simply doing his job is an `act of heroism’ unless you are the type who is completely bamboozled by computer hardware and software – and getting to grips with the practicalities of it is heroic!
I have a question about your university, how much time you had to prepare for this and what you expected of your students.
With us, one Tuesday afternoon, three weeks into the semester, we received an email from university central stating that all face-to-face teaching had been suspended forthwith and basically telling us to deal with it.
So we had no time beforehand to prepare, or to think about it, or to plan how we were going to do our courses without the face-to-face contact.
I find that giving lectures using `Zoom’ is very OK – not as good as the real thing, but it’s OK – although I wish that they didn’t keep ramping up the security (I want to make it easier, rather than more difficult, for students to join – I don’t like finding that they keep changing the default settings, so I have to do more to let everybody participate fully – I don’t care if some unauthorised person joins; perhaps they might learn something. The academic world is different from the business world).
For the tutorials, though – there is a problem. They try writing on their smartphones and the screen is basically too small to work well with the Zoom white-board.
So I’m wondering about a practicality here – did you have time to think these things through before you sent your students home? Do you require your students to get something decent to write with (e.g. a Wacom tablet) so that they can participate in on-line tutorials? How are your people dealing with this?
Apologies for the practical and technical nature of this – but the practical aspects of this issue is basically uppermost in my mind right now.
We can discuss theology later, as and when it looks congenial to do so.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The quiet heroism is getting on with it when your own fears incline you the other way. In terms of preparation, we had a fortunate break. We had introduced a Teaching and learning capture system called Panopto and had spent the last six months helping people to get used to it. We never, of course, dreamed that we’d have to use it universally this quickly.
Most students had laptops or tablets, but we equipped those who needed them with laptops on loan. Colleagues are using a variety of method, not just, or even mainly, Zoom.
Never was an investment in technology so fortunately timed; a year ago and we’d have been stuck.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gosh – your university was very far sighted.
With us, it felt as if our vice chancellor was like Pharaoh saying, `would you be awfully kind and make some bricks? We don’t have any straw for you or anything useful like that – but we’d be delighted if you could produce the bricks anyway.’
Yes – if we had seen it coming, then we could have equipped our students with tablets (or rather – told them to buy their own tablets) and the whole business would be much better thought out – but on the whole I think it is working.
One thing at the back of my head – my first few remote lectures were somewhat hesitant, but now I get the impression that it is working quite well. I wonder if things will ever be the same again once people understand that you can listen to a lecture and (crucially) participate in the discussion in the comfort of your own living room?
It isn’t clear that this lock-down will be finished by exam time. Our minister of education has declared that we’ll examine the students anyway. I’m wondering how this is going to happen – that may be real heroism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We were fortunate. It was something I’d wanted to bring in for a year or so, and I’m glad we got approval when we did. Glad your efforts are working. I have a major amendment to regulations going through on Monday allowing lecturers to examine in any way they see fit. We have to help our students progress/graduate.
It will be interesting to see if there’s any long-term effect here.
All the best, Jock, and stay safe 🙏🏼
LikeLike
… we don’t have this difficulty (rules and regulations), because in our system, the examiner can examine the students in any way he sees fit. We are supposed to declare at the beginning of the course (before the students sign up) something about the nature of the assessment, but that is rather loose
But even with complete freedom (as examiner), it’s still a bit of a challenge to find a good replacement for a 4-hour sit-down exam. I suppose it will have to be something like take-home exam (and then the nature of the problems will have to be different) followed by half an hour on skype with each student (to make sure that what they submit really is their own work).
Yes – and may you stay safe and well too! And may God be with you.
LikeLike
It’s been my (and often written about) experience that adversity makes or breaks an organization. There’s a reason why our Marines always stood for the old China Marines and for the guys on Guadalcanal. Plenty of examples in British history, as well, including 1940.
Without knowing much of your University, I do know this, the fact that you are doing so well is a function of leadership, well applied.
We in the west have had it awfully easy for quite a while, and I wonder if it has softened us, then I see stories like this, and I think, nope, we’re still who we’ve always been.
Well done, or at least started, old friend. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, Neo. We are holding our own for now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good enough, for now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, indeed. The media, of course, continues to carp and moan, but then there are reasons few pay any attention to it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quite a few of them, starting with outright lies and going up from there. Well, they assuredly planted the wind, I think I see an approaching whirlwind. Couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed – dreadful shower!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed so.
LikeLike