Tags
BBC, Catholic Church, Catholicism, Christianity, controversy, Shoddy journalism, St Pope John Paul II
For many of us in this country, the BBC’s Panorama programme has been a beacon of why it is worth paying a licence tax to support a public broadcasting organisation; it, and Radios 3 and 4 have long been, for some of us, the only real justifications: after Monday night only the radio remains. On Monday night the programme descended into a gutter of slime, innuendo and suggestio falsi in connection with St Pope John Paul II. To what ought to be his eternal shame, a formerly well-respected, Catholic educated journalist, Ed Stourton, put together a programme of such poor quality that I shall be using it with my graduate students to show them how one should not use evidence.
One imagines there must have been some excitement when the BBC programme makers heard that Ed had access to ‘intimate’ (their words) letters written by Pope John Paul II to a woman. There was, of course, ‘no suggestion’ he had ‘broken his vow of celibacy’, but, and here comes the innuendo which inevitably follows such a disclaimer – they were ‘intense’, and the two went on ‘camping trips’ and she was an ‘attractive woman’, and it was ‘an intense relationship’, and she ‘seems to have had intense feelings’ and he ‘struggled to make sense of their relationship in Christian terms’. Setting aside the cheap sexism (if she had been ‘unattractive’ would that somehow have made a difference?) and the guessing (from what was revealed, it seems St John Paul had no difficulty at all), we get the steady drip, drip of innuendo – an impression of much smoke, encouraging the belief that there must be some fire somewhere. A decent historian, faced with the clear fact that the letters are not in the slightest bit salacious and contain not a whiff of scandal, might have pointed to the fact they are not the only letters the Pope wrote to close women friends, and written a proper documentary around the intellectual companionship and support such correspondence provided – but where are the viewing figures in that? Of course, the BBC, as a public broadcaster, uses that fact to claim it does not need to chase the ratings, but give it a chance to, and it dives to the bottom of the gutter like a rat down a drain.
The programme managed an impressive line-up of liberal ‘Catholics’, some, like the former seminarian, John Cornwell, already well-versed in making money from misrepresenting the history of the Church (he is the author of a bad book on Pius XII and the holocaust). There was a former Polish Jesuit who might, to be fair, as well have still been a Jesuit, as he managed to say all sorts of critical stuff about John Paul – not that he actually knew anything, but he was Polish. It was a particular sadness to see an historian I much respect, Eamon Duffy, with this sad crew of the discontented. I did not know whether to laugh of cry when he said that had the existence of the letters have been known, it might have had an effect on the canonisation process – before going on to say that it might only have slowed it down a bit, which might be no bad things given the haste; not, of course, a word about St John XXIII.
What do we know know that we did not know? Not much. It has been clear for sometime that the BBC is bent on squandering whatever might be left of its reputation as a leading broadcaster, so we should not be surprised at this piece of slime. It has also long been clear that the BBC is religiously illiterate enough to suppose that Ed Stourton and his liberal chums speak for the Catholic Church. We should, I suspect, be surprised that the ‘Today programme’ on Radio 4 gave the excellent Fr Alex Lucie-Smith and Caroline Farrow all of five minutes to comment on what nonsense the programme had been – but then 8.55 on radio and peak time TV for half an hour hardly constitutes balance.
Oh yes, and we learnt something else we already knew. St John Paul II was one of the most remarkable figures of the late twentieth century and a man whose moral stature the BBC is signally unfit to judge.
Dave Smith said:
The Bosco Broadcasting Corporation did indeed strike again without any sense whatever of the content of the letters or of the correspondence. It reminds one of the insinuations that Bosco makes of Blessed John Cardinal Newman and I dare say if anyone looked at the letters of a St. John of the Cross or St. Padre Pio they would find much the same. Shameful indeed and a sad commentary of the gullibility of the people who now find themselves relishing yellow journalism. And to think these people vote!
LikeLiked by 3 people
NEO said:
Quite. I tend to watch (and listen to) a fair amount of BBC news. Why? Because, unlike American media, it is quite easy to discern its bias, and still collect better world news than we get from ours. That said, It strikes me that much like the American media, the BBC has begun to believe its own BS (or maybe just quit caring about anything else).
Sad, like so many my age, one of the first thrills for me of shortwave radio was to get the actual legendary BBC news. But it’s become just another lying dinosaur, like all of what we call over here, the lame stream media. Seems to me that radio is treading the same path, yes Fr Lucie-Smith and Caroline Farrow are quite wonderful. It must be very hard for them to breathe in that swamp.
I also note from what I’m reading, that there is absolutely no hope of improvement. I think a proper conservative government would simply cancel renewing its charter, it does no service to either the party or the UK anymore. Best to let it die a peaceful death.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Jock McSporran said:
I wouldn’t worry about this. A disclaimer: I don’t have a TV and didn’t watch it. But I gather they did state that he kept his vow of celibacy. It will have done the RCC no harm at all if people get the impression that the pontiff fell in love with – a woman!
I’m reminded of Captain Shaw:
Oh! Captain Shaw!
Type of true love kept under!
Could thy brigade with cold cascade
Quench my great love, I wonder?
As every Gilbert and Sullivan buff knows, Captain Shaw was the head of the London Metropolitan fire brigade, who refused to marry the woman of his dreams because she was above his station in life.
LikeLiked by 1 person
NEO said:
Actually, it does. I disagree with Rome on celibate (and unmarried) clergy. But, as long as that is its policy, and the vow that a priest takes, it matters quite a lot that he lives up to it. Justice Scalia once said that character is the only thing that is not for sale, and that is what’s at stake here.
And fraudulent stories like this Panorama, on what once was a respected medium like the BBC, hurt it, if only by innuendo amongst people less well informed than those here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jock McSporran said:
I thought it stated that there was no suggestion that he wasn’t celibate. I thought the suggestion was that he rather liked the woman, but even though he liked the woman, he didn’t do anything about it.
I didn’t watch the programme, though.
LikeLiked by 1 person
NEO said:
Actually, I didn’t either, nor do I intend to. But as C. intimated, there have been rumors swirling about for at least a fortnight, and they were quite sleazy, indeed.
LikeLike
eileen shaw (@eileenshaw9) said:
Edward Stourton was also given 45 minutes on radio 4 this morning to doggedly pursue his analysis of letters, this man’s personal views on the subject are contemptible and besmirch a good and holy man, for whenever Saint John Paul’s name comes forth in the future these letters will be alluded to, such is the ugly nature of the media.
LikeLiked by 4 people
chalcedon451 said:
One of the few good arguments against Catholic education is it produced men like Sourton and Cornwell.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Philip Augustine said:
I think we should ask and explore all the facets of what the gain is to report this ‘intense’ relationship. I would imagine some of it is connected to some of these liberal ‘Catholics’ using such faux investigative reporting to promote their agenda within the Church. The Church has a high moral standard when it comes to sexuality and Pope St. John Paul II is the Catholic theologian most responsible for it in the 20th century. So he’s become the target and the collateral damage.
However, I think the proper response should be to these proposed allegation–more or less that’s what they are to trump up scandal. It should be dismissed on the grounds that Karol Wojtyla’s struggle with sin in the world (which is simply apathy to their allegation) is no different than any Catholics and that they simply are just confirming a fact that the faithful already know.
LikeLiked by 3 people
chalcedon451 said:
Spot on – that is precisely what they are up to.
LikeLiked by 3 people
famphillipsfrancis said:
Thanks Chalcedon; an excellent blog about a wretched programme. When I saw John Cornwell make an early comment on the programme, I groaned. He not only wrote the appalling “Hitler’s Pope” about Pius XII, but also “The Pope in Winter” – making similar quite unfounded allegations about JP II and his ‘close relationships’ with women – and another book about Cardinal Newman, making all kinds of insulting and misleading insinuations about Newman’s friendship with Fr Ambrose St John. He simply makes money out of baseless sexual innuendoes about those who cannot defend themselves. Stourton – what can one say? But it was disappointing to see Duffy with that duo – although he does write for The Tablet.. There is a recent fine book written by a Pole – Wlodzimierz Redzioch – called “Stories about John Paul II”, which has a chapter by another woman friend of the Pope’s, Wanda Poltawska. It shows that J P II had the priestly, psychological and emotional maturity to have good friendships with women and to be comfortable about this,without a whiff of the salaciousness that the BBC drums up. As George Weigal told Radio 4: “The Pope had friends!” But I think the woman in question here, Anna T, betrayed the friendship by selling the letters. If the Pope had been alive this would have been seen by him as a betrayal. If she thought they were of general importance she should have instructed that they be sent to the National Library of Poland for free, to be opened at a future date; if she thought they were a private correspondence (as they were) she should have burnt them. 30 pieces of silver, eh?
LikeLiked by 4 people
chalcedon451 said:
I fear some of them would sell the Church down the river for free. I was sorry to see Eamon, whom I know and like, involved.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gareth Thomas said:
Curiously, the BBC R4 programme “The Pope’s Letters” from this morning won’t play on i-Player. http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/player/b072jknz However, the two programmes either side of it (Today Programme and Woman’s Hour) are easily played. Has the programme been taken down, I wonder?
LikeLiked by 2 people
chalcedon451 said:
It was put on as a ‘special’ – I guess they paid Ed a lot to do it and want a return on their thirty pieces of silver.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bosco the Great said:
This seems like a good time to hoc my Delux Johnpaul II Penance Kit.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
It would be a good time to accompany it by putting a sock in it 🙂
LikeLike
Gareth Thomas said:
You ARE the penance kit, Bosco, and we must have sinned gravely to have earned you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bosco the Great said:
Youre rite, for a change.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
Looks like youre having trouble with the British Boscos. Its like “Whack-a-Bosco”…You wack one Bosco into his hole, and another Bosco pops up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
chalcedon451 said:
Just need to call pest control 🙂
Really glad to hear your news about your daughter – must be a relief for you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bosco the Great said:
Thank you good brother. I stood on the promise that my house would be saved. I knew He wouldn’t go back on his Words, like we humans do. Yes, its a relief. Now, I don’t care what happens to me. The world is going to hell all around us. Let it go. The saved will be taken befor the Man of Sin can be revealed. Its a relief to know she wont have to get salvation the hard way, by beheading. But they imprison you befor beheading you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bosco the Great said:
LikeLike