“Rich man, poor man, Beggar man, thief, Doctor, lawyer, Indian chief.”
“Narcissist, Feminist, Wiccan in Chief, Globalist, Marxist and Papal Thief.”
He keeps us guessing doesn’t he? Kissing muslim feet on Holy Thursday, cozying up to Jeffrey Sachs and the Italian abortionist, hugging a defrocked gay priest and his new male “marriage partner”, covering for Uncle Ted McCarrick, silence on the dubia and the sex scandals, annihilation of souls etc. etc. etc.
And of course we had the lovely crucifix on the hammer and sickle routine and now we have the Pope at the Youth Synod carrying around a Wiccan stang instead of a crozier and saying Mass with that occult item as well. Is there anything this man will not do to scandalize the faithful?
See these links:
Satanists Manifesting: Antipope Bergoglio Carries a Stang – the Ritual Staff of Witchcraft
Wiccan Stang Given to Antipope Bergoglio By Woman Wearing Wiccan Red String Bracelet
What is that? #Synod2018 – UPDATED – EXPLAINED and EXPLAINED MORE
https://wdtprs.com/blog/2018/10/what-is-that-synod2018/embed/#?secret=WvXb1RE7g7
Is this another completely innocent thing that he is being unjustly accused about? Hmmm . . . I wonder what everybody thinks about this.
All Along the Watchtower 
Aye, why would a Satanist staff bother you all of a sudden? The Lord God the Pope carries a well known Satanist symbol, the bent crooked cross with a grotesque Jesus on it. I know you’ve seen it. Good brother Servus tried to explain it away by telling me that it was dropped. The Holy Father sat on a chair that had an upside down cross on it. A well known Satanist symbol. You can see it in my upside down site……cherrybombcoutour.blogspot.com……sign in and become a member. Find rest for your soul.
LikeLike
I think what a number of these incidents illustrate is that we must distinguish between the objective and the subjective. I am not convinced that Pope Francis is intentionally setting out to destroy Catholicism. I rather suspect that he thinks what he is doing reflects Christian principles: reaching out to the marginalised; being all things to all men; showing compassion; having humility. However, his “good intentions” do not entail that his actions are objectively right. As you say, they scandalise not only Catholics, but conservative Christians of all stripes. If he is failing to respond adequately to politely-worded objections that lay out precise grounds for complaint, then that raises other issues about leadership and his feelings about orthodoxy and tradition. Of course, he may have responded privately to a number of complaints – we cannot know. But the seriousness of some of these incidents really requires public retractions or qualifications; otherwise, people will continue to be in doubt, and that is in no one’s interest.
This does also raise questions about the papacy as an office. I recall some time back that Chalcedon451 wrote a post about Pope Francis’ attitude being something like, “I am the Pope; no one can question me.” I cannot say whether this is true or not, but the failure to publicly respond to a number of objections suggests that he has an attitude something like this. He may well justify that attitude as a requirement to preserve the power of his office – too many retractions and it will seem like there is no point in having a Pope at all.
I do not think anyone can be truly impartial in assessing all of this material. As a Protestant, I naturally will want to raise fundamental objections about Catholicism as a whole, and these will colour my assessment of the situation. Similarly, the Orthodox will probably say that the Schism is to blame for the degeneration of the Patriarchate of Rome. Traditional(ist) Catholics will also be emotionally disturbed by “heresy” and “syncretism” and “apostasy”, so their objectivity could be questioned too. Nevertheless, this is an important matter and cannot go without comment. What I will say is that this sort of behaviour by the Pope – to the extent that it is real and attested -will be a barrier to true fellowship among Christians of different denominations. I have no desire to have dealings with Catholic officials because they will be obliged to toe the party line, and I have no interest in listening to feeble justifications for this kind of behaviour.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My impression is that either he is the most incompetent bumbling oaf that ever was elected to the papacy or he is a cunning pretender to the throne and is doing the bidding of his enablers.
LikeLiked by 2 people
There is a law out there, I’ve forgotten the name, but anyway, that the simplest explanation is usually correct.
That, to me, indicates a small man elevated far beyond his competence and seeking approval wherever he can find it. It also indicates a small man that so often he attempts to invoke hidden authority in an authoritarian manner.
A small man in a very big job. I don’t think he is necessarily evil, although his actions often have evil results.
We have seen much of it in recent years, in the Pope, in Obama, and in May, as well.
A time of great events and small men, as Churchill described the World War I generation.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think yours a very plausible explanation and yet, and yet . . .
There is something rather sinister afoot (throughout the world . . . and now in the churches as well). Seems that narcissists as a whole are smarter than most people, more cunning, more conniving and they love to get away with things the ordinary man cannot get aways with in full view of the world . . . the elite status we see displayed in so many pols these days. He seems, in fact to me, to be a pol of sorts and an extremely controlling personality. He will turn negative press on its head and tell them that what they saw was not a negative but a positive good . . . that he is acting as Christ would etc. We’ve seen it over and over again in this man and his anger and revenge against those who dare even question him civilly. So I am not so sure he is as dumb as his actions seem to sane onlookers. He seems to turn everything into a “God of surprises” which he is only the instrument for revealing them. And didn’t he, early on, declare his humility to the world. I was always taught that a proud boast of such is a sure sign of the opposite. But the press agreed with the man and that is what we heard from them as they supported this left wing supporter of their progressive globalist agendas.
LikeLiked by 2 people
He’s far from dumb (sadly) or stupid which is actually what you meant. He’s plantty smart, but without character to provide grounding. He might have been a pretty good parish priest, but being a bishop was a promotion too far.
For the most part, I agree with you, he has done untold evil, and as Nicholas pointed out, not only to Catholics but to all orthodox Christians, and yes, it was all magnified by the press, which should surprise no one at all.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aye, my friend, it is a dreadful situation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed – though some of that is probably attributable to the apparatchiks in the Vatican and Curia rather than him personally. In a way, this is more scandalous than Alexander VI – he did bad things, but he wasn’t confusing in his preaching. His preaching was fairly uncontroversial.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Very true, that. This man is prone (by many who attest to it) to fits of rage and outbursts, throwing things and screaming obscenities. Civility is not one of his strong suits it appears . . . at least in private and often not in public either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How has it come to this? Well, it cannot last forever.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, nothing in our temporal world does but great damage can ensue and wreak havoc for a very long time before the fires and put out and order is restored.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It makes you wonder what is going on with BXVI.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is the $64,000 question of course. We all have our hunches and reasons for our answers to that one . . . but in truth we may never know what, in fact, truly happened. For me, the Vatileaks Scandals and the 300 page report which has not yet surfaced probably hold some vital keys to his stepping down . . . but will we ever see it? Is is protected under the penalty of a Pontifical Secret?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m not happy about what’s going on in the CofE either. I’ve been soured on it since reading Archbishop Cranmer and hearing Gavin Ashenden.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I cooled from them several years ago as they began their movement toward a more secular morality and began tolerating the sin rather than the sinner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It seems al the old structures are being torn apart.
LikeLiked by 1 person
. . . and it does seem that it is almost orchestrated and planned. One would think that many of the churches are following the same playbook and I have a good idea who wrote that book as I am sure you do as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes – “Rules for Radicals”, anyone? I’ll take hemlock with mine…
I am afraid evil always finds away of twisting the structures and principles that good creates to its own ends. Look at what the feminists have done to Kavanagh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Classic for our day and age.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nicholas, I thought this article today at CWR was interesting when one starts examining a dystopian world: https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2018/10/05/how-a-dystopian-novel-from-1907-can-challenge-catholics-in-2018/
LikeLike
I’ll have a look.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just read the article. Some interesting comments and I suppose the end-times element made you think of me. One thing struck me in particular though – it resonated with my longstanding attitude of separating essential from non-essential, contingent from necessary, permissible from mandatory. This underlying structure is actually one of the reasons why I am, and remain, a Protestant, and why I believe in the non-denominational unity movement, which I think will be crucial in the last days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well there are good times and bad times and one must adapt. I have read of the brave priests in the gulags who got by with the bare essentials to offer Mass to the other prisoners etc. It will be the same, in my estimation, once the full frontal battle against God and religion begins. We are hated by the world and always were and there is no reason to expect that the end will be any less horrific than was the persecution of the Church under the Romans. Becoming Pope was almost a given for being a martyr in the early history of the Church.
But in the good times, as would be expected, we offer the best that we have to God and spare no expense; it is like the woman who used the spikenard on Christ’s feet. It is fitting to do so when we are able . . . but when not, we are able to give what we have which might only be our miserable lives; putting them at risk for the sake of worshipping the One True God.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wondering if your Lord God the Pope is stupid? Hahahahahahaaaaa. No….hes very smart. He sits on top of the richest cash cow org on the planet. They have nothing but money and it keeps rolling in.Thats why they can indulge their fantasies, because they have time and unlimited money.Bishops and archbishops live in splendor. Its just now because of journalists snooping around that more dirt is being dished up. All the other Holy Fathers did ungodly things, but you don’t hear much about it…like good brother Ratziner sending memos to all bishops to keep molestation info from the local gendarmerie. Now , for some reason, its bothering cathols. Cathols put up with their molesting priests for 1700 yrs. I say….forget it and go on with your lifes. Molestation is part and parcel of being catholic.
LikeLike
Hahahahahaaaaa. I just learned more about the Satanist staff your Lord God the Pope is holding. Its the staff of Bacchus , the god of homosexuality. Also, for those of you Mary worshipers who have any memory left, you would recall that I have exposed the pine cone staff that your Holy Father holds is the staff of Bacchus. You have close ups of that staff on this site. You can clearly see the pine cone under the bent crooked cross, another Satanist symbol. Ive beed telling you Diana worshipers that for yrs, but you wouldn’t believe me. Hahahahahahahaaaaa. Enjoy Pope Bacchus….Hahahahahahahaaaaa.
LikeLike