If we piece together what happened to the Apostles after the death of Jesus, we find yet another significance in the Resurrection, for it seems plain enough from St John’s account that they initially went back to their old work. Jesus – whom we note is still not recognisable on sight to his followers – is on the shore in the early morning light when Peter, John, Thomas and Nathaniel come back from a fruitless night’s fishing. It sounds as if, at this stage, the Apostles were far from being in full-time ministry. Once more we note that it was the voice of Jesus which was recognised first, and that it was John who noticed it first. How typical was Peter’s response – to rush into the water to get to Jesus as fast as possible after the fish had been caught where Jesus said they would be. Once more we note, too, that it was in the communion of food that the disciples knew him.
The parallel with the first calling of Peter and Andrew strikes the attentive reader, as does that with our own reaction. How often are we like the Apostles – with him close to us and yet we do not see him? For all the criticism which we might make of Peter on the night the Lord was taken, it is he who, through his love, plunges into the water to get to Jesus first; can we say as much? It is the prelude to the restoration of Peter we see in verses 15 to 19. Great love has a great reward – but with that, as Jesus warns, comes great responsibilities. Peter’s life henceforth will not be that of the hardy fisherman on the sea of Tiberias, and that life will be lived not as his will wanted, but as God’s will dictates; are we ready for that?
The memories were fond ones for St John, who evokes so well the atmosphere of that early morning. In the distribution of the bread and fish, we are reminded of the feeding of the five thousand. Though we, like the Apostles, might have but small faith, it is the Lord who will provide. Guided by themselves alone, their night’s fishing was fruitless – guided by the Lord, their nets bulged. In the night, lit only by the lights of our small understanding, few come into the nets, but, as St Gregory Palamas noted, when the morning comes, with the Light of the World, then in his teaching we triumph. That requires of us a faith which tells us not to listen to the siren voices of the world, and still less to the devices and desires of our own hearts. It reminds us too that however hard we labour, if it is not in the Lord’s name, it will be in vain.
So it was that the Apostles were made fishers of men. They dod not yet know how they would be supported in this, but they had faith that they would be. That morning meeting marked the point at which the Apostles would turn aside from their old work and truly become fishers of men.
Candia said:
Mmm…interesting.
You might enjoy my poem St Peter’s Fish, in the Poetry section of my site.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Servus Fidelis said:
Indeed we are back to being fishmongers, feeding people worldly fish. We seem to have forgotten who we are supposed to be and for what we are supposed to be working for:
“Do not work for the food that perishes, but for the food that endures for eternal life, which the Son of Man will give you.”
LikeLike
dbmw said:
We are to be testifiers of the Gospel. We are called to use are God given talents. Not all are called to stand on the street corner and bellow like at Speaker’s Corner. Nor are we called to hit the non-believing stranger over the head on our first encounter. Rather, conversion comes quietly though with perseverance by example and occasionally by introducing the subject.
As my father would exclaim, “Softly,softly, catchee monkey.” ( have no idea where that expression came from.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
1catholicsalmon said:
A comforting post.
LikeLiked by 1 person
chalcedon451 said:
Thank you/
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
Did the apostles move into the Apostolic Palace?
LikeLike
Carl D'Agostino said:
No, first they went to the men’s clothing store for hats, fancy robes and then to the jewelry story for fancy rings and soon later great palaces were built in which they lived. You know how it is – the “tradition” thing.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
The Vatican investigated the group for three years and then in 2012 issued a stinging report saying the LCWR had “serious doctrinal problems” and promoted “radical feminist themes incompatible with the (Roman) Catholic faith”.
The Vatican criticized the group for taking a soft line on issues such as birth control
and homosexual activity.
http://news.yahoo.com/activist-u-nuns-concessions-vatican-investigation-142345318.html
lets take stock.The nuns are solidly lesbians, but they are to teach catholic teaching. The priests are solidly homosexual, but catholic teaching must be kept. So, the clergy can all be homosexual as long as they teach against it.
LikeLike
Carl D'Agostino said:
CHAL “So it was that the Apostles were made fishers of men. They dod not yet know how they would be supported in this, but they had faith that they would be.’
That’s faith alright.
LikeLike
dbmw said:
It’s delightfully noticeable that the comments by St. Bisto have, until recently, been ignored.
LikeLiked by 1 person
chalcedon451 said:
There really is no point, I fear. It is like talking to a speak your weight machine – but not as useful in the outcome 🙂
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
My question is valid. I want to know if the apostles stayed in the Apostolic Palace.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
And does the Palace have a chef full time?
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
That I’ve no idea about.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
As it wasn’t built, no. Their successors did.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
There are several residences meant for the reigning pope and the Apostolic Palace is among the places where the Pope spends most of his time. once a new pope is elected, he takes over the Apostolic Palace as his residence. Some of the popes liked to spend time reflecting in the gardens within the Apostolic Palace. The Apostolic is also where several administrative meetings of the Vatican take place.
http://vatican.com/articles/info/the_apostolic_palace-a1081
Ah, the Popes can genuflect in the gardens.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
The article says Pope Sixtus started building the Apostolic Palace. I guess he used the money from his brothels that the clergy frequented, during a long ago time when they liked women, and all the money from the sale of indulgences.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
Fishers of Men
A Catholic priest in training came out as gay on Friday, saying his sexuality shouldn’t define him before God and calling for the Church to be more welcoming to outsiders.
Damian Torres-Botello, who, like Pope Francis, is a member of the Jesuit order, published an essay in the Jesuit Post this morning entitled “This I Believe: Created in God’s Image.” The article, which was reportedly approved by Torres-Botello’s superiors, describes his initial struggles with discerning a call to ministry
Although Torres-Botello’s public profession of his sexuality is highly unusual for a priest in training — especially with the consent of church leadership — it’s not necessarily a direct violation of Catholic teaching
(yes, they usually wait till they are full fledged priests befor they “let it fly”)
http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2015/04/17/3648333/catholic-priest-comes-gay-says-church-welcoming/
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
Goodness me, Bosco, fancy that, someone confessing to being a sinner. It must be so good to be the one without sin and be able to cast so many stones. And yet the Bible says only Jesus was without sin. Are you Jesus that you cast so many stones? Or are you a Pharisee, a whited sepulchre with rotting things inside? Looking forward to your answering a question for once.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
This isn’t just anyone confessing to being a sinner. What makes this news worthy is that his superiors are OK with him. The CC is pretending to be anti gay when most of the clergy is gay. Here in San Fran, the bishop is prtending to be anti gay. According to you, since im a sinner, I shouldnt say anything, or cut and paste news stories. Or post only happy stories. Well, this is a happy story. A gay human being comes out of the closet and now feels relief that he doesn’t have to sneak around anymore. Just so happens hes in Jesuit school and is going to be a priest sometime soon.
The cardinals all meet discuss if they should be more tolerant of gays. That’s an affront to rank and file cathols everywhere. They are lying to them. They themselves are a bunch of homosexuals.
Is this where you trust your salvation?
You are correct. there is one who doesn’t deceive or sin….Jesus. Hes there outside your door knocking.
Well, by your logic, the cardinals and bishops shouldn’t say anything about gay priests. Just let them let them leap and prance all thru the CC. The man in the pews never has minded. But the nagging problem of this “church teaching” that the CC waves around to prove they are gods true church, is haunting them. They certainly cant say…”look how holy we are”. The best they can do is say….”look at what we say”. All the while Jesus is at your door knocking.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
As usual, you seem not to grasp the point. What does the priest mean when he says he is ‘gay’? If he was practising homosexuality he would have been suspended, therefore the likelihood is he is a celibate one. Could you point me to where Scripture says celibate homosexuals are to be stoned by clowns? Many thanks in advance.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
good question. If he says hes gay but doesn’t act on it, is he guilty of homosexuality. he says hes homosexual…he likes his own kind. The bible say that his conscience has been seared over with a hot iron. Yes, he is homosexual even if he never acts on it. Should I stone him? I never even entertained the thought. Im just as guilty of sin as him. But heres my point, ….. a priest is suppose to be a man of god. The CC says homosexuals cannot be priests. yet the ranks of catholic priests are swollen with gays. What else are they lying to you about? My guess is……everything. A corrupt tree brings forth corruption. Are you hitching your wagon to a corrupt ship? You say….well look at what the CC teaches. We all have the bible in our house somewhere, and it teaches us all we need to know. The CC doesn’t have any exclusive claims on whats in the bible. The devil waves the bible around. The CC and the devil have something in common….they both lie to deceive people. The wolves have put on sheeps clothing and are telling everyone to “come on in, the waters fine”. We are cleaning up the catholic church…getting rid of molesters and gay priests. Come on all you sheeple, we are the new and improved catholic church.
Is this really what you want? Whats wrong with opening the door to Christ? Just you and him, nobody else. You are responsible for your salvation.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
You are missing the point. If he is celibate, then he is not committing a sin.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
You are stuck on the letter of the law. But you still attend a church where people bow befor the works of their hands. Jesus said that we don’t have to do the do. If we look on another person with lust we have committed the sin. But the bible is a dead letter to catholics. Don’t feel bad. Its a dead letter to all the unsaved all over the world.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
As you keep proving because you don’t understand it in the slightest.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
I might not understand the bible, but I don’t belong to a religion that has its flock bowing befor the works of mens hands. Its hard not to murder. Its hard not to cheat on your wife when a pretty girl throws herself at you. Its hard not to steal when the opportunity arises. Its hard not to take the Lords name in vain. But its the easiest thing in the world to walk away from some phoney religion. It takes no effort.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
Do it then Bosco – you are trapped in a cult of one which means you have to keep denying the plain words of Jesus. The devil uses your pride to keep you in chains – reject him.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
So, the devil has me. ill agree to that somewhat. the devil has my lusts of the flesh, but he cant unsave me. its a war.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
Well, that’s surely what the devil wants you to believe. If you believe him, he’ll be very pleased.
LikeLike