If we move away from the frustration we sometimes feel at how little the Evangelists tell us and concentrate on what they do tell us, then we can see the lessons which lie there for every generation. Mainly patriarchal societies have tended to focus on the men in the Bible, but the Church founded by Christ, however patriarchal the societies to which it has ministered, and however patriarchal it has been, has never been able to escape the influence of the Mother of Jesus. Mary stands there at the beginning of the story, even as she is there at its ending – and beyond.
Luke tells us that his Gospel is based on lots of evidence, including first-hand accounts, and there is nowhere else but Mary that the story he recounts in the first chapter of his Gospel could have originated; how marvellous to think that here we hear the voice of the Mother of Jesus. How understated and how modest is the person were there encounter; but how courageous. Where the father of John the Baptist, a Levite and one used to the Holy Places of the Temple doubted, and was struck dumb by the Angel of the Lord, Mary, who was, we must recall, probably only 14 or so at the time, responds with modesty – and courage.
She was a virgin, and if the accounts which date from as early as the second century are to be credited, she was a consecrated virgin; she did not see her life panning out as it did for most women of her kind; God had other ideas. Mary knew she could not be pregnant; like most girls growing up in the country, she would have known how babies were made. But the Angel told her that she was most ‘highly favoured’, and that she had been chosen by God to be the other of His Son.
We cannot know the turmoil this must have caused her. In that moment her life had been entirely turned around; whatever her plans, God’s plan came first. The ramifications of the words of the Angel were, perhaps mercifully, hidden from her. She would soon encounter the very first of them when her betrothed, thinking she had betrayed him, decided to set her aside. What a world of pain is hidden in that account in Matthew. According to the Law of Moses, Mary could have been stoned for adultery; we are not, here, far from the sort of society which we see in modern Pakistan’s Tribal regions. It was a mark of the righteousness of Joseph that he was not minded to put her to shame, or have her stoned; in that society it was a kindness to ‘set her aside’. We can only imagine the conversations and the pain it caused Mary and Joseph. But God, who had given Mary her mission, also now gave Joseph his; he was to protect the child of God and of Mary.
If we know precious little of Our Lady, how much less do we know of Joseph? Again, if we are to credit tradition going back to the time, rather than the later tales of men with an agenda, Joseph was an older man, one who may already have had children by a first marriage, some, perhaps all, of whom were older than Mary. So he had seen much, and this, too, in a quiet, and manly way, he accepted. It was not just Our Lady who assented to the word of God, Joseph did so too.
We may know little of this man, but we know enough to appreciate that Joseph was truly righteous. He stood by his pregnant betrothed, went with her to Bethlehem, was there at the birth, and led them into Egypt to escape from Herod’s men. When they returned, he earned a living for his new family, and was there at least for the first twelve years of Jesus’ life. The Jesus we see when his mission began was the Son of the Most High and of His blessed mother; but it is not, I hope, too fanciful to see in his courage, his steadfastness and his loyalty and love, reflections of his step-father’s character.
God’s words were, to them, Law; let us follow – if we can.
NEO said:
Seems to me that we don’t speak enough of Joseph, takes quite a man, on the words of an angel, to take a pregnant girl to wife, and to uproot his life to go to Egypt to protect his foster son and all the rest.
I think we would be wise if we followed his example, as closely as we can, because there have been no more quietly faithful men. I’d call him a hero.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
Me too, Neo, and he seemed timely after your post the other day. He is, if you like, the ‘ordinary Joe’ – who when called on, can do the most extraordinary things.
LikeLike
NEO said:
He is indeed, seemingly plucked out almost at random, we know so little, and yet he simply and quietly got on with the job, successfully, no matter what it entailed. He was in my mind some as I wrote that post as well.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
I did wonder, Neo, Yes, he stands for everyman – every one of us who just gets on and does the job – so many of us can identify with him.
LikeLike
NEO said:
You know me pretty well. 🙂 Over the last few years, he has become my favorite saint, not a patron saint exactly, cause I don’t necessarily believe is such, but he tends to be the one that I relate to; a (not so) simple tradesman trying to do the right thing, and mostly, at least, succeeding.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
🙂 Yes, he is what our society needs to value more – an honest man who wanted nothing more than to earn a decent living and care for his wife and child. He cared nothing for fame or riches or any of the things we seem to crave.
LikeLike
NEO said:
Precisely so, the model of the man that built our world.
In addition he reminds me of a bit of Kipling:
“Though our smoke may hide the Heavens from your eyes,
It will vanish and the stars will shine again,
Because, for all our power and weight and size,
We are nothing more than children of your brain!”
Seems to me that more than most, he was one of us
LikeLiked by 1 person
chalcedon451 said:
yes – our Martha
LikeLiked by 1 person
NEO said:
Indeed, he is.
LikeLiked by 1 person
newenglandsun said:
The Syriac tradition often includes that Joseph broke off the engagement because he deemed Mary as too holy to wed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bosco the Great said:
It had to be Mary and Joe. They were in the line of David. Naughty or nice, they were it.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
I think you’ll find there were quite a few jews back then able to claim such a descent – they weren’t the only two you know.
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
You forget about Satan. he thought he killed off the line of david. He was working to keep the savior from being born. satan enterd the crowd and had them insist on killing Jesus. Satan tried up to the very end. He thought he won when they killed him.
Death, where is thy victory?
Jesus rose from the dead, and so shall his church.
Satan, seeing he was beaten, decided to take as many of the humans with him when he goes. He started false religions and other diversions, like movie stars and theme parks. His crowning invention is the largest false religion on earth. Its promises salvation that it doesn’t have to give. Instead of holding up Christ, it holds up costumes and graven images and golden cups and a cracker god in a golden cage. Satan knows he has but a short time.
LikeLike
Servus Fidelis said:
Indeed. Your time is very short Bosco. Time for you to stop denying Christ and His Church and save your soul for real.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bosco the Great said:
Let me guess. You want me to join the catholic church. Well, at least you care enough to invite me to where you believe is salvation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Servus Fidelis said:
Yes, the only Church that ever preserved the Scriptures that you think are somehow delivered and preserved magically. The Church whose Scriptoriums produced and keep the scriptures so that you would have a Bible to misinterpret today. You might go see what the Church says about these Scriptures that they kept alive for these 2000 years instead of telling everyone that there is no thing as an established Church. Do you really think that these ‘saved persons’ copied and kept these alive? I hate to break it to you – but it was the Catholic Church that you vilify and blaspheme on a daily basis.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bosco the Great said:
I think you are mixing in men who kept copies of the letters and gospels with the catholic church proper. We already had the OT.But the catholic church is not a person. Some people who considered themselves catholic gatherd the gospels, which were already gatherd together. I believe the catholic church took a 180 shortly after that. Anything that resembled Christ was tossed. In came the solstice and the yule logs and easter and xmas and Halloween and a pontifex maximus. It doesn’t resemble the first gathering of good brother Constantine.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
Bosco – one for you:
http://www.catholicworldreport.com/Item/3580/is_catholicism_the_babylon_mystery_religion.aspx#.VJnMUseOY-M.twitter
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
Ah hahaha. Mark Shea is an old friend of mine. he wrote that article. I like his history lessons. Hes good at that, but he uses artistic license when Writing about Mary.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
But he puts several torpedoes through your stuff about Babylon.
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
Now just where do you get this stuff? Why would Satan think he’d killed off the line of David? By the time Jesus was born there would have been hundreds of people able to claim descent from David, perhaps thousands.
Jesus said the Church he founded would never fail – not that it would die and rise with him. You really must get hold of a real Bible, and not use whatever odd version gives you these false idea.
For the nth time, Jesus says the bread is his body – and we bow in front of him – you call him a cracker; best of luck with that line Bosco.
LikeLike
Servus Fidelis said:
Indeed, C. I wonder if Bosco takes Phil. 2:10 seriously; ‘at the name of Jesus every knee should bend.’ It would be grand to see Bosco genuflect. 🙂
LikeLike
chalcedon451 said:
That’s probably not in the Bible according to Bosco 🙂
LikeLike
Bosco the Great said:
Well, be my guest. Bow to the cracker. But one is suppose to eat it, not bow to it. Its any bread or food. Do this in remembrance of him. No need to put it in a golden cage. Just eat it. Its a memorial. And a darned fine one. His words are the bread of life. One can do communion and still wind up in hell.
LikeLike
Servus Fidelis said:
Indeed, one can declare themselves saved and still wind up in hell as well. Best wakeup.
LikeLiked by 1 person
chalcedon451 said:
How on earth is a Monstrance a ‘cage’? We do eat the bread Bosco.
LikeLike