Tags
It would seem as though my last couple of posts have had the effect of poking Farver Phil back to life, and here’s his latest.
How old-fashioned can you be? It is obvious that if you use the words ‘God of Abraham’ you mean that all the Abrahamic faiths believe in the same God. Trinitarian Christians have this insistence about a ‘Trinity’, and if you let them, they’ll come up with all these dead white blokes from ancient history using incomprehensible language; best of luck with that, Pope Frankie isn’t going to let that get in his way, any more than I will. Apart from anything else, such language isn’t inclusive, as it fails to include Binitarian Christians or Unitarian ones.
Fortunately, good old Vat 2 put us on the right track. It recognised the obvious – that ‘God’ word is used by many, and when you come to think about it, if you believe in God, what you believe in has to be part of the One God – coz that’s the only God that there is, even if you see him in Shiva and Ganesh – they’re all part of the One God, and as I’ve said to many Pastafarians (Google it daddio), God is indeed like a bowl of pasta, in so many ways, when you come to think about it, indeed, I was watching a telly prog the other evening where you could see that those Pagan with their worshipping the Sun were really acknoledging the oneness of all.
Me, I’m at one with the new Dean at Washington National Cathedral, who has pushed me even further to where I’ve always been going, not least with this brilliant summary:
“I don’t want to be loosey-goosey about it,” he says, “but I describe myself as a non-theistic Christian.”
And he goes on to expand on the concept.
“Jesus doesn’t use the word God very much,” he says. “He talks about his Father.”
Hall explains: “Where I am now, how do I understand Jesus as a son of God that’s not magical? I’m trying to figure out Jesus as a son of God and a fully human being, if he has both fully human and a fully divine set of chromosomes. . . . He’s not some kind of superman coming down. God is present in all human beings. Jesus was an extraordinary human being. Jesus didn’t try to convert. He just had people at his table.”
That’s a cool definition of not being ‘loosey-goosey’ – couldn’t be any looser if the wing-nut had come off – that’s how I like ’em. And he sure gets into the zone when he says:
“We’re in a period where people under 50 don’t see the church as a credible place to explore their questions about God.”
I wonder why that can be given good priests like the new Dean. Still, we can, as he does, take comfiort in the fact that the culture to which his church belongs is dying and it with it – I guess that’s what happens when your church is monocultural.
Still, all the more room for me and the guys down at the interfaith cntre, where we know that from Buddha to Big Brothers, all are one in the great One and All, as the great Meanie put it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.