
Today the Church of England commemorates the memory of Richard Hooker (25 March, 1554 – 3 November 1600), whom many regard as the founder of Anglicanism. Ah, I already hear cries of ‘that was Henry VIII’. It was certainly Henry who broke with Rome but the nature of the Church of England was not decided then, or indeed across the next century and a half; it was contested.
In Henry’s reign the break with Rome was complete in terms of politics and ecclesiastical jurisdiction, but well before his death, theologically he had rowed back against some of the more extreme claims made by those who saw themselves as disciples of Luther and Calvin. These Protestants made greater strides under the young Edward VI, before being decisively checked by his half-sister Mary, who returned England to obedience to Rome. But her half-sister, Elizabeth I, steered a way between the two extremes. But that was in many ways a political strategy rather than an ecclesiastical solution.
Oddly, Hooker’s great eight volume “Of the Laws of Ecclesiatical polity”, only four volumes were published in his lifetime, and then toward the end. They were taken up by the Laudian party in the Church, who wanted to emphasise the catholic heritage and saw his arguments against the Puritans as great ammunition – which indeed they are. It was during this period that the other volumes were published, but it was not until the Restoration of Charles II that Hooker came into his own, as his work was cited by those wishing to establish a middle way between papism and puritanism.
I am not even going to pretend that I have read the eight volume, but I have read and would encourage anyone interested to read the selection edited by Raymond Chapman. Once you get used to sentences with 200 words, he makes great reading, and his style is very much the man – and the Church. He treats his opponents with respect, and dismantles extremism very skilfully. He represents the temper of English Christianity, not too much emphasis on individual reason, and not too much emphasis on docility to authority.
Hooker’s legacy, like Newman’s, was his work, and it is what has been received by posterity which has marked him out. He was a man of faith who steered his way through parlous times. His legacy is one all Anglicans should treasure. Let me finish with the Collect for today from Common Worship:
God of peace, the bond of all love,
who in your Son Jesus Christ have made the human race your inseparable dwelling place:
after the example of your servant Richard Hooker,
give grace to us your servants ever to rejoice in the true inheritance of your adopted children
and to show forth your praises now and ever;
through Jesus Christ your Son our Lord,
who is alive and reigns with you,
in the unity of the Holy Spirit,
one God, now and for ever.
I am glad you find the Chapman selections useful. I hope the others in the series will be a help too. It’s good to be reminded of Hooker, for whom I have always had a great fondness. Thank you for this.
LikeLiked by 3 people
It, and the rest of that series, was a wonderful present – thank you xx
LikeLiked by 3 people
It was a pleasure. It is even more of one to see you using it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was a typically generous gift, and I’d like to put it to use here and in my further study. The latter is going well xx
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am very pleased. I shall yet live to see you ordained I suspect.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We shall see, got to pass all my tests first. Being a Reader would be wonderful, and limit of my ambition. 😊
LikeLiked by 2 people
One of my friends was received into the Catholic faith shortly after I was. He takes a strong apologetical stance. He would do well to read from the Reformed theology a bit as even your worst enemies should be accurately represented.
LikeLike
I am a Catholic. The Church of England is a catholic church as established in these islands. Rome can claim whatever it likes (and often does) but its claim to define catholic is accepted by no one except those in its church. Go figure!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I understand that Anglicans refer to themselves as Catholic. Some of them are even more Catholic than the Pope is.
LikeLike
Sad that you resort to rather jejune sound-bites. Tomorrow’s post will endeavour to help you educate yourself about the Church of England. Have you ever read Hooker, Andrewes, Keble, Pusey, Michael Ramsey and Rowan Williams, or do you simply know better than these highly intelligent and holy men?
LikeLike
That comment was more judgmentalist toward me. I was baptized in an Anglican Mission. I have read some Rowan Williams. I have read Francis J. Hall’s Dogmatic Theology entirely. I have referenced National Apostasy on my blog before. Don’t be presumptuous.
LikeLike
I take it that you have not read any Hooker, Andrewes, Keble, Pusey or Ramsey? In which case your ability to comment on the catholicity of the Church of England seems rather limited. You will know from Lord Williams’ work that he regards the Church of England as a Catholic Church. Cheap shots are cheap, and I will call them as I see them.
LikeLike
When have I stated contrariwise? I still have a friendship with the Anglican priest who baptized me. I even stated that many Anglicans are more Catholic than the Pope. Especially the Mission I went to. Our treasurer would always mention this to his own Catholic friends how our liturgy was more traditional because of priest’s ad orientem position. I have been to an Anglican parish that was incredibly Catholic. I have not said Anglicans are incapable of Catholicity or that Anglicans should not use the term Catholic. You appear to have taken my statements concerning Anglicanism as mere cynical or sarcastic remarks. They aren’t. I assure you of my sincerity. I have nothing against Anglicanism. You are being presumptuous.
LikeLike
Your qualifications to comment on the catholicity of the Church of England appear slender. My point is one I take it you accept, which is that I am as Catholic as you.
LikeLike
I don’t know how “Catholic” you are. I affirm the teachings of Holy Mother Church so I cannot concur Anglicanism as having valid Apostolic Succession. But maybe you are in a state of grace nevertheless by virtue of your baptism and I have been partaking in the Lord’s body unworthily? Only God knows our hearts. And maybe you do hold a more orthodox understanding of the faith than most Catholics? Certainly possible.
LikeLike
Good answer. I respect the Roman Church as part of the Catholic Church, but it is just that, and its pretence that it is the only true church is sad, because it perpetuates division.
Be interested in your views on tomorrow’s post. Off to bed now – enjoy your election.
LikeLike
Branch theory is Anglican doctrine. It is not Catholic doctrine. Catholic doctrine is rooted firmly in the history of its liturgies and tradition. I don’t think its claim is divisive at all.
Maybe I’ll write a response to your comments too.
LikeLike
It am not a fan of the branch theory, that’s you being presumptuous. The Roman church does not get to define Catholicity. Read my post today.
LikeLike
Looks and sounds very interesting. Now on my list, which sadly is longer than my budget. xx
LikeLiked by 2 people
I will see if I can cite some key parts, dearest friend. xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d like that, dearest friend. xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Tomorrow’s post will have some Hooker in it. I am thinking of doing a series of posts which allow me to cite him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I, obviously, like the idea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😊👍
LikeLiked by 1 person
👍👌😊
LikeLike