Tags
Baptism, Christianity, Faith, Grace, Lutheranism, Martin Luther
If you were to ask Martin Luther, the most famous question in American Evangelicalism, “Are you born again?” He would say, “Of course I am a born-again Christian, I am baptized.” As do many of us to this day. We are Christians, we have always been (as far as we can remember). What is this tosh about born again?
What this is all about is why Lutherans (and I suspect in some ways it applies to all of the older churches), at least those who use the phrase, “One Holy and Apostolic Catholic Church” as we do. we tend to be not wholly Protestant.
That is why there is no revivalism in Lutheranism, or indeed in the Orthodox or Catholic traditions, where we teach baptismal regeneration and practice infant baptism. Let’s look at some differences, shall we?
For Luther, justification isn’t tied to any single event but happens as often as we repent and return to the power of baptism. Justification by faith alone happens in the Catholic context of the Catholic sacrament of penance. Sorry, it’s not a once in a lifetime deal. This doesn’t eliminate choice (one can always refuse to believe).
Luther’s beliefs parallel the Catholic belief in sacramental efficacy, which places salvific power in external things. Without this, we must rely on faith as well, in other words, the fact that I believe.
Luther often says, “Believe it and you have it”, in many variations. This is not because faith earns it or achieves anything, it is simply because God keeps his word.
This is certainly not because of the perception of the mind, this is purely rigorously objective truth, God does not lie. Our certainty is based upon that, not on our faith. In Why Luther Is Not Quite Protestant,¹ Phillip Cary writes.
Whoever believes and is baptized is saved” (Mark 16:16) Luther teaches that the baptismal formula, “I baptize you in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit,” is the word of Christ. Luther is emphatic on this point: the words spoken in the act of baptizing are Christ’s own, so it is Christ who really performs the baptism. Most importantly for the logic of faith, the first-person pronoun in the baptismal formula refers to Christ, so that it is Christ himself who says to me, “I baptize you….” Ministers are merely the mouthpiece for this word of Christ, just as when they say, “This is my body, given for you.”
Making that decision for Christ or a conversion experience actually detracts from, the point about faith alone. We are justified by believing what Christ says is true. In short, God does not lie.
In brief, it is all based on the truthfulness of God, and we (and Luther did as well) like Paul’s saying in Romans 3:4 “Let God be true and every man a liar.”
And that every man includes us. We can put no faith in our own words, not even in our confession of faith. That is one reason for infant baptism, it’s pretty shaky ground to baptize on the basis of a believer’s confession of faith because we never really know what we believe. Luther’s doctrine of justification by faith alone means that Christians can’t rely on faith. Faith itself doesn’t rely on itself but only Christ’s promise,
This is the well known Lutheran pro me. The emphasis is not on our experience but on what God said. It’s quite unreflective.
More to come in this series, as I get it sorted myself.
¹Pro Ecclesia 14/4 ((Fall 2005)
Wonderful article!
I do have a question, however; you write “… we never really know what we believe.” Is that a true statement? I’m sure many who read this site would say they know what they believe and they know it for all time. I may doubt what I believe in regard to everything else, but never my belief in God nor my ‘rightness’ in so believing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know, I have the same reaction, and frankly, so did Luther. But the point is in so doing we are relying on ourselves for our salvation when we should be relying on the objective fact that “God does not lie”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much rests on what the word ‘believe’ means. We might assume that because we use that word so frequently then therefore we must be using it in it fullest sense every time that we utter it. However, I think that by belief we often mean something which our discursive mind holds to be a demonstrable truth yet in the specific context of faith its meaning is more akin to a thing which our whole person has become so convinced about that we are (at least theoretically) willing to die for it. The distinction is important because to convince the whole person to believe in this fashion requires a process of conviction which necessarily includes but is not limited to Reason alone.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True, and that I think is much the point. In this unreflective view, we only have to believe that God does not lie (although I suppose we have to believe He exists), only believe that he does not lie, a n easier task than believing that we are saved.
LikeLike
A fine article. There are times where I wonder if Evangelicalism is even remotely the same religion as Christianity, but when we find bonds to work together, as God wills it, it’s such a good thing to see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kind of the same. Calvin and Hus champion a much more reflective view, where what we believe is material. Luther’s view is rather medieval and Catholic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much – now I begin to get it – you are a great guide, dearest friend xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you overpraise badly, but I always am pleased when you enjoy my blundering about., dearest friend. xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
If that is blundering, blunder away, dearest friend xx
LikeLike
I shall. xx
LikeLiked by 1 person