Yesterday’s online service from the Church of England was just marvellous! It was from the Book of Common Prayer, and the Rev. Fergus Butler-Gallie not only did it to perfection, he gave a marvellous sermon! For anyone who thought that the BCP was stuffy, or only for older people (okay, in my later 30s, but NOT old) take a look-see.
Now, I’m not one of those who go on about liturgy, as regulars will know. Brought up on versions of the ghastly Alternative Service books on the late 80s and early 90s, I welcomed “Common Worship” and I use it for Morning and Evening prayer in private devotion. But I do love a BCP Mattins on Sunday, and, when I can get it, as BCP Communion service. Watching the Rev. Fergus yesterday reminded me why I love it so much. The short answer is that I love it for the same reason I love the Church of England – it is a defining part of me and the culture I inhabit.
Brought up in Wales, I was a member of the Church of Wales, and therefroe very much not part of the establishment; nonconformists, as my father called them, were the norm. It was only when I went to university in England and to chapel at College that I began to realise how important the BCP was to me. We’d used it in my local church and it seeped into my consciousness. To this day, in private devotions, I slip into the BCP general confession. I have indeed ‘erred and strayed from Thy ways like lost sheep’, and ‘followed the devices and desires of my own heart,’ so the words are not worn smooth with use, they mean what they have always meant for me.
Being brought up Anglican in Wales was in some sense to define myself as part of something bigger than my homeland, much as I loved it. Being half-Welsh and half-German, the Church gave me a cultural home which I cherished and still do. I am part of a world-wide Communion, but I am also linked, historically, to a Church which somehow has managed to reconcile so many differing opinions into one place. I suspect the loss of the regular use of the BCP was not helpful to the Church, but as usual, it managed to keep it and I see signs that it is used more often. One of our churches here uses it regularly for Mattins, and I do tend to slope off in its direction whenever possible.
It provides a living link with the past. It isn’t that I can’t appreciate a Latin Mass (I used to attend one from time to time when I was at College), but it is not mine. I feel no historic link with it, whereas I do with the BCP. Cranmer’s language is so beautiful. I feel instinctively that is how you talk to God, you don’t address him like he’s the postman. I am sure God doesn’t mind, it’s one of those weird things I mind on his behalf.
As I repeat the well-used phrases of the BCP, I feel myself in timeless communion with generations of Anglicans past, present and future. It evokes for me a sense of belonging and yes, comfort. Maybe there are bold and brave souls who do not need comfort in their religion, but I am neither of those things. Heavy laden, I go unto him and lay my yoke on his shoulders and find rest. He told me to, I do as I am told, and lo and behold, his promise is fulfilled.
Yes, I know history is complex and I am more than familiar with the arguments about the Reformation and the Church, and with the arguments that Rome has formally never accepted Anglican orders. But I am not quite sure it matters what Rome has said when its practice shows what its Popes really think. There’s a part of me that does not care at all, as my view of Rome is rather that of Anglo-Catholics and Orthodox, which is that historically it deserves respect, but its claim to universal jurisdiction are just that, its claims. It isn’t, after all, as though anyone watching the Catholic culture wars. can be under any illusion that it is a unified communion. But in that, it is like my own church. But it is not my church, though I wish it nothing but good.
I cross the threshold of my Anglican church with that feeling of being where I am meant to be, being home. So thank you Rev. Fergus and all those who produced the lovely service yesterday – I adored it!
Quite. I, as a Lutheran, love the BCP even as (and for the same reason) as I love the KJV. It is, indeed, how one should address God. The language is antique, and it was when it was written, so it has the feel of being there, everywhere, forever. I have no problems at all with Lutheran liturgy, which of course is also traditional, in fact, as I’m reading sort of medieval still. BCP is like that as well. My copy from shortly after our civil war is well worn, and getting more so. Here like the Bible, is one of the sources of our language, and one of the best expressions of our love of God. Now, if my aging eyes could read it without glasses. It’s only rival with me is The Lutheran Service Book, which I also like, but Cranmer’s English is so much better.
Americans are all sorts of Christians (and not Christians as well). Yet when we say goodbye to our leaders, or collectively need a port in a storm, we too turn to Anglicanism. Why? Well it was the historic faith of many of our people, and like the Church of England, it either offends no one or offends us all equally
It is not our state church, such a thing cannot be, but there has to be one church where we can gather, for Presidential funerals, in time of catastrophe, and in time of joy. And there is, it is the National Cathedral, and it is an Episcopal church. The only time it is different is when we have cause to be in a Catholic church
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes. And if you want to tour the National Cathedral, I think it costs like $15. And my wife, who was raised Lutheran and really wanted to tour it, saw the charge and said, “I’m not going to pay to go inside a church.”
And so, we didn’t go.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I suspect, like in the UK, you can avoid that by going to a service. Then again, $15 doesn’t strike me as overly exorbitant considering what the National Cathedral is. The Episcopalians have to make money where they can, after all, their membership is deserting to the continuing Anglican churches just as fast as Lutherans are the ELCA.
Get woke, Go broke.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thank you, dearest friend xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very welcome, dearest friend. xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
As you see, I broke the writer’s block! xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed you did, and very effectively. Yay for us all! 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
I miss the Anglo-Catholic Fridat morning eucharist I attended at my college chapel. I was foolish to abandon it, but such are the growing pains and the tensions between evangelicalism/puritanism/dissinterism and the chapel culture. Alas….
LikeLiked by 2 people
I have come to find it easier than it used to be to worship as God sends – but I am fortunate to have a number of churches close x
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, Jess! You’ve struck a deep chord in my heart. I am in love with our 1928 Book of Common Prayer. Have been, all my life.
“Hear these comforting words …” And they are comforting.
Please explain for me; the Church of England uses the 1662 BCP, is that correct? If it is correct, I’m going to buy one on Amazon. I have a very dear friend, whom I’ve never met!, who, like you, was born and raised in Wales and now lives in Wells, England. Bless her dear heart, she wants to be baptised (has never been) and I have been helping her, the best I can from 4000 miles away. She ordered the 1662 from Amazon UK and I had her look for the catechism – not really knowing if it was even in the 1662 (I am not as fluent in English church history as I probably should be). But there it was and I suggested she read it and think about all that it instructs. Also explained the Apostles’ Creed as being our baptismal Creed and that she should read the whole of the baptismal sacrament.
She has found a church she’d like to be baptized in – Taunton, I think – as soon as you all can go back to church. I’ve told her to contact the priest and explain her plan and let him guide her toward baptism.
My 1928 BCP is a dear friend – although it looks like it’s gone nine miles of rough road. It’s beaten up, notated, has little prayers friends have given me, taped to some of the pages. The prayers for all different needs and occasions is so helpful And you’re exactly right! I like having a lovelier language to address God than the one I use to order my groceries.
Special big hug for this lovely article.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I am glad it struck a chord. Yes, it is the 1662 that we use, not that it is vastly different from the previous one. The 1928 revision was not approved by Parliament here and so we tend not to use it. The Prayer Book Society is a really good resource for more info and if I was more savvy I’d put up a link, but just Google it. Your friend should contact the priest now, I an sure he’d help. I am glad it isn’t just me, not wanting to talk to God in a common way! xx
LikeLiked by 2 people