We are advised to practice something called “social distancing.” As some wag said to me the other day, that shouldn’t be hard for a practising Catholic and a self-identified conservative in Higher Education! But, joking apart, we need to reflect on what this really means. We are social animals, and outside of social groupings we run risks, especially those of us who suffer from anxiety which can lead to mental health problems. Donne was right, no one is an island, however much we may imagine we are.
The word “ecclesia,” from which we derive the word “Church,” was originally an assembly of Athenian citizens debating. A Church is a gathering of the faithful (and the rest of us too). Thus, for the Churches to close at this juncture is a double blow. We are deprived, most obviously of the spiritual nourishment of the Holy Eucharist. There’s a case that in the modern Church we have come to take frequent Communion for granted in a way our ancestors would have found surprising; but there is no case for an indefinite Eucharistic fast. Many, like me will, I suspect, be offering it up as part of our Lenten penance. Is it hard? Yes, and therefore all the more efficacious, I suspect.
But there is a second blow to us; the cessation of the Church community. However much some may protest about noise before the Service starts, and people leaving early, and all the other things which annoy them, for most, the interaction with our felow Church-goers is an important part of our Church life; its sudden ending leaves a void.
To some extent, we can engage, electronically, in on-line Services, but they are not the same; they are, however, better than nothing.
What some Churches, including my own, have done, is to keep in touch by telephone with parishioners, with an offer, where necessary, of practical help. Such gestures, small in themselves, mean a lot to people who now find themselves alone. On line Services have their place, but they cannot replace the “ecclesia.”
But, even as the business of the outside world grinds almost to a halt, there is an opportunity, if we seize it. In the middle of a world disfigured by sin and suffering, the Christian is heir to the blessing of the joy of Christ and the Good News He brings. Our prayers express that joy, and prayer binds us together as a Christian community. This is an opportunity to deepen our prayer life. I have always found praying the Rosary helpful, but now, more then ever, reflecting on its mysteries unites me to the millions of others doing the same. The Psalmist tells us to pray in the evening, the morning and at noon – it is advice which many of us neglect; now might be a good time to get into the habit of so doing.
Wherever we find ourselves, God is there. Prayer is not a matter of shouting out to someone who is socially-distancing Himself from us, it is an intimate conversation through Jesus who taught us to pray the “Our Father.” Our Father is there with us and for us, and if we have felt a distance, then that comes from us, not from Him. St Gregory of Nyssa tells us that prayer takes us directly to Heaven and puts us in God’s presence. When we pray for the forgiveness of our sins, we are taught to pray as we forgive those who have sinned against us. Do we do that? We ask God to do for us as we have done. This is a moment to remind ourselves of that. Prayer, in short, heals our relations with others, if we will allow it, and if we have the humility so to do.
None of us wanted to be given the opportunity to draw closer to God in the way it has been presented to us, but we have been given it. As Pope Francis said last week, there is a judgement involved in all of this; what is it that we value most?
Indeed, I came out of a church that did communion (I hesitate to use the phrase ‘The Eucharist’ for a representational communion, still those five times, Christmas, Easter, Pentecost, World Communion Sunday (I think), and Reformation Sunday, were important. One needed a reason to skip those days, as opposed to most Sundays when one needed a pro forma excuse, in case anyone asked.
I said yesterday, that I expected the US to revert mostly to normality by Easter, well then I read the President is saying 30 April. I think enforcement will be gone soon, in any case. Americans are showing our typical restiveness as the hand of government gets too heavy, and no sensible person thinks closing the country is an appropriate response to a flu outbreak.
Britons are, perhaps, more docile but there too I find an undercurrent of resistance, which will grow.
Meantime, wash your hands, keep your asocial distance, no point making things worse, but that is no reason not to engage with the community. And keep praying.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh, here there has been a very firm response to police heavy handedness. Those clothed in a little authority often misuse it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Always true, and if not checked will always get worse. So a firm response is good. Seems in general to be a problem in government the last few decades.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Governments like to feel they are important- it’s a substitute for being competent
LikeLiked by 2 people
One of the wisest comments I’ve heard in a while.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good thing that we didn’t go into isolation for the Spanish Flu which took both Jacinto and Francisco Marta or we would never have had the Miracle of the Sun or the secrets as given to us by the BVM through Lucia. If had been in isolation nobody would have shown up for the miracle of the sun of for any of the apparitions. The loss of that is greater than the loss of life . . . which I’m sure took its toll on many of the looker’s on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Remember, we had the Miracle of the Sun before the two youngsters died. This was before the Spanish flu. Gathering together where there is a risk of onfecting others is not a good model of discipleship.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It was at the beginning of the Spanish Flu, John. It had already been ravaging the US and got carried to Europe in 2017 by the troops. The next year it got so bad in Spain that they named it the Spanish Flu themselves . . . but this was the second round which took the seers and laid waste to the German troops. At least that is what I was led to believe. You’re the historian and the history I watched on the Smithsonian may be full of bunk.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fear it was Dave. Fatima was May to October 1917, the Spanish flu began in January 1918. My own grandfather was one of its millions of casualties.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So was mine. But he lived through it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“In 2018, Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biology professor at the University of Arizona who is examining the history of the 1918 pandemic, revealed that he obtained tissue slides created by William Rolland, a physician who reported on a respiratory illness likely to be the virus while a pathologist in the British military during World War One.[142] Rolland had authored an article in the Lancet during 1917 about a respiratory illness outbreak beginning in 1916 in Étaples, France.[143][144] Worobey traced recent references to that article to family members who had retained slides that Rolland had prepared during that time. Worobey extracted tissue from the slides to potentially reveal more about the origin of the pathogen.”
Last paragraph in the article on Wikipedia on the Spanish Flu. It does appear that it was in France by 1916 but I’m not sure at this date that any of the information can be definitive. Earlier it was spoken of as having started in 1914 as a milder flu. It was worse in 1918 for sure but then the present virus began many months before we were made aware of it also. So perhaps the Smithsonian documentary was relying on the research as given in the last paragraph of the Wikipedia article (above).
LikeLike