Tags
Indeed, Live Action reports
The state already had among the most liberal abortion laws in the nation. The new Illinois RHA does away with things the state’s ban on partial-birth abortion, parental notification of minors, ends the need for licensing abortion facilities by the state, allows non-physicians to commit abortions, and allows for abortion at any time, for any reason, including for reasons of “health” which may include “physical, emotional, psychological, familial” or any other type of “health” the abortionist will accept. And abortionists have made clear that they believe the very state of being pregnant and not wanting to be is reason enough to commit an abortion.
Today on NEO, I’m talking about Pelegianism in the modern world. Here’s a prime example.
But Gene Veith at Cranach noted one ray of hope.
The Bishop of Springfield, Illinois, Thomas Paprocki, has issued a decree barring the leadership of the state legislator and Catholic lawmakers who voted for one of the most radically pro-abortion laws in the country from receiving Holy Communion.
He did so with some excellent language describing just how great a sin that abortion is.
From the Catholic News Agency (my [Gene’s] bolds):
“In accord with canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law…Illinois Senate President John Cullerton and Speaker of the House Michael J. Madigan, who facilitated the passage of the Act Concerning Abortion of 2017 (House Bill 40) as well as the Reproductive Health Act of 2019 (Senate Bill 25), are not to be admitted to Holy Communion in the Diocese of Springfield in Illinois because they have obstinately persisted in promoting the abominable crime and very grave sin of abortion as evidenced by the influence they exerted in their leadership roles and their repeated votes and obdurate public support for abortion rights over an extended period of time,” Bishop Thomas Paprocki wrote in a June 2 decree.
“These persons may be readmitted to Holy Communion only after they have truly repented these grave sins and furthermore have made suitable reparation for damages and scandal, or at least have seriously promised to do so, as determined in my judgment or in the judgment of their diocesan bishop in consultation with me or my successor,” the bishop added. . . .
“I declare that Catholic legislators of the Illinois General Assembly who have cooperated in evil and committed grave sin by voting for any legislation that promotes abortion are not to present themselves to receive Holy Communion without first being reconciled to Christ and the Church in accord with canon 916 of the Code of Canon Law,” Paprocki wrote.
In a statement issued June 6, the bishop said that “in issuing this decree, I anticipate that some will point out the Church’s own failings with regard to the abuse of children.”
“The same justifiable anger we feel toward the abuse of innocent children, however, should prompt an outcry of resistance against legalizing the murder of innocent children. The failings of the Church do not change the objective reality that the murder of a defenseless baby is an utterly evil act.
So there you go, a couple of Lutherans commending a Catholic bishop.
Sadly, it’s not an extreme sanction, like excommunication which separates one (presumably permanently) from the Church, and it only applies in the Diocese of Springfield. But it is way past time for our clergy to begin to correct the course of these murderous miscreants. That applies to all clergy, for I think not correcting your congregants on such an issue, makes one a participant. I’m not smart enough to know if God agrees with that, but I think He may not be overly happy with his ministers who do not protect children.
Anyone having an abortion of their own free will or those who are materially cooperating in an abortion is automatically excommunicated from the Catholic Church and until recently could only be pardoned by the Pope. Today a priest can do this. In my honest opinion these “catholic” legislators who materially cooperate in countless abortions are excommunicated though our bishops (in large numbers) never say it. Not being a theologian nor a canon lawyer makes my understanding suspect though and perhaps not nuanced enough for these ‘experts’ in Church Law. But as a layman, I don’t see how such cooperation would merit these individuals to claim that they are Catholics ‘in good standing’ nor can I see that they can call themselves Catholic even if simply separated by grave sin until their confession and penance until they attempt to right the wrongs which they have permitted. I’d love to have one of the ‘experts’ in moral theology and canon law add to my lay understanding of the severity of their crime against the natural and the Divine Law and address as well the proper “just and merciful” correction should be.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’ll go further. I simply do not see how they can claim to be Christians. From the very beginning our mark was the care of infants and the helpless.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What is about “Thou Shalt Not Kill (murder)” do they not understand? It really isn’t an ambiguous point to Catholics, other Christians or Jews who accept the Decalogue given to Moses.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No the only ambiguity is whether kill means kill as we use it now or whether it means murder Murder is the correct answer, but the wrong answer is even more stringent.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Bishop Paprocki, anyone in his diocese is lucky folk.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Indeed they are.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Slaughter of the innocents indeed – Illinois is emulating Herod.
LikeLiked by 1 person