Many, therefore, of His disciples, when they had heard this, said, “This is a hard saying; who can hear it?”
-John 6:60
I was chatting with a friend at church yesterday about a variety of topics, one of which was the question of why there seem to be so few miracles today, at least in the West, in comparison with the picture in Acts. We did not come to a firm answer, but we considered some of the reasons that have been advanced over the years:
- Lack of faith;
- That was for the Apostolic Age;
- Holiness; and
- We are to walk by faith and not by sight.
Now the point of this post is not to discuss the vexed problem of miracles (but feel free to do so in the comments below), but to consider whether our social conventions (and personal baggage) make us shy away from certain topics. In our conversation, and later when I was reflecting upon it, I thought about how some suggested answers to the question would make people feel condemned: “X is not happening because we are doing something wrong.”
Sometimes we need to endure stiff criticism in order to grow. In the Bible, the metaphor of pruning is used, along with the idea of a father’s discipline, as a way of conveying the idea that growth can be painful, even though the end product is beautiful. It is natural to fear the pain: Jesus asked in the Garden of Gethsemane if there were some way to avoid the Cross. Once the way forward is clear, however, we must walk it – however long it takes.
The way is not always clear though – sometimes we need to allow space just to listen, to reflect, so that we can receive revelation on the way forward. This involves humility, acknowledging that we do not have the answer – and a willingness to accept the possibility of discomfort.
Some of the problems we see in the Church today seem to spring from an unwillingness to endure discomfort in our theology as well as in our physical lives. A good example of this is the trend to be overly positive in our theology of the body because of a desire not to be seen as a gnostic. The problem with this is that Paul very explicitly denigrates the flesh in a way that is not merely a synecdoche for evils committed in the body. His point is that these bodies are subject to decay, and decay is an inferior state compared with the gloriousness of a spiritual body such as the angels possess. It is not gnostic to affirm these things: Gnosticism involves claiming that the path to salvation lies in the possession of secret knowledge, and so on. See David Bentley Hart’s critique of NT Wright’s doctrine of the resurrection:
So, hard sayings are part of Scripture, and part of Christian growth. We all need to hear them from time to time.
It sounds like a very similar conversation to that my wife and I had yesterday; why do we not see as many remarkable saints that draw large crowds by their holiness. I say that because, at least in the Catholic Church, most of the miracles that we have seen these past 2000 years seemed to be concentrated largely around holy men and holy women.
Since the deaths of Padre Pio (1968), Solanus Casey (1957), Mother Teresa (1997), Brother Andre (1937), or the seers of Fatima, the 20th century seemed to almost run dry of spiritual giants who seemed to have a direct connection to God.
Like you I wonder if our leaving behind the totality of their universe (which was supernatural) and replaced by scientism and its like has not yielded a society than no longer nourishes such souls to become saints and likewise has turned people into religious skeptics unable to accept any miracles or saints.
I also wonder if our education in religion has failed us as did our new forms of worship. For it seems to have stripped us of our zeal for religion; with few who live only for God and seemingly live in a supernatural reality rather than this worldly reality that is so pragmatic and lifeless in its rejection of the true reasons for our lives and replaced them with other more worldly goals.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Regardless of your thoughts on John Paul II, by your point here alone, people were drawn to him. Even if you think he was intellectual wrong, he could still, and did in my opinion, possess holiness.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Its the ‘quality’ of the sainthood that I am addressing more specifically however. JPII drew large crowds largely because he was the first globe trotting Pope and possessed an air of holiness no doubt. But the examples I gave were of those last great saints where miracles seemed to be almost daily occurrences or that the miracle wrought such as Fatima still affects us to this day. And lets face it, JPII was directly connected to the coattails of Fatima; the errors of Russia, the shooting etc. He was almost a footnote to the miracle; which, in my opinion, has not fully played out in our times.
The other point you make is valid as well, that miracles are miracles because they are rather uncommon or rare. But when we can surmise that there are alive today probably more Christians (at least in name only) than probably ever lived before us (all added together) one might expect more in our own day. Unless of course faith is dying and our zeal is growing cold.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I would surmise that in the West, If someone witnessed a miracle, there’s a good chance they wouldn’t recognize it—including myself. Out of the enlightenment our brains have been programmed to be Uber skeptical through our education system and culture. In the prayer class they were going over the Examen exercise of St. Ignatius, where one recounts all their experiences with God through out the day. I think it would be wise for every Western Christian to attempt this exercise.
In the global south, I would imagine that many miracles would go on reported and if they did happened the Western media would merely right it off as superstitious culture—See Kasper’s comments on the African Bishops.
LikeLiked by 3 people
*go unreported*
LikeLiked by 1 person
Very true. And this leaves us feeling as though we have nobody to rally to in our own spiritual battles. Since VII spiritual directors have become rare and those who proclaim to be such are more psychiatrists and unattached directors than they are practitioners themselves. Something has definitely changed; things have gotten worse and we seek for that which seems to be about as rare as unicorns.
We could definitely use a Padre Pio in our midst but sadly I know of none to read about or visit in our day. And without them, spirituality seems dark and phantasmic or without a vibrant life.
In its place are scandals and scandalous men and women who heap upon us new teachings for our ticklish ears. They gain crowds for their popularity but not for their holiness per se; although the crowds find anyone who preaches God’s mercy to the point of an absence of any souls in hell is simply a ‘wish’ that we would all love to embrace; not reality.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I found interesting the language used in St. Therese’s autobiography that whole growing up at times she very ill. In it she made comments how the Devil knew that her family was going to be pivotal in God’s plan and made her and others in her family ill.
Now, my “enlightened” mind says nonsense, you contracted bacteria or a virus and your 19th century peasant mind couldn’t comprehend it. On the other hand, one part of my asks, “is this something we’ve lost?”
LikeLiked by 3 people
Indeed. The simplicity of faith has left us. I don’t think it is by accident that the most miraculous saints and seers were either children or those who were considered almost simpletons by their peers. They weren’t theologians nor famous for any reasons other than their answered prayers, successful ministries or prophetic visions that they had.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’m in this prayer class and we’re discussing our most prayerful experience and so far two of the responses spoke of theirs in the Homily… what?
So, Philip here, starts talking about the Latin Mass, the Chant, The incense, the kneeling before the sacred body.
People don’t know transcendence anymore. They don’t know the sacred anymore. How can one attempt holiness without knowing?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Indeed they don’t. They don’t know how to be silent or to be still; much less to create space and quiet in their soul so that God might actually converse with them. We have filled our lives with electronic distractions and every other kind of contrivance to avoid being alone: and yet we are. We know we are and that is why we are so miserable . . . we do not feel the presence of God.
LikeLiked by 2 people
If folks can’t recognize the point in the Mass where heaven and earth meet, how can any of us expect to recognize it in our everyday lives?
LikeLiked by 3 people
The only reality they know must be palpable experiences of the senses . . . they know nothing of a dark night of the senses or a dark night of the soul although God is making our emptiness without Him quite plain. So plain, in fact, that nobody can see it; the forest for the trees comes to mind.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Also, this week, they’re having us read SC but only in parts and chapter 6 on Sacred Music has been axed out…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Naturally. Nothing that speaks of sacred music or Latin is allowed. They do not want to people to think that they are cafeteria priests and prelates when it comes to VII; although that is exactly what they are.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yeah, the Latin part of course gone too.
LikeLiked by 3 people
It wasn’t even a guess on my part. It has become so obvious that I don’t even need to do that anymore.
LikeLiked by 3 people
What do you think of the idea popular among Pentecostals and Charismatics that there is a “Spirit of Jezebel”? If such a thing exists, or at any rate describes a kind of strategy the dark powers use, then it is possible to see the same kind of thing at work today as in the days of Elijah. Look how the people who want the CC to return to traditional stances in Mass and morals are being suppressed. Is there a statue of Baal? Are their prophets and priests of Baal? Maybe in the shadows…was there any truth to Fr Gabriel Amorth’s claim that there were satanic Masses in the Vatican? I don’t like going off the deep end into conspiracy theories – but the dark spiritual powers can conspire easily – it is human conspiracies that are hard to keep secret and carry out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well I certainly dismiss any “spirit of Jezebel” theory for the simple reason that the Church has never had need of such a spirit to explain the evil of men. Evil itself is a mystery to all of us; we call it the mystery of iniquity. “For the mystery of iniquity already worketh; only that he who now holdeth, do hold, until he be taken out of the way.” –2Thessalonians 2:7
I need nothing more than the obvious seductive power of the serpent in the Garden and the evil workings of the fallen Angel of Light (Lucifer) and his minions (1/3 of the angels} who were thrown out of Heaven. All I need to remember is; “Be sober and watch: because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, goeth about seeking whom he may devour.” __ 1 Peter 5:8
LikeLiked by 1 person
Furthermore, I agree with Augustine and his rejection of the duality of Manichaeism. As he realized that evil has no form as it is a privation of the good. If God is omnibenevolent, He can not be responsible for the form of evil; furthermore, cosmologically He must be responsible for all creations, as well as no other “gods” can possess any greater attribute or characteristics than God or He could not be God.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes and the demons all had free will.
Did you read about the mysterious changes that seem to be hiding right on the Vatican Website concerning homosexuals? If not, you need to read this: http://wdtprs.com/blog/2018/08/the-mysterious-case-of-ccc-2358-on-objectively-disordered-homosexual-inclinations/
BTW: I am changing my website to do more what Canon212 is doing except hopefully choosing different articles. I’m hoping to extend this but need more readers to either enter them in or send the articles to me. Interested?
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you’re looking for canon expertise, I’m fairly a novice, I’m more suited for Patristic writings and Catechism reference, albeit why anymore…
I haven’t seen the above article but I’ll take a look after dinner and let you know.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh my…I tried it…this will be formal schism…
LikeLike
It appears it the old text from 1992 Edition of the Catechism; however, as Fr. Z points out why keep that on the servers?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Looks like somebody is getting ready for the next announcement from Bergoglio to me.
I didn’t understand at first your comment concerning Canon law but now it hit me. I was speaking of the website: canon212.com which is a traditionalist news aggregation site. It is sort of like Drudge for Catholics. I want to do something similar on the Home Page but want to find things that are not linking to, if possible. So if you are interested I could use some of your time and I’ll ask my friend Steve to see if he will send me links to articles as well.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m pretty good at finding articles. So, I can do that for sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why do folks always assume there were more miracles in the Gospels the entire 7 billion people who live on the planet today?
From the Gospel of Luke Chapter 4:
25* Indeed, I tell you, there were many widows in Israel in the days of Elijah when the sky was closed for three and a half years and a severe famine spread over the entire land.o26* It was to none of these that Elijah was sent, but only to a widow in Zarephathp in the land of Sidon.27Again, there were many lepers in Israel during the time of Elisha the prophet; yet not one of them was cleansed, but only Naaman the Syrian.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Some very interesting comments, and much that I agree with or consider worthy of further investigation. We must be willing to have these conversations and we must be willing to take risks. Look at the woman with the uncontrollable bleeding: touching Jesus’ hem was scandalous for a woman like her to do – but she did it anyway. Where is this boldness today?
LikeLiked by 1 person
In a way you find it in the common man (those with courage and faith). In my Church it is found in those who do the unthinkable; they rebuke the Pope or a bishop or priest for their actions or for their words. Now as to those who with faith go for a healing and do what the world condemns as stupid wishful thinking; it is still to be found in places like Lourdes. For they still believe that God sent Mary to us as a gift and that He blesses those who believe or have need of His help. Others simply receive the gift of acceptance of the trials that they are undergoing in this life. But they are miracles all the same.
LikeLiked by 1 person
test
LikeLike
Who ever is in charge,find out why my comment didn’t show up. Thanks in advance.
LikeLike