I am part of a quasi-bible study group on Facebook; someone in the group asked if the world is getting better or worse. The answer to this question can say a lot about one’s psychology, eschatology, and understanding of history. A question that is not always asked in this kind of musing is, “Relative to when / what ?”
Although technology has made the lives of people easier in the West, and we do not see the same prevalence of war in Europe as existed for much of its history, my intuition is that life in the world is not getting better. Why do I say this?
Firstly, abortion continues apace and is commonly accepted. Whatever flaws our ancestors had, and I concede that many of them frequented back-street abortionists, they did not openly condone abortion. To advocate the traditional Christian stance on abortion would be considered stating the obvious, espousing the popular consensus. Now, to raise the view that there is a human life inside the mother, with rights of his or her own, which take priority over her rights in many respects, is to argue for a minority position, a position that attracts great opprobrium in many circles. A society that holds life less sacred than its ancestors did has not progressed – it has decayed in that respect.
Secondly, general family patterns have changed relative to certain periods in history. The economic down-turn and decline of manufacturing jobs in the West has made it harder for large swathes of the younger generation to move out and start up families of their own. Although there is something of a putative turn-around at the moment in the US, it is not clear whether that pattern will spread to other Western countries and hold there. 10 years on from the 2008 crisis, many people are still conscious about our economic recovery.
Aside from that issue, we have aging populations and many families are having fewer children than the standard pattern of our ancestors. Several factors contribute to this problem. Culturally, the declining influence of traditional Catholicism and the rise of various technologies have allowed people to use contraceptives and abortifacients. Economically, many families are frightened to have more than one or two children because they are worried about the cost of raising them. With both parents working now, society has moved away from a model where the mother stays at home to raise the children and the boys accompany their fathers to work when they are old enough. High rents and mortgages, owing to the financial and housing crises, lead many couples to feel unable to let one of them stay at home, while some voices in the feminist movement tell women that adopting a traditional matronly role is tantamount to slavery.
These pictures are all, of course, simplifications, but they seem to resonate with what many people feel about the West’s emotional, spiritual, and economic malaise. For many people, all I have done here is to state the obvious – but there is fear to do so openly. This last point is important – the extent to which liberty has declined in the West. Certainly in the UK, it is becoming increasingly difficult to say anything that the Centre or the Left will brand as “right wing”.
I invite you to add your own thoughts in the comments below. Personally, I am well aware that my own psychological tendencies towards Western-centrism, depression, and introversion will create a biased perception of the state of the world. I am also aware that I have not dwelt on what is good in this post – and there are a lot of good things. But I think it is valid to ask whether we might be better off trading some of our current “luxuries” for a more stable, disciplined world closer to the pattern of our ancestors.
There are obvious ‘goods’ associated with medicine, food production and a general easing of economic hardships around the world. But is this truly a good?
Western thinking has tried and utterly failed to convert all of the world to our ways which has disrupted, politically torn apart, coherent civilizations around the world as has our wars which did not specifically have anything to do with isolated groups of people. So is their ‘modernization’ a good or did it tear up the fabric of their societies.
Hardships and poverty are not always an evil and replacing religious beliefs for more scientific beliefs is not always good for the cohesiveness of an individual, tribe or nation. Such things tend to require the working together of men and women in the family structure and on the level of communities of those who live in this world. They accept their hardships and try to overcome their burdens by socially working together and are supported by their large families and tribes. People tended to stay together in large extended families where now if they have children at all they tend to move all over the world looking for a better life.
So the negatives, in my mind, far exceed the positives. We are neurotic as a whole, and full of anxieties even though our poor generally live better than kings a few hundred years ago. There is great anxiety and depression as entire populations are left not knowing what they are expected to do with their life and the reason for their existence. All of our modern societies have created a non-social, social order that is nothing more than a virtual fantasy that restricts their social needs to having likes on the internet. But actual interactions between family and friends and other individuals scarcely exists which I think creates human beings who are now almost completely isolated; each man IS an island in this new paradigm.
And if that were not bad enough, we have government that tells us what is socially OK and not OK and rewards and punishes whatever it deems acceptable or unacceptable: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018/05/10/six-years-in-jail-proposed-for-online-hatred-of-religion-or-gender/
So we have become subservient to the elite class and isolated from our peers, afraid to speak our minds and terrified of our uncertain futures. We have no place to turn for social support and thereby we medicate ourselves or withdraw into psychological hells of our own making. We have, in affect, torn apart the human from the animal, the divine from the profane and chosen a forced indifference where we are too frightened to be ourselves. We will likely die alone without relatives and friends and it looks more like hospitals will decide when and by what means we will end our lives. I doubt that many of us will have a say in this in the future.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I see it in the Augustinian model, the City of Man has always been the City of Man. We’re citizens of the City of God. Different theologies confused the matter with the Two Kingdom theology or the Catholic version the Two Swords which attempt to politicize the faith in my opinion for earthly reasons. However, our faith is not of this world; the world has been as it has always been after Adam and Eve—fallen. Our stay here is a pilgrimage for our ultimate destination. We’re in the world but not of it.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Indeed, but the question Nicholas is asking is has our ability to recognize the City of God increased or decreased? Is the world better or worse today than it was in the past?
I think the City of God has been infiltrated by those who would like to tear down those walls between the World and the City of God and they have managed to do this on a macro scale, via governments, wars and laws and in a micro scale via societal norms, abortion, gender confusion etc. which leads to a destruction of the basic formation stones of the City of God; e.g. the family unit.
I doubt in that sense that we have had a ‘misery index’ based on the ideals of Christianity that has been worse since the last gasps of Rome and the feeding of Christians to the lions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And for me, misery is the important word. Material prosperity can make certain kinds of sin less common, but it can’t pull the concupiscence from our hearts. In the past, public space was, to some extent, a place where we confessed the morals we should have, even if we did not always live up to them. Now that space seems gone. I will never forget a story I read in a book about defending the doctrine of hell: people were laughing at a drunkard when a priest/vicar/minister started walking down the street. They all shut up for shame: I doubt the appearance of a priest would have the same effect now.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Probably not. The barriers between our faith and the world seem to breeched. We have a hard time noticing where one begins and ends and the other begins. The new religion is political correctness – and that the churches should reflect the religion of the world. For us Catholics, we opened the door to the world at Vatican II and it has been deteriorating ever since.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I quite agree. Nor do I see a way of fixing the damage that has been done. I don’t have blind faith in the market (not that it is available with the government standing in the way in some cases) to fix things like this because culture is a different dimension. You can create conditions to foster a certain kind of growth but there will always be the nihilistic chaos monsters, as represented by Heath Ledger’s portrayal of the Joker. And ultimately, that is what we are fighting – chaos, Leviathan, the Dragon, the roaring sea.
LikeLiked by 1 person
As an aside but I think important is the idea put forth in Mediator Dei by Pope Pius XII and in the Vatican II document The Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy. It has to do with ‘active’ participation. However both the above documents uses the Latin word actuosus and not activa which is simple actions. Actuosus has to do with zeal and subjective impulse such as prayerfulness or contemplative. Sounds minor but the reformers have interpreted actuosus as activa and it has made us busy in the world and in our liturgy and robbed us of our prayerful, contemplative center.
I blame the fall in other Christian Churches with this Vatican II surrender to the world for if they had seen us stand against the world perhaps they would not have given in so easy. We are here for spiritual combat and not to make the world our playground and friend. The world will always hate us because it hates Christ. So all this busyness that we see today is simply activism without being spiritually centered.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, and some of it is not necessarily that productive. I think we have lost our way in some respect: there is a lack of focus on the Gospel in some places and too much in the way of pabulum when it comes to teaching the Word. If we don’t stretch congregations with the supernatural context of the bible we risk ignoring a significant part of its message. Although I note the dangers in the Pentecostal and Charismatic movements, at least a number of them could hear God speaking to our political situation right now. A lot of the mainline bishops and leaders were deaf: if I’d listened to them instead of the voice within, I would have voted remain.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed pablum is pretty normal fare these days. I guess we are not ready for meat according to those who are running things and designing liturgies; or more likely, they are keeping us from developing spiritually for other nefarious reasons like being relevant in political activism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed. Unfortunately, if you’re tied into a particular set-up then you have to explore these things online and find like-minded people there. It saddens me that Philip met such opposition in his church group.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But it is a great life lesson for everyone. These are the pew sitters who call themselves by the same name as we do and yet our beliefs and thinking are as different as night and day.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m sympathetic to Philip’s comment that we are not of this world. But we are in it. And one of our missions is to share “The Good News” In Two Kingdoms Luther builds on Augustine’s two cities, and thus Evangelism is one of our vocations, but so is being a citizen of the Kingdom of the left hand, which one day will also report to the King. It is not for us to stand aside and let the world go as it will. It is for us to help our neighbors and to help to ensure justice for them.
Is the world getting better or worse? Well yeah, compared to what? Most peo[le in the world get enough to eat, have a place to sleep, in our countries, poor people may only have one smart phone, and two flat screen TVs. 99.99+% of our ancestors would look at them aghast at their wingeing. Is it as good as it could be? No, of course not, Original Sin happened, and it still echoes, as it always will. Rather like the Light Brigade, it is not so much for us to wonder why, or shirk our duty, it is for us to do (our best) and die, as Christ calls us to do.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think my angle on the matter is more to do with being sober. I have a dislike for the dominionist and prosperity gospel line that the Church will take over the world because it ignores persecution and suffering. This is why I dislike post-millennialism and a-milliennialism: I believe those views set people up for a fall. My optimism is based on Parousia, not on humans muddling through to the finish line.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree thought there is much to be said about the recent dimming of the light on the hill which seems to be causing confusion and an actual loss of one’s way. We have gone astray and we can only pray and act like squeaky wheels with our church leaders to let them know that we see through their banal view of what it means to be Christian.
LikeLiked by 2 people
There is a hunger out there that is met more often by people like Jordan Peterson than by ordained bishops. I think those of us who want to support tradition need to seriously consider banding together to found private schools that will show the real life value of our ideals.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fr. Fessio had a vision for Ave Maria University to be a part of an entire community of Traditional Catholics. I think he was a visionary of what we truly need though the powers that be removed him and that final objective was never met. Although a good school it is operating under the modernist Novus Ordo guidelines.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The move towards socialism has done a great deal of harm to the credibility of establishment clerics.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Isn’t that the truth? Catholics have a rich heritage of writings from our Popes that disparage these ideologies but we now know better it seems though many of these clerics aren’t fit to wear the polyester facsimiles of proper priestly vestments that they like to sport these days.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree with you. Modern Christianity is a weak sop, compared to the overt muscular Christianity that spread the word through the world. It’s no wonder it is ignored, it only know how to follow the depraved.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes sir. A manly endeavor has now been turned into a effete social club run by social workers who are reluctant to speak of sin or more specifically the avoidance of sin; not to mention their lack of teaching on spirituality or prayer. Instead of the masculinity of early Christianity we are now acting like weak-kneed sisters embarrassed to stand for the Truths of Christianity.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yep, Pap, and that’s all it is. No Heaven, no hell, why bother?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I guess it gives one cover to be in what is essentially an NGO but collects money under the guise of Christianity.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pretty much, and many have evolved to be not much more than a NGO, and not one working for anyone but themselves, let alone God.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes it is interesting to note that those leaders of churches which promote LGBT lifestyles are usually themselves of that persuasion. No surprise there as the same thing happened many years ago among our psychiatrists and psychologists who followed in the footsteps of Sigmund Freud.
LikeLiked by 2 people
True.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Scoop, the Met Gala infuriates me. I don’t know if our British brethren are aware of the mockery. But Dolan is not fit be called Cardinal and James Martin continues to spread his sexual heresies.
The line is unrecognizable to the average person.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I know and yet is is so in our face that it baffles me that they don’t. Are they really so poorly taught or do they not hold anything sacred anymore?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Read this one today Phillip. Barnhardt is quite relevant in her assessment of our present Christian culture.
https://www.barnhardt.biz/2018/05/10/and-he-upbraided-them/
LikeLike