Tags
Anti-Semitism, Christianity, controversy, history, Judaism, Judeo-Christian heritage, United Kingdom, United States
Many here are aware that the basis of western civilization is in our Judeo-Christian heritage. Often we merely assert this, since we have known it all our lives, but it can be examined fruitfully.
I admire Melanie Phillips greatly because not only is she a very good writer and speaker, she is fully capable of thinking through things. And she does so here. Yes, this is a long read, but I think you’ll find it valuable to read the whole thing.
It has become the orthodoxy in the West that freedom, human rights and reason all derive from secularism and that the greatest threat to all these good things is religion.
I want to suggest that the opposite is true. In the service of this orthodoxy, the West is undermining and destroying the very values which it holds most dear as the defining characteristics of a civilised society.
In truth, in the United States, we don’t hear it explicitly very often, but in Britain, it is quite common in my experience. Not to mention very strident, not only from the secularists, but from Randians, and other assorted libertine groups.
Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.
Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.
“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.
[…] Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.
Far from utopia, however, this thinking resulted in something more akin to hell on earth. For the worship of man through reason led straight to totalitarianism. It was reason that would redeem religious superstition and bring about the kingdom of Man on earth. And just like medieval apocalyptic Christian belief, this secular doctrine would also be unchallengeable and heretics would be punished. This kind of fanaticism infused the three great tyrannical movements that were spun out of Enlightenment thinking: the French Revolution, Communism and Fascism. […]
In the Sixties, the baby-boomer generation bought heavily into the idea propounded by Herbert Marcuse and other Marxist radicals that the way to transform the West lay not through the seizure of political or economic control but through the transformation of the culture. This has been achieved over the past half century through what has been called a “long march through the institutions”, the infiltration into all the institutions of the culture — the universities, media, professions, politics, civil service, churches — of ideas that would then become the orthodoxy.
From multiculturalism to environmentalism, from post-nationalism to “human rights” doctrine, Western progressives have fixated upon universalising ideas which reject values anchored in the particulars of religion or culture. All that matters is a theoretical future in which war, want and prejudice will be abolished: the return of fallen humanity to a lost Eden. And like all utopian projects, which are by definition impossible and unattainable, these dogmas are enforced through coercion: bullying, intimidation, character assassination, professional and social exclusion.
The core doctrine is equality. Not the Biblical doctrine that every human being is owed equal respect because they are formed in the image of God: equality has been redefined as identicality, the insistence that there can be no hierarchy of values of lifestyles or cultures. There can no longer be different outcomes depending on different circumstances or how people behave. To differentiate at all is to be bigoted and on a fast track back to fascism and war.
So the married family was kicked off its perch. Sexual restraint was abolished. The formerly transgressive became normative. Education could no longer transmit a culture down through the generations but had to teach that the Western nation was innately racist and exploitative.
Subjective trumped objective. There was no longer any absolute truth. Everyone could arbitrate their own truth. That way bigotry and prejudice would be excised from the human heart, the oppressed of the developing world would be freed from their Western oppressors and instead of the Western nation there would be the brotherhood of man.
All this was done in name of freedom, reason and enlightenment and in opposition to religion, the supposed source of oppression, irrationality and obscurantism.
At the heart of it was an onslaught against the moral codes of Christianity. Those moral codes are actually the Mosaic laws of the Hebrew Bible.
[…] What they [Western “progressives” and the Islamists] also have in common is hostility to Judaism, Israel or the Jewish people. The genocidal hatred of Israel and the Jews that drives the Islamic jihad against the West is not acknowledged or countered by the West because its most high-minded citizens share at least some of that prejudice. Both Western liberals and Islamists believe in utopias to which the Jews are an obstacle. The State of Israel is an obstacle to both the rule of Islam over the earth and a world where there are no divisions based on religion or creed. The Jews are an obstacle to the unconstrained individualism of Western libertines and to the onslaught against individual human dignity and freedom by the Islamists. Both the liberal utopias of a world without prejudice, divisions or war and the Islamist utopia of a world without unbelievers are universalist ideologies. The people who are always in the way of universalising utopias are the Jews.
Do read it all, and there is a deal more than I have given you. The full title is: Secularism and religion: the onslaught against the West’s moral codes. It is simply a superb examination of where our basic morality came from, and how it has allowed us to exceed former civilizations by orders of magnitude, and how it has come to be endangered.
Aye. The world has gone completely insane it seems. Religions of common values created a culture with common values and accepted folks (with or without religious belief) who would abide by those common values. Now we that glue has lost its tackiness. It not longer holds. We are being torn apart.
Along those same lines, we have preferred to speak to migrants as individuals rather than evaluating them as a distinct culture. For when you do that, one can easily see that Muslim Culture is a wolf next to the sheep among Western Culture. So our leaders, both secular and religious are making a huge mistake to open our borders to such a predatory culture and have them live amongst their own gentle people. Our shepherds, it seems, are not just letting sheep in wolves clothing into our society but they are actually inviting the wolves themselves and telling the sheep that they should welcome them. It is total lunacy.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Aye, agree, completely.
And our societies are not forcing them to integrate. I know, we never did, but those immigrants were coming because they wanted to be like us, and while it took a generation or two to fully integrate, that was their goal, not so with these. Britain and Western Europe are in real trouble, and it doesn’t help that their so-called leadership can’t seem to figure it out.
LikeLiked by 4 people
I’m starting to think that the people are starting to get it and the leaders will either have to figure it out or lose power.
LikeLiked by 1 person
To a point. I talk most every day with Britons who more and more sound like we did back in 2014 or so. They get it completely – maybe better than we do. Our advantage is our government structure and constitution. What I don’t know is how representative they are. But I pray for them, and Britain itself.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Its about all we can do, NEO. We can’t vote for them too!
LikeLiked by 2 people
True. It’s up to them if they want to be free.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Secularism and Religion | nebraskaenergyobserver
I’m not sure that the attack on the moral codes is quite “at the heart of it.” Morality, like the family, is destroyed for the same reason that God is denied. That is, no authority outside of ourselves is to be acknowledged as legitimate since absolute personal autonomy is the supreme value. The same motivation which prompted the Fall.
Paradoxically this insistence on extreme autonomy is linked with authoritarianism because the State (or the University administration) can be used as an instrument to protect the sensitive, vulnerable ego against all perceived threats. Since individual autonomy is an illusion, and thus unrealisable, the authoritarian State becomes a permanent fixture because reality always imposes itself upon the ego and the ego always demands maximum protection.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I don’t think it necessarily a primary target. And that struck me as well, it is exactly the same reason as the Fall, I would have phrased it as trying to become as God. In a very real sense, pride.
Good point on the link to authoritarianism, I think many of us recognize it as a desire to escape reality, and your reasoning makes a deal of sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would recommend that people look at what has happened to Lauren Southern recently when she tried to visit the UK and was detained by UK police in Calais under Sch 7 of the Terrorism Act and denied legal representation and denied the right to remain silent and was subsequently banned from entering the UK. I hope she launches a claim for judicial review against the Home Office (and Foreign Office, if it was involved). I am deeply ashamed of my country right now and I pray that God will help us overcome the darkness that has a stranglehold on our political institutions. I hope that someone will come to power who has a love for the tradition of British civil liberties and who will repeal these awful laws and reform our executive services. May God help us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I know that the UK has been banning free speech for at least 8 years. Michael Savage is still forbidden to travel to the UK.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/may/3/michael-savage-still-banned-from-uk-petitions-dona/
LikeLiked by 2 people
What is also very disturbing about the ban on Michael Savage was his argument; arguably the same argument the allies used for the use of nukes against the Japanese: that it would save more lives in the long run than it would would take in the short. That fact, by all experts seems to hold water.
The caveat that the politically correct use against the use of nukes is that it kills civilians and especially children . . . as one cannot guarantee who might be killed by such an attack.
But if that is the criteria, then the proponents for the ‘politically correct’ abortion mills in these highly advanced Western Cultures has a lot of explaining to do. In the recent years in the UK, just under 200,000 babies both male and female have been eliminated and murdered and they hold their government up as a righteous civilization that is looking out for the innocent and shutting down all arguments to the contrary.
I wonder how they square their decision to allow this? Is it because a woman’s right to kill her child trump civilized morality? Or is it because they are saving millions more by limiting over crowding of the world? I’d like to know how they ban free speech for one and welcome in for the other. Seems that they have a particularly progressive left viewpoint that cannot be violated.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good points. Well, we all know how they justify it to themselves, by denying that a baby is a baby. It’s utter rubbish, of course, but that’s what they say.
I think it is just another method to attack Christianity, likely they would try it Moslems as well, but are too scared of them to, that seems to be what Christopher Hitchens is saying in his column this week. Could be, but it is tiresome to see our co-religionists banned from the country that brought freedom to so much of the world.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Indeed. It seems ‘free speech’ is only a right for the progressive left. All others must be subject to hate speech laws; banned or jailed accordingly.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Quite.
LikeLiked by 2 people
On the same subject, Nicholas, you might find this interesting or sad: https://youtu.be/uYqznMjlnso
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah I’ve seen this trend of censorship re: channels like Sargon of Akkad, The Rubin Report, Counterarguments, and various others. We may have to migrate to Minds.com if this continues apace. Frightening stuff. Conservatives make good businessmen, though: there will always be someone willing to put together a new platform.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lauren Southern has decided to sue the UK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eRGB2bfG72c.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I hope she wins and gives them a proper black eye.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Me too: I’d hate to see the rights that my ancestors fought for given away by our politicians.
LikeLiked by 2 people
They gave away a barrel full already, Nicholas. I hope you can somehow roll this movement back and regain some sanity. We have the same trouble here obviously, as does my Church and as does the entire Modern Globalist World. They are calling the shots right now . . . until the folks rise up and take their rights back.
LikeLiked by 2 people
There is no difference between secular and religion. Secular world goes about its business and doesn’t worry about a god or his commandments. Religions don’t care about god or his commandments. Case in point….the CC. It doesn’t give a damn about what god says. Then, the prot gatherings…they aren’t religions per se. But when I look back on the better prot gatherings, they were controlled services. A big show with great pipe organ music. The preacher yelling and making a big scene. Its all for the benefit of secular people who are hedging their bets. if there is a god maybe they will go to his heaven instead of his hell. Secular…religious…both different sides of the same unsaved coin.
LikeLike
It seems odd that people can experience such different realities, but i just dont see Christianity as being under attack. If anything is attackng it, it would definitely be the hyper-consumerism in the USA. Look at your president. He is merely a walking trademark. Sorry but America sold its soul to the devil of of material craving decades ago.
LikeLike
Sorry, but no. America does indeed have too much consumerism, but it remains the only western Christian country.
Sadly the rest have pretty much lost to the new religion of secularism. which will be overthrown by Islam.
GK Chesterfield was correct when he said, “When Man ceases to worship God he does not worship nothing but worships everything.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
So, you do not see simple recognizable facts that are impossible to miss: Christian prayer and mention of God forbidden in any schools though the majority of our citizens are Christian; a loss of common morality (maybe you’re to too young to have lost these things?) . . . stuff like, abortion, normalization of perverted sexual practices, loss of a common ethic that bound us all together in a diverse but ethically based society, loss of religious freedom . . . where you must do what your religion tells you is morally unacceptable but the state will put you in jail if you follow your religions principles et al.
I don’t know where you have been but I have watched this deconstruction and dividing people along lines of race, religion, wealth, age etc. I have watched the emergence of ideologies that once were anathema and now are taught and believed with almost cultish in nature and slavishly defended. A fundamental change to what liberty means is obvious: it is today the overall brainwashing and sexualizing of our children to the end that they might think of freedom and liberty as simple libertinism and self-indulgence. Nothing is more important it seems than to fit in with the politically correct left and they will abandon every right that they were given in order to live in accordance with the Globalist agenda . . . a new world order is the goal and they foolishly think that giving more and more power to government is the cure to our problems . . . give them more of what has already proven to be wrong. I guess we haven’t delved into a self-indulgent society far enough to render all of society a group of societies of one: in other words, an anarchy all about ourselves.
And our President, that the global elites of Europe love to hate because he doesn’t do political correct speak, is rolling back the powers of government; getting rid of laws that have placed untold burdens on the back of those people who merely want to live their lives without the government getting in our lives and making us dependent in every way to them: welfare is grown beyond everything we spend in our budget and they already sold our children’s future to the largest future debt that this world has ever seen. Trump has been a defender of the 2nd amendment, which if you had one, would at least make them think twice about a possible police state . . . which I think you are moving forward to at unprecedented speed. And thanks be to God, our President wants to control immigration into our country in a way that does not hurt the inhabitants of our country: he is not a believer in a world without borders and therefore breaks with the future goals of the elites like Soros and others.
That we can afford to buy things and we build things that, are at times nothing but junk, but also develop new drugs, and technologies that save lives and move us to be the largest provider of food and charity that this world has ever known. When you match our help in feeding the poor and providing medicines for the world then you can complain that the capitalism of America has created more ill than good. Until then, you and the most of the world wouldn’t have what the things that you have had it not been for the largesse of America. Your lifespans would be shorter and your poverty more intense. For our consumerism, it seems you are not opposed as long as you are reaping benefits of exporting your goods to the US as the consumers of your goods. Would you rather we do not buy your goods? You can then tear down your factories and try to sell your goods elsewhere. I’d hate to be a working stiff in your country and have you in charge of such decisions . . . for the success of the US is also your success and if you want it to fade away you do nothing but follow a path to slow suicide for your own country and citizens.
I think what you hate the most about Trump is that he is still a believer in God and the moral normalcy that has been trampled underfoot for many years. It is about time that good wholesome ethics finally are reinstated and lived. Maybe then we will put the “UNITED” back in the United States.
LikeLiked by 2 people
BZ. my friend.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, NEO. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people