Tags
In my last two posts, I have highlighted how in medieval days Mary was revered, not least because she was approachable. That’s important, I think. Women, as a rule, are seen as non-threatening as compared with even the best-intentioned men, by men but perhaps even more by women. It’s certainly true for me.
The idea of telling my sins to a man (especially when I was young) was a very frightening thing. Not so much Christ, of course, because He knew me better than I did anyway. But I wonder, and always will if Marian devotion had been available to me in those days if it might have made a difference. Not that I was any terrible ogre, mind, but I did things that even then I wasn’t proud of, and would have been embarrassed to tell my mom, so I wonder if knowing Mary then would have made a difference.
And now, as I start to draw near the end, Mary indeed provides me much comfort. Those of you who know me will know that I am divorced and without kids, and sadly see no possibility of that changing. And yes, Mary provides a comfort, nearly a companionship, that I find in no other way, anymore. She is the one I can talk about anything with. Strange how life works out isn’t it? But so it is.
But she is much more than that, of course. She is Theotokos, the Mother of God. And that is surely much more important than my little problems, but still, she finds time to tell me that she has talked to her Son about me and to comfort this old man, not that it is overt or anything, just a feeling.
But this very human and attractive side of Our Lady goes way back in our history. In our archives there is an article, bylined by Jessica (although I wonder, as it reads more as Chalcedon) speaking of The Protoevangelium of St. James
The Protoevangelium of St. James, which dates from the mid second century, belongs to that group of works which, whilst never canonical, was treasured by Christians for centuries because it filled in the gaps left by the Gospels. Nothing will shake my conviction that in St. Luke we have portions of the memoirs of Our Lady herself; where else could the Magnificat come from, or the story of the Annunciation. It thrills me to know that when I read these things, I am reading what the Blessed Virgin herself said; so I understand why it is early Christians wanted more.
The Protoevangelium filled the gap admirably. It described the circumstances of Our Lady’s birth, and how at the age of three she was brought by her parents to the Temple. It contains one of my favourite accounts of Our Lady. When she came to the Temple she was given to the High Priest who
set her down upon the third step of the altar, and the Lord God sent grace upon her; and she danced with her feet, and all the house of Israel loved her
How adorable is that?
Here is where those charming legends that we looked in my article on Lady Day in Harvest got their start. In the 2d century, well before the Scripture was canonized. We have always venerated Mary, she is one of the things that sets Christians apart. It is our kinder gentler side and something that is lacking in most religions which tend to be ‘by the book’ and the book alone. She introduces mercy into the whole thing, and yes, it shown forth in her Son as well. But it is, I think, one of the singularities that divide the Second Covenant from the First.
One of my favorite quotes ” A mans ego is as fragile as a woman’s heart” – God knew man and woman should be different yet complimentary. We serve a mighty and amazing God.
LikeLiked by 3 people
An excellent quote, and we surely do!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mercy is a beautiful concept to dwell upon, and it separates true Christianity from other philosophies. In ancient Greece and Rome friendship and mercy were not necessarily viewed as good in themselves, but often as means to ends. “Show mercy to your enemies, so that you may humiliate them” is a theme that crops up in Roman political writing – far from the ideals of Christ.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Mathew 9:13 ‘I desire mercy, not sacrifice’”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I am reading what the Blessed Virgin herself said; so I understand why it is early Christians wanted more.
Im going to say that word usage can be different in different groups. The term “Christian” is supposed to mean someone who follows Christ. Its use became a blanket term used by religions. Early “Christians” didn’t have much in the way of choices of religions. Christianity was spread by the disciples, mouth to mouth. So, if you will, there were two kinds of “Christians”….those who joined a religion, such as the state run religion of Rome, or one was saved sitting at home asking Jesus to reveal himself. The state run Roman religion persecuted those who would not join.
But that’s another post.
Im quite sure that even way back then that the saved would refer to other fellow saved as Christian. They do now. When to saved are talking amongst themselves, they will state that such and so is either a Christian or not a Christian. Even if the person in question is the biggest evangelist preacher in town, a fellow will say that hes not a Christian.
More to the point…the saved don’t consider the unsaved as Christians, no matter how big a cross they wear around their neck. Im here to say that early Christians didn’t venerate or do anything about Mary, except to read about her in what few passages there are about her. One cant set out Christmas decorations with out a manger scene with baby and Joseph and Mary. No problem there. Its the greatest story ever told. I know this wont be well received by those who consider themselves Christians. It never is. But if one bothers to think about it, one might come to a philosophical moment…….my religion says im saved by being a member….what about other religions? Im a Christian because of my membership, and youre not a member. So which religion is correct? They cant all be. But they can surely all be wrong.
This concept of a female deity floating around is as old as it gets. First it was Semiramis, then Diana. The roman state run religion changed the name plates on the Diana graven images to Mary, in order to bring in the Diana worshipers. they were not about to abandon Diana worship. Now, the Evil One has erected a female queen of heaven to ensnare billions, as it did befor. Friends….wake up and take a look. Believe the everlasting gospel. Jesus is the only way. he stands at your door and knocks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I am not catholic. I do not worship Mary nor the saints. I personally believe that saints such as Peter were able to speak to those who worship or pray to him, he would say ” I wasn’t worthy to die as Jesus, I made them crucify me upside down. If I am not worthy to die as Jesus, I am definitely not worthy to receive glory like Jesus” ….
Mary for me represents something entirely different than the Catholics see her as. I identify with Mary. For those that preach a prosperity gospel Mary stands as the antithesis to their gospel. Mary, blessed above all women, mother of God did not have an easy life on earth. She conceived at a time that could have cost her her life. Joseph having a divine visit stays with Mary and believes in the Holy Infant.
But Mary delivers under un-opportune conditions, in a manger. Humble beginnings to say the least. Then she is rushed away fleeing the persecution of Herod who wants to kill her baby. Mary and Joseph’s financial situation never changed for the better. Life never got easier even though she was blessed above all women and Jesus physically lived in their home.
And then she witness the scourging, the mocking, the crucified body of her Son. She watched his blood curdle in the sun, she watched him suffer in ways I will never witness my children suffer. She watched him die….
But Mary believed. She had faith…and so on the third day she rejoiced! So I don’t look at Mary as a deity. I see her struggle DESPITE BEING THE BLESSED ABOVE ALL WOMEN she struggled harder than I ever have…yet she kept faith even during extreme persecution….
This is the beauty of Mary – her perseverance. God could have found a virgin at the time easily…but there was something special about Mary. Her tenacity, her perseverance.
Again as I said about Peter, the way Mary is portrayed I cannot see her even desiring to be worshipped. That’s my non-Catholic perspective of Mary.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Beautifully said! In fact I think you’ll find most Catholics agree with you. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t let the affiliation thing keep me from loving my brothers and sisters in Christ. And thank you, I find Mary particularly an example of the perseverance God seeks in every woman of faith.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nor do I. She is an excellent example, that is part of why I felt like writing about her again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you did. I enjoyed your view.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hello Theway, glad you contributed. Id like to possibly give a few of your thoughts some different meaning.
First, you said mary and Joe struggled with little or no money. The opposite is true. Just my human logic says Jesus father, the Holy Ghost, would generously take care of his son. If you recall, the wise men showered Joseph and Mary and the baby with gifts and gold, and plenty of it. They were set for a good while.
Next is that Mary was blessed ABOVE all women. Not so…she was blessed amongst women. Many people are blessed, but there is only one Mary the mother of jesus. Plus, there were many virgins around, but one had the line of David form wife and husband. God knew it would be her. He did chose her because she was so nice and wonderful. She was in the line of David, son of Jesse. For better or worster, Mary was it, like it or not.
LikeLike
PS…one more thing. Peter made everyone aware that he was just a servant of Christ like you said. He was a nobody. But the bible doesn’t say he was crucified upside down. Its silent on his death. I don’t know where this upside down thing came from.But of all the fables, its probably the least harmful.
LikeLike
I found this while thumbing thru the Baltimore catechism…..
345. Q. What is the second Commandment?
A. The second Commandment is: Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
346. Q. What are we commanded by the second Commandment?
A. We are commanded by the second Commandment to speak with reverence of God and of the saints, and of all holy things, and to keep our lawful oaths and vows.
The commandments were carved in stone by the hand of God himself. These are not suggestions and are not up for debate. The catholic church with its billions of graven images and its flock bowing befor them has taken it upon themselves to get rid of the second commandment. The flock would start asking questions if the CC allowed its flock to see the real second commandment. Is this the church Christ founded…a church that lies about Gods commandments? A church that provides graven images and instructs it followers to bow befor them?
LikeLike