Tags

Lutheran St. Peter. and Paul Moscow Service
Vladimir Putin continues to crackdown on religions that are “non-traditional” to Russia, persecuting people because of their religious beliefs on a scale unknown since Soviet days. Interestingly, Lutheranism is considered one of the “traditional” religions (as are Baptists), so that some Protestant church work is still legal. In fact, Lutheran Christianity, as an alternative to both Orthodoxy and other kinds of Protestantism, is reportedly showing special appeal to Russians, particularly to intellectuals and scientists.
I stumbled upon an article entitled Russian Lutheranism: Between Protestantism, Orthodoxy, and Catholicism. in the East-West Church & Ministry Report (Vol. 11, No. 2, Spring 2003), a journal about Christian work in the former Soviet Union and Central and Eastern Europe. The authors are an Orthodox scholar and his assistant, Sergei B. Filatov and Aleksandra Styopina.
They survey the various Lutheran groups in Russia–which owe their “traditional” bona fides to the German immigrants Catherine the Great and other Czars moved in to help modernist the country, to the strongly Lutheran Ingrian ethnic group, and to Lutherans in the Baltic regions.
They say that Lutheranism appeals to Russians because its sacramentalism and liturgical worship preserves the sense of “mystery” that they value in the Orthodox Church. Lutherans also affirm the ecumenical creeds and thus much of what Orthodoxy teaches.
But Lutheranism is said to be more “intellectual” and to promote more “freedom.” Russians like the emphasis on the Gospel and on the Bible. But they think Lutherans are less “extreme” in their theology than other Protestants. (Whatever that means.) They appreciate how Lutherans teach that salvation is by grace alone, and yet avoid the predestinarianism of Calvinists.
Also the Lutheran theology of culture–the doctrine of the Two Kingdoms–allows them to affirm Russian culture in a way that other kinds of Protestantism can’t or won’t.
Though there have been some liberal Lutherans, most Russian Lutherans have avoided the liberalism of so much of Western Christianity. That too is a plus for Russians.
From: Why Lutheranism appeals to Russians
Dr. Veith also quotes a pastor of the Bible Lutheran Church in Irkutsk. He says something I find quite remarkable, perhaps astonishing.
There are two major religions in Russia, Orthodoxy and Lutheranism. Since the sixteenth century Lutheranism together with Orthodoxy has formed a part of Russian culture, science, and politics. Without the Lutheran tradition in Russia, only half of Russia would be left and the Lutheran part is not the worst half. You will become tired if you start counting everything that Lutherans have given to Russia. The regeneration of Russian Lutheranism is the restoration of the natural order of things.”
There’s considerably more at the link (and its linked article) but what I find interesting is that in Russia vis a vis the Orthodox Church, as with many of us in the west with our more hierarchical churches, there is a sense that the more decentralized Lutheran church, while still offering the mystery and sacramentalism of liturgical worship appears to be more honest because of its lack of ties to the government.
Seems to me something that most of us can relate to.
Very interesting, thank you for sharing. I wouldn’t have guessed Russia would be a place where Lutheranism would flourish. Especially interesting that it appeals to the intellectual class.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I gather it goes back to (and somewhat beyond) Catherine the Great. Lots of Germans in the ruling class, of course, although they had to be orthodox to rule (I think) the others could likely get away with it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for sharing this, NEO. I really enjoyed it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Neo, interesting post, as you know my wife is Confessional Lutheran- Missouri Synod. And I would be interested in what is the predominant sect of Lutheranism in Russia, as you know Lutheranism is monolithic. The article you referenced may enlighten, but I only read your post here.
It’s interesting to the degree that I know in the Missouri Synod, there’s a solid push for Creationism and Young earth theory, as I’ve told me wife, in many ways will always be a strong hinderance to my acceptance of her faith. I would surmise that not all Lutheranism follows this line of thinking, thoughts?
LikeLiked by 3 people
I don’t know either, but Dr Veith who LCMS says conservative, so I draw my conclusion from that. As far as I can see, it’s not particularly aligned with any of our western (mostly American) synods. But LCMS aligned churches are doing quite well in the Baltics, often in opposition to the considerably more liberal state Lutheran churches. That may be a clue. And the ELCA while still mostly liturgical tends to align quite closely to the (US) Episcopal church, especially corporately, many congregations are more conservative. Lutheranism, at least in the US, is monolithic in our sources, but practice, well, not so much.
So I have heard, and yes, it would be a problem for me as well – it’s very much a bridge too far, the creation story is, of course, a distillation of oral history and/or myth, not to be taken overly literally.
LikeLiked by 2 people
wELL GOOD BROTHER PHILLIP, TELL YOUR WIFE TO KEEP THE FAITH. Being born again didn’t stop me from keeping the evo that was drummed into my head. I still thought we evolved. But then early in my studies of biological science ( I mean early…like in 11th grade) I realized that evo cant work. natural selection works to a small degree, but that’s it. So from then I assumed the earth to be maybe 200,000 yrs old to account for things like Golbecki Teppi.and underwater cities and dinosaur bones. But recently, after taking a look at astrophysics, I had to cave in and go with the 6 day creation and an average earth age of 7 thousand years.Also , the planets agree. To make it simple and short, the magnetic properties of the planets aren’t millions of yrs old. The magnetic fields are generated by a type of dynamo, which is powered by a type of battery, which will run down in anywhere from 200,000 yrs to 10,000 yrs. This is by our calculations.All the planets have strong magnetic fields. This means they cant be more than a few thousand yrs old.
So , about three weeks ago, I had to concede that the bible is correct about the 6 day 7000 yr ago creation.That means that now I believe everything the bible says.
LikeLike
Pingback: Worth a gander | Notes On Liberty