Why do Catholics confess their sins to a priest? The priest is just another sinner, is he not? Why not just confess our sins directly to God?
This is the usual set of questions that Protestants ask when regarding the Catholic sacrament of Confession. They are reasonable questions, questions that I hope to answer in this article.
The sacrament of Confession is an ancient sacrament of the Catholic Church, dating back to its institution by Christ. In the early Church, public sins, like apostasy, were confessed publicly, in front of the congregation of Christians. Privately committed sins were confessed privately to a priest.
The writings of the first Christians shed some light on Confession:
The Didache
“Confess your sins in church, and do not go up to your prayer with an evil conscience. This is the way of life. . . . On the Lord’s Day gather together, break bread, and give thanks, after confessing your transgressions so that your sacrifice may be pure…” (Didache 4:14, 14:1 [A.D. 70]).
Ignatius of Antioch
“For as many as are of God and of Jesus Christ are also with the bishop. And as many as shall, in the exercise of penance, return into the unity of the Church, these, too, shall belong to God, that they may live according to Jesus Christ…” (Letter to the Philadelphians 3 [A.D. 110]).
Hippolytus
“[The bishop conducting the ordination of the new bishop shall pray:] God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. . . . Pour forth now that power that comes from you, from your royal Spirit, which you gave to your beloved Son, Jesus Christ, and which he bestowed upon his holy apostles . . . and grant this your servant, whom you have chosen for the episcopate, [the power] to feed your holy flock and to serve without blame as your high priest, ministering night and day to propitiate unceasingly before your face and to offer to you the gifts of your holy Church, and by the Spirit of the high priesthood to have the authority to forgive sins, in accord with your command…” (Apostolic Tradition 3 [A.D. 215]).
Cyprian of Carthage
“Of how much greater faith and salutary fear are they who . . . confess their sins to the priests of God in a straightforward manner and in sorrow, making an open declaration of conscience. . . . I beseech you, brethren, let everyone who has sinned confess his sin while he is still in this world, while his confession is still admissible, while the satisfaction and remission made through the priests are still pleasing before the Lord” (The Lapsed , 28 (A.D. 251]).
John Chrysostom
“Priests have received a power that God has given to neither angels nor archangels. It was said to them: “Whatsoever you shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever you shall loose shall be loosed.” Temporal rulers have indeed the power of binding, but they can bind only the body. Priests, in contrast, can bind with a bond that pertains to the soul itself and transcends the very heavens. Did [God] not give them all the powers of heaven? “Whose sins you shall forgive,” he says, “they are forgiven them; whose sins you shall retain, they are retained.” What greater power is there than this? The Father has given all judgment to the Son. And now I see the Son placing all this power in the hands of men [Matt. 10:40; John 20:21–23]. They are raised to this dignity as if they were already gathered up to heaven” (The Priesthood 3:5 [A.D. 387]).
Jerome
“If the serpent, the devil, bites someone secretly, he infects that person with the venom of sin. And if the one who has been bitten keeps silence and does not do penance, and does not want to confess his wound . . . then his brother and his master, who have the word [of absolution] that will cure him, cannot very well assist him” (Commentary on Ecclesiastes 10:11 [A.D. 388]).
The Early Christians believed that God gave His priests the power to forgive sins. They believed that a person must confess their sins to the priest in order to be forgiven. This is the same doctrine that the Roman Catholic Church teaches today.
What exactly does the Catholic Church teach on Confession?
First, the Church teaches that God alone can forgive sin. However, God chooses the way He wishes to forgive sin; using a priest. Even in the Old Testament God used His priests to forgive sin.
“If a man lies carnally with a woman… they shall not be put to death… But he shall bring a guilt offering for himself to the Lord… And the priest shall make atonement for him with the ram of the guilt offering before the Lord for his sin which he has committed; and the sin which he has committed shall be forgiven him.” (Leviticus 19:20-22)
God used a priest to administer forgiveness, and this did not take away from God’s power to forgive. He merely forgave the sinner through His priest. Just as God used His priests to forgive sin in the Old Testament, He does the same in the New Testament.
“Jesus said to them again, ‘Peace be with you. As the Father has sent me, even so I send you.’ And when he had said this, he breathed on them, and said to them, ‘Receive the Holy Spirit. If you forgive the sins of any, they are forgiven; if you retain the sins of any, they are retained.’” (John 20:21-23)
Having been raised from the dead, our Lord was here commissioning his apostles to carry on with his work just before he was to ascend to heaven. “As the Father has sent me, even so I send you.” What did the Father send Jesus to do? All Christians agree he sent Christ to be the one true mediator between God and men. As such, Christ was to infallibly proclaim the Gospel (cf. Luke 4:16-21), reign supreme as King of kings and Lord of lords (cf. Rev. 19:16); and especially, he was to redeem the world through the forgiveness of sins (cf. I Peter 2:21-25, Mark 2:5-10). (1)
One instance of God using a man to forgive sin is in 2 Corinthians 2:10. Paul speaks:
“And to whom you have pardoned anything, I also. For, what I have pardoned, if I have pardoned anything, for your sakes have I done it in the person of Christ.”
St. Paul made use of his power to forgive sins in Christ’s name, despite being a sinner himself. Just because a man is a sinner does not negate the fact that he has God given power. St. Peter was a sinful man, and yet he was able to preach and baptize people in Christ’s name. How is the power to forgive sin any different?
It should also be noted that the Apostles were given spiritual authority by Christ in Matthew 18:18:
“Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.”
This authority was passed down by the Apostles to their successors, from bishop to bishop, from bishop to priest. It is the Catholic Church who can trace her lineage all the way back to the Apostles, as the power to forgive sins are passed down to the Church’s priests. This is why Catholics confess their sins to their priest; their priest received the same power over sins as the Apostles.
As the Apostles were men who were given power to forgive sin, how would they have known what sins to forgive? The only way for them to know would be that the penitent tell them their sins. That is why Catholic confess their sins to a priest. Priests are (often) not mind readers. How else would they know what to “bind and loose”?
Many Christians claim to be “Bible-believing”. If they do not confess their sins as God wanted them to, are they truly Bible-believing?
— Patrick E. Devens
(1) https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/is-confession-in-scripture
All Along the Watchtower 
A lady walks into a confession booth. The priest says….My child, confess you sins. The lady says….you first.
LikeLike
“Priests have received a power that God has given to neither angels nor archangels.
Oh yes, the catholic priest is a “little Christ”
God bows himself in humble obedience to the catholic priest.
(;-D
LikeLike
Sad to see you going there again. You take a comment from one book and pretend it represents the view of the Church. The views of the Church are easily ascertainable in the Catechism. If you find it there, fine, if not, stop pretending it is what the Church teaches. There are, literally, millions of books written by Catholics, there is only one of them which is definitive about what the Church teaches. It’s a cheap shot Bosco and really not worthy.
LikeLike
I couldn’t help it. I wanted to point out that good brother Patrick falling prey to the idea that catholic priests have so0me special powers. I made it a point not to say anything of myself.
Interesting that you, good brother Chalcedon, disavow all catholic writings except the catechism. I don’t know if this sentiment is in the majority. Like any walks of life there are moderates and fire eaters. Im going to guess the fire eating catholics aren’t happy with this kinder gentler catechism./.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It isn’t that I disavow them, but that I want to put them into perspective. Your last comment is very much to the point, and Servus Fidelis/Scoop and co. left because they were unhappy with the direction of the blog. There are, indeed, those who want a much more ‘rigid’ line on just about everything, and there are those who want to liberalise. I find myself in the middle. Liberalism is the road to irrelevance, but so, too, I think, is rigidity.
That’s a long way of agreeing with your last point. It is the Catechism which, on matters of dogma, seems to me to be definitive, as it is meant to be, which is why I always come back to that if someone is saying ‘x or y is Catholic teaching’. On top of that is the fact that the Church has been around for nearly 2000 years in about as many cultures. So, to take one example, to those of us from an Anglo-Saxon background. de Montfort’s style of writing about Our Lady can be very uncomfortable, and quoting him at random could, indeed, give rise to the view he was encouraging us to worship Mary. But he has to be read in the context of his time and culture, when such language was common, and against the fact he knew he was not worshipping Mary, because worship is given only to God.
My point? To say that by selective quotation out of context, one can usually find something from 2000 years which will back up a prejudice, but that’s a poor game, as it leaves out context and Catholic dogma as defined by the Church.
As you know, I have been far from an uncritical defender of my Church, but the criticisms that you have been proferring are possibly the wrong ones.
I like the new style.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I also like Bosco’s new style. I would like to think the blog is not so much a ‘middle way’ between rigidity and laxity but an attempt to follow the example of our divine Founder and thus balance Truth with Love.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I prefer that description – but at the end of a long working day which began at 7:30 and isn’t ended yet, the mind goes for whatever is easiest!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, let me tell you something, you meaning everyone who reads these pages. My rage against religions is getting old and so am I. I believe my words are embedded in the readers here and will do the work they were meant to do. Anyway, I have passed the torch to the new generation, ie good brother Spaniard and others. Hopefully more will follow.
Let me tell you a true story.;
In Selma Alabama, at Ebineezer First Baptist Church, the pastor was in trouble all the time for preaching against segregation and Jim Crow laws. I mean, we are all on this plaet together, why cant we live in peace? The governing board of the church had to let the pastor go, or at least remove him from preaching. Either that or the Klan would burn down the church, something they were always doing anyway. So, they found a recent seminary grad who was brilliant and was degreed in latin. They figured they had a nice young man who would keep things calm and not rock anyones boat. his name was Dr Martin Luther King.
LikeLiked by 1 person
God moves in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform.
The oldest, and most ignoble of Protestant traditions is anti-Catholicism, and we have to move beyond it – if we do not hang together we shall hang separately.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t like the word anti catholic. it suggests that one is against Catholicism for no real reason, like being prejudice against blacks because they are black.
I don’t subscribe to any religion. Im sorry, but I will never have any sympathy for any religion. They keep my brothers in bondage.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Fair point, you have your reasons.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just as he did with his Hebrew priests.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A priest once told me that if he had to ‘choose’ which Sacrament he loved best, it would be Confession, as it is always a wonderful thing for a priest to witness a sinner ‘coming home.’ I wish Catholics made more use of this wonderful Sacrament and that priests preached more about its life-saving properties. What can be more profound than confessing one’s failings and hear the words “I absolve you…”? The difference between Confession and ‘therapy’ is infinite.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The exodus from this site was spearheaded by good brother Servus. I was sad that he and good sister couldn’t kiss and make up. But good brother Servus rubbed good sister Jess the wrong way with his priestess stuff. Im glad I was out of town when the fight happened. I was without a computer for three months. I hate to say this, but I noticed good brother Servus was on the hysterical side. he took his fellow fire eating cathols and his professed love of good sister jess and this site and jumped ship, like a Rat.
LikeLike
It saddened me. But I am not someone who can be pushed around, so when the same treatment was tried with me, it met with firm resistance. There are plenty of ‘Trad’ sites for those who want them, but this is not one of them. I am sad Jess left, but I fear there is no chance of her returning – she’s happy where she is.
LikeLike
Where in the world is she?
LikeLike
She is living happily about an hour and a half’s drive from where I usually live. She is fine – and sends you her love, and says she’s happy you are off the ‘naughty step’ 😊
LikeLiked by 1 person