Tags

Venerable Pope Pius XII
It has been said that Pope Pius XII, during World War II, did not do much to help the Jewish people, who were victims of Hitler’s Nazi terrorism. Pius is portrayed to have seemingly turned a blind eye while the Jews suffered terrible persecutions under Adolf Hitler. This charge, like many other allegations against the Church, is simply not true.
Pope Pius, in reality did quite a lot to protest the Nazi cause, and also made extreme efforts to save the lives of the Jews. Fr. Leo Chamberlain, in his article, The end of the ‘Hitler’s Pope’ myth, writes:
“This is a good moment to mark the Church’s witness against Nazism. Eighty years ago, on March 14, 1937, Pope Pius XI issued Mit Brennender Sorge (“With Burning Anxiety”), an encyclical, pointedly written in German, condemning Nazism. “Whoever exalts race, or the people, or the state, and divinises them to an idolatrous level, perverts an order of the world created by God,” the pope wrote.
“Pius XI’s secretary of state was Cardinal Pacelli, the future Pius XII. He distributed the text, which he had helped to draft, secretly within Germany. Four years earlier, in 1933, he had negotiated a concordat between the Holy See and Germany, not to appease Nazism but to have some means of holding the Nazis to account through an international treaty. The regime referred to him as “Jew loving”: he had made more than 50 protests against Nazi policy, the earliest coming just days after the passing of the Enabling Act, which granted Hitler the power to enact laws without Reichstag approval. Pacelli was regarded as so anti-Nazi that the Third Reich attempted to prevent his election as pope in 1939.” (1)
In his encyclical Summi Pontificatus, Pope Pius XII asked that all Catholics “will be mindful in imitation of the Divine Samaritan, of all these who, as victims of the war, have a right to compassion and help.” (2)
Pius is writing of all the victims of the war, especially the Jews, that they may receive aid.
Mgr. Jean Bernard, a former inmate of Dachau, accounts of the reaction to any Vatican protests against Nazism:
“The detained priests trembled every time news reached us of some protest by a religious authority, but particularly by the Vatican. We all had the impression that our warders made us atone heavily for the fury these protests evoked … whenever the way we were treated became more brutal, the Protestant pastors among the prisoners used to vent their indignation on the Catholic priests: ‘Again your big naive Pope and those simpletons, your bishops, are shooting their mouths off .. why don’t they get the idea once and for all, and shut up. They play the heroes and we have to pay the bill.'” (3)
From reading this far, one gets the idea that Pope Pius XII adequately spoke out against the Nazis and their treatment of the Jews. But the pope did much more than merely condemn Nazi behavior.
Robert A. Graham S.J., writes:
“In 1943 the German ambassador to the Holy See, Von Weizsaecker, sent a telegram to Berlin. The telegram has been cited as damning ‘evidence’ against Pius XII.
” ‘Although under pressure from all sides, the Pope has not let himself be drawn into any demonstrative censure of the deportation of Jews from Rome … As there is probably no reason to expect other German actions against the Jews of Rome we can consider that a question so disturbing to German-Vatican relations has been liquidated.’
“Von Weizsaecker’s telegram was in fact a warning not to proceed with the proposed deportation of the Roman Jews: ‘there is probably no reason to expect other German actions against the Jews of Rome’. Von Weizsaecker’s action was backed by a warning to Hitler from Pius XII: if the pursuit and arrest of Roman Jews was not halted, the Holy Father would have to make a public protest. together the joint action of Von Weizsaecker and Pius XII ended the Nazi manhunt against the Jews of Rome. 7,000 lives were saved.” (4)
In addition to this accomplishment, a near 80,000 baptismal certificates were issued by Church authorities, under the pope’s direction, to Hungarian Jews. The baptismal certificates made it appear that the Jews were actually Catholics, thus saving them from the Nazis. (5)
Venerable Pope Pius XII did quite a lot of good for the Jews, protecting many of them from the Nazis, despite what many may want one to believe today. There should be no question about his character and courage, especially when confronted by the power of Nazi Germany.
Albert Einstein, who had escaped Nazi Germany, said in 1940:
“Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler’s campaign for suppressing the truth … I am forced thus to confess that what I once despised I now praise unreservedly.” (6)
Pius should be viewed not as Pontus Pilate, who allowed Christ to be crucified, but as a hero, who took extreme efforts to save the Jews.
— Patrick E. Devens
O Venerable Pope Pius XII, who had on earth great courage to preach the word of God, vigor to repel the enemies of the Church, and zeal for the Holy Name, pray for us poor sinners. May we, O Pius, have a double portion of thy righteous qualities in defense of our holy Church. May we never abandon our duty to defend the faith, with fortitude, wherever we are and in whatever state God hath put us. Venerable Pius, may we, like thee, show the radiant glory of our Holy Lord in everything we do and say. And this, through the graciousness of the Divine Majesty, to Whom we humbly ask thee to pray for our benefit and protection.
Through Christ our Lord. Amen.
(1) https://catholicismpure.wordpress.com/2017/03/12/the-end-of-the-hitlers-pope-myth/
(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/860-000-lives-saved-the-truth-about-pius-xii-and-the-jews
(4) Ibid.
(5) Ibid.
(6) http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/issues/march-10th-2017/the-end-of-the-hitlers-pope-myth/
The Catholic Church , the Vatican…..long time friend and protector of the jewish people….three cheers for the CC!!
Hip Hip Hooray
Hip Hip Hooray
Hip Hip Hooray
LikeLike
Why did Pius XII not condemn the holocaust during the war? Because his priests were not saying to him that these concentration camps were extermination centers. Why did they not inform him of these terrible “death” camps? Because these camps were work and transit camps as the forensic examinations since the fall of Communism have shown.
LikeLike
Why did Golda Meir recognise him as a righteous gentile? It is a moden fashion to virtue signal at no cost to oneself, Pius XII did not enjoy that luxury. If you think the camps were not death camps, then you are mistaken. Have you ever talked with survivors?
LikeLiked by 4 people
Always necessary to recognize conditions at the time. At the time when what he said might have made a difference, well, where physically was Rome? Perhaps maybe in the middle of Germany’s major ally. What exactly was anything he did publically going to do? Martyrdom is one thing, but how exactly was martyring pretty much all of the leadership of the Catholic church going to help? Martyrs all have one thing in common, they are dead, and their influence on the enemies of the Faith is nil. And in fact, he arguably did more than the Protestants in Germany, although there also, there were men of valor.
He did what he could, and more than should be expected of him. Just as St. John Paul II did in communist Poland.
LikeLiked by 3 people
The comparison with JP II in Poland is apt. The Pope knew that ‘grandstanding’ against the Communists would be counter-productive; so he did what he could in public statement and in private acts. No-one accuses him of ‘being silent’. Virtue-signalling on the part of Pius XII would only have brought greater and more violent retribution against the Nazi’s victims. Sometimes it is harder to be silent than to speak; that was Pius XII’s martyrdom…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Agree, Francis. Much harder, I suspect.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The total number of Jews under German control was around 4.5 million and yet there were more than 4 million claims for benefits from the West German government on the part of survivors. Do the math..
LikeLike
You really think that disproves the Holocaust?
LikeLike
And I suggest rather then use the anti-semitic IHR as your source, you try the official figures here:
Click to access Summary%20of%20Major%20Holocaust%20Compensation%20Programs.pdf
LikeLiked by 1 person
What are you actually implying?
LikeLike
I had a friend, growing up who had been assigned to CCA, 4th Armored Division in World War II. He was one of the Americans who liberated Ohrdruf, near Gotha. This was a satellite camp of Buchenwald. He was there when General Patton was sickened by what he saw. This was not an extermination camp, although it did an exceptionally good job of it. He could talk about everything he saw in the war, but not the camp. He tried once when I was studying World War II in college. He simply ended up staring into space with tears streaming down his face, a man who had lost his friends all across Europe. The video is quite disturbing.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The British Army liberated Belsen, again not a deliberate ‘death camp’ but a place where thousands died of disease, starvation, casual murder etc. Ordinary British soldiers could not believe the sights that met their eyes when they arrived there, and these were hardened soldiers.
LikeLiked by 2 people
That’s the thing, with your guys at Belsen, ours at Ohrdruf, and in fact the Soviets at the camps in Poland. These were hardened combat soldiers who had fought their way all the way across Europe – there wasn’t much they hadn’t seen, yet they were sickened and appalled, and not one of them ever doubted what they had fought for.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wait a second, I believe the fact that the Nazis exterminated the Jewish people has been well settled. Furthermore, any credible historical argument against the consensus view has been laid to rest when David Irving couldn’t even win his liable suit.
Ironically, the court discovered that it was a point of view held by Irving due to his own bigotry without ever having to put a survivor on the stand.
LikeLiked by 3 people
One of Irving’s ‘arguments’ I believe, was to state that there is not a shred of paper evidence linking Hitler to the death camps. But Hitler’s Nazi subordinates had read Mein Kampf, where his hatred of the Jews is spelt out. Hitler deliberately perpetuated the myth, put out by ordinary Germans, that ‘if the Fuhrer knew what was going on he would put a stop to it.’ This is risible; a sick joke. He knew and he authorised it, albeit giving his minions leeeway to carry out their own sadistic response to his wishes.
LikeLiked by 3 people
And that is why many of us, now like me at second hand at best, are not willing to allow even a whiff of denial to pass unchecked. Do I have some sympathy for the average German caught in this mess? Of course, we’ve all seen government run unchecked. But I’d have the same reaction to attempts to excuse Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, or any of the others. It’s something that must be guarded against. Patton and Eisenhower were prescient, they both said they brought Congressmen and reporters to that camp because people simply ould not believe it existed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
In college, I took a History of the Soviet Union class, we read a text by an author named David Hoffman who wrote a Stalin apology, I was livid the entire discussion of the book. The professor didn’t agree, She’s Orthodox, but she just wanted to see the reactions. Ha! She was even impressed with my “righteous anger”
LikeLiked by 1 person
She’s right, I think. We need to read it all, which doesn’t imply we should believe everything we read. We did much the same in college, I still read things from all over the place, quite often one gets an unexpected insight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There is definite knowledge to gain by understanding all arguments. We can read simply to have a better understanding to refute such positions. A good defense of truth is a good offense… yeah I don’t think that’s an actual saying.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t either, but it should be! Consider it stolen. 🙂
LikeLike
I once read an interesting book about the help some Catholics gave to Jews in Poland (and bear in mind that in Poland, if you were caught helping to save Jews, you would be instantly shot yourself). The author made the point that in a country overrun by evil men most people would keep their heads down in order to survive; a few would risk their lives to help the Jews; and some more would actively collaborate with the enemy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Always more or less true, I think. When I was in school, we were taught that in our Revolution the population was divided in thirds, one third Patriot (excuse the terms), one third Tory, and one third neutral. My guess is that often the neutrals were a large majority, unless something was going on locally. And that’s without either side being really evil (mostly). Thing that always fascinated me about the Jews in Poland during the war (is it possible to have anything less s
left to lose?) is that the uprising in the Warsaw Ghetto in 1944 supposedly started with one pistol and magazine, and grew from that. One person always matters. Something we shouldn’t forget.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Some, such as Auschwitz, were also work camps. Others in Poland, such as Belzec, Chelmlo. Sobibor and Treblinka, were built simply to kill people. They designed no facilities for sleeping and eating (or working) as everyone was murdered very quickly on arrival. As survivors were only a tiny handful and these camps were completely destroyed by the Nazis before the end of the war, news about them only trickled out later.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No-one ever thought Pius XII was anything other than courageous in his witness towards the Jews during the War, until Ralph Hochhuth’s mischievous play “The Representative”, which was then taken up and twisted further by the mischievous writer John Cornwell.
LikeLiked by 2 people
It seems that the people of recent times have done more damage to history than people of any other era.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Most of the recent history that I’ve seen come out on the subject is a defense of Pius XII’s action. In fact, even the popular histories like National Geographic ran a documentary pope vs. hitler. Cromwell’s book is a bit dated nowadays with the moving consensus.
LikeLiked by 2 people