Tags
Catholic Church, Catholicism, Christian theology, Christianity, controversy, history, The Trinity

St Gregory of Nazianzus
Although Nicaea gave us the basis of the Creed which bears its name, it failed to say much about the Holy Spirit. It was left to St. Basil and St. Gregory Nazianzus to show that the Spirit, too, was of the same Substance as the Father and the Son. Their greatest achievement, however, was to make sense of the One-ness and the Three-ness of the Trinity.
The Trinity was of the same Substance: the Father was God, the Son was God and the Holy Spirit was God – but the Father was not the Son, neither was either of those two Persons the Holy Spirit, although they are what the Father is in Substance. They came up with the word hypostasis to express the difference. The Son and the Spirit are what the Father is (God) but they are not who the Father is. They relate to each other as Persons in a communion of love which is not to be explained.
The relationship between Father and Son is that the former begets the latter. This mode of eternal filial origination is the distinct hypostatic character of the Son – His Sonship lies in that He is begotten of the Father (before all worlds, God of God, True light of True light, begotten not made).
How has he been begotten? I re-utter the question with loathing. God’s begetting ought to have the tribute of our reverent silence. The important point is for you to learn that he has been begotten. As to the way it happens, we shall not concede that even angels, much less you, know that. Shall I tell you the way? It is a way known only to the begetting Father and the begotten Son. Anything beyond this fact is hidden by a cloud and escapes your dull vision. [Oration 29.8 6]
The Spirt issues perennially from the Father, and this mode of eternal spiration is the distinct hypostatic character of the Spirit, who, however, proceeds from the Father through the Son. The Spirit’s mode of origin – spiration, is what distinguishes the Third Person of the Trinity from the Second.
What, then, is “proceeding”? You explain the ingeneracy of the Father and I will give you a biological account of the Son’s begetting and the Spirit’s proceeding – and let us go mad the pair of us for prying into God’s secrets. What competence have we here? We cannot understand what lies under our feet, cannot count the sand in the sea, “the drops of rain or the days of this world,” much less enter into the “depths of God” and render a verbal account of a nature so mysterious, so much beyond words. [Oration 31.8]
So, all Three Persons are God, but each in a distinct, hypostatic realisation. The Divine Nature is not a common property of three different entities, it is, as St. Gregory showed, a personal being (that of the Father) that is hypostatically realised by the Son and the Spirit as they each derive from and relate back to the Father. The Father is the dynamic cause of the Trinity – Three Persons, One Substance.
This I give you to share, and to defend all your life, the One Godhead and Power, found in the Three in Unity, and comprising the Three separately, not unequal, in substances or natures, neither increased nor diminished by superiorities or inferiorities; in every respect equal, in every respect the same;
Just as the beauty and the greatness of the heavens is one; the infinite conjunction of Three Infinite Ones, Each God when considered in Himself; as the Father so the Son, as the Son so the Holy Ghost; the Three One God when contemplated together; Each God because Consubstantial; One God because of the Monarchia.
No sooner do I conceive of the One than I am illumined by the Splendour of the Three; no sooner do I distinguish Them than I am carried back to the One. [Oration 40.41]
St. Gregory himself, rightly warns us that to engage too much in theological reflection led to the danger of dazzling the mind by speaking about mysteries that even the angels cannot comprehend. After that little excursion – something upon which we can all agree.
I think patristic teaching on the Trinity should be a staple of any Christian upbringing or catechesis, regardless of denominational affiliation. The Athanasian Creed would be a good start on teaching people the orthodox understanding of the Trinity within the church.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t disagree, but the problem may well be that while the Catholic Church, the Lutheran church (it’s part of our Confessions in the Book of Concord), parts of the Anglican Confession, and some of the other liturgical churches, it’s not common in the others, and even in ours is mostly used on Trinity Sunday.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s good to have you back again, Neo. What you said, I had in mind as I typed my comment. I grew up Southern Baptist, where knowledge of patristics and the ecumenical creeds, was virtually non-existent among the laity. I know I can only speak of the congregation in which I grew up, but it seems to me the same applies to the majority of Baptists and many of groups that fall within the revivalist traditions. My first exposure to patristic studies came from Lutherans, specifically the LCMS variety. Nonetheless, I think study of patristics and the historical developments of our faith, could provide a much-needed sense of grounding, balance, and depth within all traditions.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks, Steven, I had a project going that took ridiculously long days, and it was getting a bit too sharp edged here, or maybe I just needed a break. 🙂 I hear that, I grew up in the old Evangelical and Reformed, the American version of the Prussian state church, now part of UCC, didn’t get much there either, don’t think it even came up in confirmation, even in the ELCA, it gets mentioned, probably more in the MS, though.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I understand, and you are correct that things were getting rather nasty for a while. I had to take a mental break from this blog as well. I don’t know much about the UCC, but what I do know about it, it sounds like an interesting animal. Did you ever have time to read the Luther book by Olivier?
LikeLiked by 2 people
No, I haven’t. The list is long, and time always seems short, somehow. There’s a movie out for the 500th anniversary as well, two versions, I guess, one generic Lutheran, and one for WELS. Saw a review, by Gene Veith (LCMS) he says both are good, sort of a docudrama, and fairly accurate. Have to see if I still have the trailer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I may have to check out that movie. I slowed down in my theological/historical reading for a good while, and it’s only just now beginning to pick back up. So many books on my shelf I haven’t yet read!
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, here, there, and everywhere, and then there is my Kindle.
LikeLike
UCC is an odd beast, E&R, Congregationalists coming down from the Puritans, Dutch Reformed, and more. I grew up in one in Indiana, close to Lutheran, my sister belonged to one in PA, mostly Dutch reformed, my other sister in Fargo, never did figure that one out! The heritage seemed to have more to do with the individual churches, than anything else. Talk about syncretic.
LikeLiked by 2 people
We should get our fellow parishioners to read Athanasius’ On the Incarnation and Basil’s On the Holy Spirit. Short text.
For more advanced and eager learners, St. Augustine’s work on The Trinity.
LikeLiked by 3 people