Tags
Catholic Church, Catholicism, Duty, God, Grace, Queen Elizabeth II
Neo’s post yesterday was a deserved tribute to a Head of State who, unlike many others, attracts no opprobrium and who has no axes to grind or agenda to pursue. She is Queen by Grace of God, and as a practising Anglican she takes that seriously; this is, for her, a sacred trust and she cannot just hand it over because she feels tired or would like a more restful life. She has, of course, the example of her uncle David before her, the Edward VIII, who found he could not discharge his duty without the woman he loved by his side, and slipped off into gilded exile and a life of pointless hedonism. Ironically, he might be said to represent the modern way of being; what mattered to him were his feelings and his personal fulfilment; that it all ended as it did, on a dying fall, in a life which achieved nothing, with the great gifts he had been given going to waste, might not surprise those such as the Queen who find that duty is a better guide to a life well-lived.
Duty is much out of fashion in our world. It has connotations of the things the world most hates – self-denial and even self-sacrifice, with no thought of reward. What’s the deal, it seems to say? I live this one life I have for others? What about the most important person in the world, ME? Who lives for ME?’ The Christian message tells us this is not the only life, and that we do not live it for ourselves except in what, to the secular mind, seems the oddest way. Here, in this vale of tears, we prepare ourselves for the life of the world to come, and hope, pray and work that we might be fit for it. That does not mean that we can, in any wise, merit our salvation, but it does mean we can witness to the mercy and the grace we have received by following the example of the Lord through whom we are redeemed.
In the case of the Queen, this has meant a life of service to the country. It would be easy, which is why it happens so often, for the cynic to say how nice it must be to have all your wants supplied in return for duties which are often largely ceremonial; but as usual, the cynic misses the point. The Queen is a symbol of national unity, and her very longevity in an age of such rapid change has helped hold together a nation which otherwise might have found itself bewildered by it. That she is a wife, mother, grandmother and great-grandmother enables people far removed from her to find points of identification; being Queen does not mean your children make fairy-tale marriages and live happily ever after.
But through the bad times and the good, through the long journey from Empire, through decolonisation, Europe and now Brexit, there is one constant – Queen Elizabeth II. She is a reminder that our system of government is not merely secular. At her coronation she was anointed with sacred oil, and she consecrated herself in God’s presence to the service of the nation. She does it not for herself, but because she told God she would do it. God’s response we can see daily. We shall not, unless we are very fortunate, look on her like again – so God save the Queen!
It strikes me that there is a most famous flag hoist from about 200 years ago that is on point, I’m quite sure all know it. “England expects every man will do his duty”. said the flags from Lord Nelson at Trafalgar.
It is said that Lord Nelson dictated the signal with ‘confides’ rather than ‘expects’, and that the signals lieutenant asked for the change because ‘confides’ would have to be spelled out.
An interesting story, and one that illuminates much of our journey. Neither contradicts our joint ethos and history, our great leaders (including the queen) have always confided much to us, but our countries have also always expected us to do our duty, as well, as it has those in leadership in our countries.
Chalcedon is correct of course, the queen’s uncle David is the prototype of many now in our society, essentially useless mouths living useless lives off the fat of the land. While the queen, as did her father and mother, exemplify the costs, and the rewards of living up to Nelson’s signal.
I doubt I am alone in remembering the Queen’s mother, also Queen Elizabeth broadcast during the Blitz, where she told London and the world. “The children will not leave unless I do. I shall not leave unless their father does, and the King will not leave the country in any circumstances whatever,”.
Doing one’s duty is often hard, unpleasant, unrewarded, dangerous work. It is also the mark of one who makes a difference. The Queen has lived up to her heritage, and made a difference, to her country, and to its friends, and to its enemies, and continues to do so.
Long Live the Queen – God save the Queen!
LikeLiked by 4 people
Amen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Im sorry but, you third world Brits revel in your Lord Nelsons victories, in yesteryears, when men floated on wooden rafts with bedsheet sails. In those times it was anyones game as to who WON a particular “battle”. I guess theres nothing wrong with having pride in ones country. Even Mexicans have pride in their dirt parking lot they laughingly call a country.
LikeLike
Nope, Bosco, Nelson won because he led his people properly, and trained them well. Just as Alexander won for the same reason. It’s a timeless reason, that the queen learned from her parents, who learned it from their’s and by studying history.
And I suspect without Nelson, California would be a Spanish colony still, instead of a Mexican one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s a health unto Her Majesty
With a fa la la, lala laaaa la
Confusion to her enemies
With a fa la la, lala laaaa la
And he that will not drink her health
I wish him neither wit nor wealth
Nor yet a rope to hang himself
With a fa la la lala lala lala laaa
With a fa la la lala laaaaa la
LikeLiked by 3 people
Cheers, then.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Edward VIII’s personality was known to his family and to the Court very early on; when he was Prince of Wales in the 1920s, his private secretary, Sir Alan Lascelles, confided in Baldwin the Prime Minister, that every time the Prince went hunting, he prayed that he would break his neck. Baldwin responded: “May God forgive me, but I pray the same.” When George V was old and ill, he lamented, “When I die that boy will ruin the monarchy within a year.” Idle, feckless, pleasure-seeking, self-centred – Edward VIII was the antithesis to his shy, delicate, loyal and dutiful brother, Bertie, later to be George VI. As has been observed, perhaps Mrs Simpson did the country a great service in removing him from the throne.
LikeLiked by 3 people
She did, he would have been a dreadful monarch.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I also read that his Abdication speech was largely written by Churchill; that makes sense as it seems uncharacteristically dignified and lucid for the King himself to have composed it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, it was – and you are correct.
LikeLiked by 2 people