Tags
In today’s Gospel Luke 10:25-37 Jesus provides an answer to the question of ‘who is my neighbour’? Because the story is so familiar, we are in danger of missing how revolutionary his answer is. The Samaritans were a despised minority in ancient Israel. They were Jews who has apostasised, who had adopted the gods of their conquerors, and who had lapsed from the Law. Orthodox Jews despised them. If asked whether they loved their Samaritan neighbour, few Jews would have answered in the affirmative. But in his story, Jesus turns the tables. It is a Jew who is set upon by robbers and beaten and left for dead. The priest passes him by, as does the levite. These were religious men who knew the Law. Perhaps the priest did not want to make himself ritually unclean by touching a man who was bleeding? If so, he knew the letter of the Law and nothing of its spirit. The same was true of the Levite, who perhaps did not consider the wounded man his neighbour? If we assume (though we are not told it was so) that the injured man was Jew, he received short shrift from his fellow Jews. In his wounded state, it was hard, if not impossible for a passer-by to tell what nationality he was; in this way he becomes a symbol of mankind itself. The two religious figures pass by on the other side. we cannot know their motives, but then they don’t matter, it is their actions which count; maybe they are full of faith, but that faith does not evidence itself in anything by way of action when there is someone lying there who needs their help.
It is left to the representative of the despised minority to show the compassion one human should show for another. He does not ask if the man is Jewish or a Samaritan, he asks nothing – he acts. He shows compassion. oil and wine did not come cheap, but he pours them out to help the injured man; staying at a nearby inn did not come cheap, but the Samaritan pays in advance – and promises the inn-keeper more money if it should be necessary. The Samaritans had fallen away from the Law, they we ritually unclean, they were to be shunned. Yet this man did not respond to such treatment by meting it out to others – he broke the cycle of mutual recrimination. He knew that an eye for an eye made the whole world blind. HIs heart went out to a man in trouble. Even the lawyer who had been trying to catch Jesus out could see the answer to the question of who the good neighbour was. Jesus’ advice to him to go and do the same is addressed to each of us.
These words of Jesus challenge us, not least at a time when there is so much tension in Europe and America over the question of who our neighbour is. If we say it is not economic migrant, but it is the refugee, is that the answer Jesus would accept? If we say it is the Christian refugee but not the Muslim one, does that make us the Good Samaritan? Our neighbour is not just the one who is like us, or who we like, or whom we think deserves our help. Does Jesus set a high standard for us? Yes, he does, because if it is the member of the despised minority who is the good neighbour, it challenges our attitude to despised minorities. Jesus says nothing about ‘illegal’ or ‘legal’ despised minorities, and he says nothing about building walls to ‘keep them out’. In choosing the Samaritan as the example of the good neighbour, Jesus poses uncomfortable questions about our attitude to strangers at (and within) our gates.
Both the priest and the levite were going to Jerusalem and may have had to carry out religious rituals. If they became ritually unclean by touching a dead or dying man it would have put a spanner in their works.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed – they knew the letter of the Law, but not is spirit.
LikeLike
A good piece, C. I don’t know if you’ve come across this interpretation before (I suspect it is patristic in origin): the wine used to clean the man’s wound represents the blood of Christ that cleanses us of sin and the “valley of tears”; the oil used to help the wound heal and seal it represents the Holy Spirit whom the Father gives to us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, I had heard that – seems good exegesis to me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, and an interesting example of analogy. It seems intuitively true, but the text itself doesn’t tell us to understand it that way – I can only assume inspiration from the Joly Spirit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed – an interesting and joyful typo too 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chalcedon – your last paragraph about immigration. I’m thinking back to a situation in the early 70’s when the immigrants were well-to-do posh English people, who drank and who played golf on Sundays, whom we called ‘white settlers’.
They came as a result of the oil, but then they seemed to have nothing but contempt for the community of the ‘quaint little fishing village’ (they liked the fishing village – they didn’t think so much of the inhabitants or their way of life). They even thought that it was OK for them to play golf on Sunday. The village had a referendum over whether or not to open the golf course on Sunday – and the vote was overwhelmingly against. I don’t think the ‘white settlers’ took this very seriously.
Should those villagers have considered the ‘white settler’ migrants as their neighbours? Even though the ‘white settlers’ had nothing but contempt for important traditions and the Christian way of life?
LikeLike
Yes, I see nothing of Jesus saying love only those who love and respect you, indeed my Bible has him saying we should love even those who hate us – as I am sure your Bible does too.
LikeLike
Chalcedon – I agree with you. The relevant passage from Romans is always at the forefront of my mind:
Bless those who persecute you; bless and do not curse. Do not repay anyone evil for evil. Be careful to do what is right in the eyes of everyone. If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone. Do not take revenge, my dear friends, but leave room for God’s wrath, for it is written: “It is mine to avenge; I will repay,” says the Lord. On the contrary:
“If your enemy is hungry, feed him;
if he is thirsty, give him something to drink.
In doing this, you will heap burning coals on his head.”
What is important here is that there are people who are our enemies. We are called upon to love these people, but it is very important to keep in the forefront of our minds that people who want to destroy the Christian fabric of our society (and have, to a large extent succeeded over the last 40 years) are very much our enemies. They are our enemies because, first and foremost, they have declared themselves at enmity with God.
Do you love those people who advocate abortion as a standard method of birth control and who are prepared to carry it out, for example? If so, how does this love that you have for these people express itself?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It expresses itself in a number of ways. One is negative – easy though it would be to hate them, I don’t; I remember they, too, are children of the living God and therefore have a unique value in his eyes – if I cannot see that, then I pray for enlightenment. I also remember that they are individuals, men and women whom I do not know, and so I pray for them – which is one of the greatest acts of love a Christian can perform.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Chalcedon – a good answer; that (at least) is what we aspire to – although few of us attain it (for example – I don’t).
LikeLiked by 1 person
In a way, it is easier because I don’t actually know anyone involved in that ‘industry’; might be harder if I did. But again, sometimes, knowing a person makes it easier not to be angry with them. Of course, I pray that they might have a change of heart and become enlightened about what it is they are doing – and am always heartened when that happens.
LikeLiked by 1 person