Tags
Africa, Anglican Church in North America, Anglican Communion, Anglican ministry, Anglicanism, Episcopal Church (United States)
I suspect many here have been surprised over the last few years on how many points of our faith Jessica, an Anglo-Catholic and I, a Lutheran agree on. In fact, we have been surprised as well, not least because Anglo-Catholics are rare in Nebraska, and Lutherans are just about as rare in England. Both exist, but you’ll look a while.
Historic Anglicanism and historic Lutheranism, while not the same, are pretty close cousins. And others are realizing it as well. They always have been, there has always been a rumor that Anne Boleyn was a Lutheran herself. The Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod (LCMS), the Lutheran Church Canada (LCC), and the new Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), the conservative breakaway from the Episcopal church, have been having talks for the last few years. And the thing is, they are finding that there is not that much room between them. We are not the same, and since we are conservative, we tend not to move off of what we have always believed, everywhere. As the committee says, we are not sister churches, in full communion, but we are first cousins.
On the other end of the spectrum, our liberal counterparts, the ELCA, and the Episcopal church have been in full communion for some time. But being liberal, they tend to be more accommodating. Here are some highlights from the report:
Instead of renewing the one historic church of the west as Martin Luther had desired, the Reformation of the 16th century ended up producing several distinct church bodies severely at odds with each other. In this process many sharp words were spoken and negative judgments delivered, by Lutherans against Roman Catholics, Reformed, and Anabaptists; by Reformed against the other three groups just named; by the Church of England in her classic formularies against Roman Catholics and Anabaptists; and by Roman Catholics against all who had left their communion. Remarkably, Lutherans and the church body later called Anglican aimed few if any direct shots against each other.
While not of one heart and soul, neither were our forefathers at daggers drawn with each other. There is in fact enormous overlap between successive editions of the Book of Common Prayer and how it took shape in church life, on the one hand, and the way in which the Book of Concord was reflected in the teaching, worship, and ethos of the Lutheran churches of Germany and Scandinavia. Accordingly, we can ascertain much compatibility between historic Anglicanism and Lutheranism in fundamental doctrine, liturgy, hymnody, and devotion.
For a considerable portion of the 18th century the ruling kings of England (who remained electors of Hanover) were practicing Lutherans and Anglicans at the same time; the Lutheran George Frederick Handel composed his church music mainly in England; and there was much formal cooperation on the mission field between some German Lutherans and the Church of England.
We should not overstate the case, however. The Lutheran chaplain of Prince George of Denmark (1653-1708) refused to commune him after he decided, on certain state occasions, to receive the sacrament alongside his wife, Queen Anne.
Rather than describe ACNA and LCMS–LCC as sister churches, we should acknowledge each other as ecclesial first cousins, closely related indeed, but not yet partaking publicly of the same Lord’s Table. Our church bodies share a common foundation in the Holy Scriptures and in their confessions. The Thirty-Nine Articles of Religion draw heavily on the Augsburg Confession and other Lutheran influences. Eight of the Thirty-Nine Articles are drawn directly from the Wittenberg Articles1 of 1536, a joint Lutheran–Anglican document. […]
Outsiders had viewed Anglicanism as endlessly pliable in matters of Christian doctrine, a form of church in which incompatible “parties” simply agreed to disagree. This perception has been sharply challenged by the emergence of the Global Anglican Future Conference (GAFCON), which has more adherents than the “mainline” Anglicans that include the Church of England, The Episcopal Church of the USA, and the Anglican Church of Canada. It is apparent that the divide in Lutheranism between the LWF and the ILC is paralleled by the division between GAFCON and the Anglican “mainline” churches of the Anglican Communion […]
Affirmation of the classical creeds goes hand in hand with deep respect for the ancient Fathers and for the practices of the Church of the early centuries. But as Christian antiquity assists us in the understanding of the Scriptures, it adds nothing to their content. We note and affirm the major role played by patristic studies among the Lutheran and Anglican theologians of the 17th century.
From the report, it looks to me as if one of the larger points we dispute has to do with the Real Presence, and yet in all three churches, there are varieties of belief, but we all admire the famous quote from Queen Elizabeth I:
“Christ was the word that spake it.
He took the bread and brake it;
And what his words did make it,
That I believe and take it.”
[Keep reading. . . .The report can be downloaded at this link.]
I’ve merely given you snippets here, the document itself covers much more, including how the evolution of civil power, and the Erastianism of the west since Constantine, has led to the startling fact that the supreme power of the Church of England and the State Churches of Scandinavia is not the Word of God, as understood by either the Anglican or Lutheran confession, but the will of a government that may be of an unbelieving mindset. That is a high price that the churches in our old homelands have, and are, paying for the benefits that alliance with the state may have provided.
I think that we are seeing the same split that has happened in our churches, happen now in the Roman Catholic Church as well, perhaps that means that the respective parts of that church will also draw closer to the corresponding parts of our churches as well. But I see no hope at all of all the splits in any of our churches healing.
Perhaps since we quoted Queen Elizabeth I above, we should also quote Queen Elizabeth II from the forward of a book celebrating her 90th birthday, published by Hope Together (and others) called The Servant Queen – and the King She Serves:
As I embark on my 91st year, I invite you to join me in reflecting on the words of a poem quoted by my father, King George VI, in his Christmas Day broadcast in 1939, the year that this country went to war for the second time in a quarter of a century.
I said to the man who stood at the Gate of the Year
“Give me a light that I may tread safely into the unknown.”
And he replied, “Go out into the darkness, and put your hand into the hand of God.
That shall be to you better than light, and safer than a known way.”ELIZABETH R.
Good post Neo. It seems to me that the Queen has set a very good example of how the head of a church should act – a shame that novice young fellow Francis has not thought to ask for advice from her. You’d never get HM talking in a press conference on a plane.
We are in an interesting place. Like you, I think the strains within some of our bigger churches are not going to go away. What I see in my Church is what I saw in my old one – but about 30 years ago. The orthodox still think that the heterodox won’t go too far, and the more moderate are willing to give a bit of leeway, whilst those who think they can see where that one will go, are not. There is zero evidence that if you give the liberals a mile, they won’t ask for 10 more – in fact quite the opposite.
The C of E has found a way of accommodating much of this, but it does not seem to me the Anglican communion has the same taste for ambiguity.
No doubt the Spirit will, as ever, lead us to where we need to be – with us kicking and screaming all the way 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, she’s a remarkable demonstration of what a leader duty- driven can accomplish. And sadly, he is an equally remarkable example of how loose lips sink ships, Sad to see. 🙂
What you saw then and now is also what I see between where I am, and where’ll I’ll likely end up. I think it the only outcome possible. Yet, I recognize that a good part of the trouble in the C of E and the Scandinavian churches is reporting to politicians.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In the C of E is it less bad than it was in that Parliament has effectively delegated its powers to the Synod.
Yes, if the RCC had a head as dignified and devout as the Queen, they’d be a lot happier.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That helps, likely a lot.
That is certainly true, actually, it’s true for my country as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“You’d never get HM talking in a press conference on a plane.” I love that remark. It’s a bit like my policy of never smiling at Year 7 pupils before Christmas. But these days they just see that as a sign of a miserable teacher.
LikeLiked by 2 people
My wife is Missouri Synod. I am very familiar with elements of her faith. I discerned for a long period whether to become Lutheran as to create some sort of unity in our family. I honestly don’t know if she’s given the same consideration to be Catholic. However, after a long period of time it came down to Eucharistic theology and I saw no equal to the faith of my youth and stayed with the Catholic Church. I would say in my case of having studied scripture a bit, I made theological judgement more so than average Joe would on the street.
Notwithstanding, I want to talk about the positives of faith in my marriage. Although my wife is not Catholic, her devotion to Lutheranism has inspired me a better practicing Catholic.
I would say that my personal experience is why I’m more sympathetic to the word Ecumenism than my other Catholic counterparts. We’re all reflections of experiences that have produced our natural biases.
Overall, I have decided I’d never intentionally cause my wife to doubt her faith from fear of sinking the entire boat–I doubt is possible. If my wife chooses to become Catholic, it will be a choice made by her own will.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’ve looked at it a bit, but not deeply. I can easily respect and honor what you say. I’m currently in the ELCA, and rather conflicted, I suspect at some point I’ll move to LCMS, and perhaps the Confessional church. For me, much of it is local, and the ELCA and RCC congregations here are quite bad. That’s not intended to denigrate any of them, except “Aunt ELKA”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Parishes and congregations take on lives and what I’d hate to call “politics” of their own. Unfortunately, often times it turns away those who are there to actually worship God.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep, and I really don’t see how it could be otherwise. If it is too bad, well one keeps looking. No reflection on any organizational church in this, we all have it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
God Save the Queen! She’s such a marvellous example to us all of how a Christian carries out their duties. I don’t know any 90 year olds who carry the load she does. 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 5 people
I can’t think of many 40 year olds who could, certainly not me. It’s sobering to think that she became queen the year I was born! 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
90 is the new twenty five.
LikeLiked by 2 people
She’s a wonderful example I think 🙂 xx
LikeLike
Yes, the Queen is remarkable, but in a twenty-first century globalised world (21GW) it has to understood that 90-Year-Old Monarchs (NYOMs) in More Economically Developed Countries (MEDCs) are a Very Unusual Phenomenon (VUP). As we consider her influence on the Church of England and the wider Anglican Communion (CEWAC) we have to admit as Catholics that she has achieved more gravitas than the present Pope, who seems to govern byTrampolining On Spiritual Sensibilities & Eternal Realities (TOSSER).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Part of it is the individual and the other part is longevity to influence. The Queen and Francis are not fair comparisons in this regard. If John Paul II was still alive and in good health because of his dominance of of post-Vatican II era that would be on par with Queen. Even then he’d still fall short on longevity.
LikeLike