Some people – of whom I am one – begin their Lent observances on Ash Wednesday, others on the first Sunday in Lent. The advantage of the first method is that you get to celebrate Sundays as a feast day in Lent, which allows of a relaxation of any Lenten sacrifices, should one want. But it is always a good idea to take up something new, as well as offer a sacrifice. Here, I have been helped by Gareth Thomas, who has introduced me to the letters of St Clare of Assisi to the Blessed Agnes of Prague. I had, of course, heard of St Clare, but knew nothing about this correspondence before the marvellous Gareth brought it to our attention yesterday- and with such a helpful introduction.
I am going to add it to my other Lenten task, which is to read the Book of Esther, and by one of those marvellous coincidences which mean it wasn’t one at all, the two go well together and give me much to think on. King Ahasuerus, who may have been Xerxes I, or Artaxerxes I, is a proud man, ruler, as he sees it, of all, and all were expected to bow to the whim of the King of Kings One of the ways in which he wanted to demonstrate his power and his enviable position was to show off his Queen, Vashti, to his nobles; when she refuses this order, she is punished and dismissed, and the King orders a search to be made for a new bride. The message was clear – women should keep their place and do as they are told.
The Blessed Agnes of Prague was offered a great and prestigious role as the wife of the emperor Frederick II, who, one hopes, would not have behaved as the Persian King did to his wife. But she declined the honour, preferring to devote her life to Christ. St Clare saw in her a kindred spirit – they had both spurned the riches and privileges on offer to them through the circumstances of their birth, to become Brides of Christ – as St Clare put it:
You took a spouse of a more noble lineage, Who will keep Your virginity ever unspotted and unsullied, the Lord Jesus Christ
Our society does not, I think, either understand or value such things, but those of us who have felt a similar call know what Clare and Agnes mean. To place oneself entirely at the disposal of Christ is a great calling, and the two women set an example to be admired – but how many of us can imitate it?
If the modern West fails to grasp the dimensions of the devotion shown by St Clare and the Blessed Agnes, still less, alas, does it grasp Esther, who is seen by some feminists as a bit of a wimp for not just standing up to Ahasuerus. But such a reading is, like so much of that sort of feminism, reductionist. To my way of thinking, St Clare and the Agnes are feminist heroines because they truly take a radical option, unencumbered by any thought that they have to imitate men and what men want and do. Their obedience to their spouse – Jesus – is absolute in a way that the male Franciscans clearly found hard. In submitting to their spouse, they were obedient to God in a way the men struggled with. There may be a lesson there if we can come to it.
It is always dangerous in our society to link the words ‘obedience’ and ‘women’ because of the way in which the former can be used to abuse the latter, but it should not blind us to the fact that God’s laws are not optional. As we shall see when we move on to Esther tomorrow, this was something she instinctively understood – where the men around her, power-brokers all – failed to grasp it.
Gareth Thomas said:
Happily I may be first to comment on this piece, as its arrival is neatly timed with my lunch break. I shall reply quickly before preparing for the afternoon lessons! I like the fact that you discovered Clare’s letters while reading Esther: that works well indeed!
I am particularly keen to join with you in calling Clare a true feminist. It is a great paradox that she fought for the freedom to be enclosed in San Damiano: the battle with her own family was hard won. They came to take her away by force but she resisted. Then she fought for the rule of poverty when the Catholic Church tried to force her community to live a different rule (in the Hugoline reforms). From my point of view, as one who is inspired by the Franciscan contemplative tradition, the example of the friars Rule for Hermitages is also an interesting paradox – with the brothers in a hermitage taking it in turns to be “mother” to the enclosed hermits.
Clare was devoted to Saint Francis but I have grown more and more to see that she was not his “little flower” hidden away in a convent, as the Franciscan tradition often seems to tell it. She was a powerhouse of spiritual discipline and a great intellectual who deserves in a very real way to be recognized as co-founder of the Franciscan movement (even more than Saint Bonaventure, in my view). Needless to say, my view is not entertained for a moment by male Franciscan historians! The Poor Clares have known it for centuries I think, but they keep their secret to themselves, while giving an indulgent smile to the chaps in brown habits who live in the reflected glory of the Little Poor Man of Assisi. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
JessicaHof said:
I am relieved you think I am on the right lines. And yes, I see just what you mean about feminism – for me it is about women being who they are meant to be, not some imitation of men, or something men want them to be – it is what God wants.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Smith said:
Very nice, Jess. You might also like to read the following article by a professor that my wife had when she studied for her masters degree in theology. Just scroll down to the Esther section if you like but I think you will find it all very interesting.
Click to access 11.14FiguresofMaryintheOldTestament.pdf
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gareth Thomas said:
Dave, that is a very useful article. The words of Joseph Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) in the article – about the “feminine principle” strike me particularly in relation to Clare’s letters to Agnes:
“As the epitome of the creation’s response to God, Mary plays a central role in the economy of salvation. She is infinitely subordinate to the role of her Son—God made man—but she is not thereby marginal! Rather, she is the portal of her Son, the perfect creaturely (and thus feminine) response to His Word, the perfect disciple, the Bride par excellence, creation’s embodiment of Wisdom, and the mother of all those called to be disciples with her.”
It is not only women disciples who must become the bride of Christ (as Clare teaches Agnes), but the souls of Christian men seeking union with Christ must also become suitable brides. I think this may be harder for men to identify with, but it is an essential point to grasp. The discovery should be liberating and help the pilgrim forward on his journey.
LikeLiked by 1 person
newenglandsun said:
I for one have not been having any difficulty embracing myself as the bride of Christ lately.
LikeLike
Dave Smith said:
I agree completely Gareth. We seem to be losing the understanding of Israel being both bride and spouse and Mary being both bride and spouse: though it has been taught for a long time. And the spiritual betrothal of the male mystic saints certainly were not unaware of their souls (the feminine aspect) being betrothed and why the Church is called the Bride of Christ though it contains both men and women.
LikeLiked by 1 person
newenglandsun said:
I’ve been reflecting on the Magnificat lately and it seems as if the Magnificat is very much Mary’s own statement about herself as it is her statement about the Church. If you’ll note how in Galatians, St Paul talks about those who believe are blessed in Abraham (Gal. 3:7-9). And in the Church, our “I” is very much a “we” in conjunction with the Church. So if Mary says “all shall call me blessed” her “me” is very much the “us” of the Church as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Smith said:
I think that is a fair statement as it would be a fair statement that it is quintessential call of every soul in Christ. Mary is a model for the Christian soul.
LikeLiked by 1 person
JessicaHof said:
Thank you dear friend – and I read the piece with much profit – so much there :)xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Smith said:
Glad you liked it Jess. I should have sent it to Geoffrey during our back and forth on Mary. 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
JessicaHof said:
I am sure he will see it. It is so good – getting a lot from it. I almost hesitate to put my Esther piece up – but it is my view, so I shall have a go 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 2 people
Dave Smith said:
I am sure there are many lessons that can be learned from the Book of Esther. Your’s may be a reading that is different but I’m sure that we will also find your reading of it to be useful and helpful as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
JessicaHof said:
I do hope so. It is one of those cases where the Catholic text is so clearly the right one- I love Esther’s prayer to God so much – so moving.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Smith said:
It is indeed a very moving prayer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
JessicaHof said:
I love it – and psychologically it makes so much sense to me 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Smith said:
I can see why you say so. 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gareth Thomas said:
I am looking forward to your Esther article now. What we are doing here seems to me quite exciting and it is all based on close attention to scripture. It is also patently an example of giving mutual spiritual support and fortification during the trials of Lent; while the world and its devil continue their assault on Christ, in redoubled strength in this time of our preparation for the Easter mysteries.
LikeLiked by 2 people
JessicaHof said:
That is very exciting – and it is so good to help each other like this – just what I hoped might happen here one day 🙂 xx
LikeLiked by 2 people