Tags
That Jesus founded a church no one but a fool could doubt; he said so himself. Indeed, I doubt any fool did doubt until men found it necessary to say to the church of their forefathers that they were no longer part of it. It should be noted that when men did that in history, they did not deny the need for a church, they simply denied that the church from which they had split was the true church; we see such rhetoric even now with regard to what has been happening in the Synod in Rome.
We forget, or at least I think we tend that way, that the church is an organism, not an organisation; it is the body of Christ. When we think of it as an organisation with rules and regulations, we get only part of why it exists; it exists because it was founded by Christ – it has been necessary for Christians in all times and in all places, because we are not simply embodied atomistic souls, we are children of the one God.
It is often noted here, not least by one contributor, that the Church seems full of sinners. He means, of course, the Roman Catholic Church, but he might as well say all of us, because we are the church and we are all sinners; we are not the more Godly because we go to church on a Sunday – though hopefully we are more Godly as a result of that. The Gospel of God is our common heritage: it is not Baptist, nor Roman nor Orthodox nor Anglican, and though all may sometimes have spoken as though it were, and although many will believe in their hearts it is theirs, it is ours.
The fruits of the Spirit are not pride and contention, they are love and understanding. The one Body grows. The Church is not, as some say, invisible, it is visible. But how we might ask, can it be so divided and disordered? What, I say, would you expect from a bunch of fallen sinners? Would you expect perfection? Seek it in the hereafter, and if we look at our own church, whatever it is, we shall see within it dissension and division so that even men who say ‘I am a Catholic’ will look at another and wonder how he can say it – and that is true of us all.
Baptism, the Eucharist and church elders are all parts of what we inherit from the Gospels and the Apostles, they speak to us of God’s redeeming love, and they tell us that human love can be made perfect only by the building up of the one body. We can, each of us, proceed only by the light and Grace gifted to us, but we can all try to discern how love can build us up. Two things alone are needed – love of God and love of neighbour: when we do that perfectly, then we shall see more clearly.
Dave Smith said:
Largely well done, my friend, as well as an interesting bit to think of, though for the Catholic, we might quibble a bit on your phrasing. The Church is both Visible and Spiritual (Invisible) not unlike the difference made between body and soul. Both comprise what it means to be alive in a human sense and spiritual sense as the Mystical Body of Christ.
CCC:
770 The Church is in history, but at the same time she transcends it. It is only “with the eyes of faith”183 that one can see her in her visible reality and at the same time in her spiritual reality as bearer of divine life.
The Church – both visible and spiritual
771 “The one mediator, Christ, established and ever sustains here on earth his holy Church, the community of faith, hope, and charity, as a visible organization through which he communicates truth and grace to all men.”184 The Church is at the same time:
– a “society structured with hierarchical organs and the mystical body of Christ;
– the visible society and the spiritual community;
– the earthly Church and the Church endowed with heavenly riches.”185
These dimensions together constitute “one complex reality which comes together from a human and a divine element”:186
The Church is essentially both human and divine, visible but endowed with invisible realities, zealous in action and dedicated to contemplation, present in the world, but as a pilgrim, so constituted that in her the human is directed toward and subordinated to the divine, the visible to the invisible, action to contemplation, and this present world to that city yet to come, the object of our quest.187 (187 SC 2; cf. Heb 13:14.)
O humility! O sublimity! Both tabernacle of cedar and sanctuary of God; earthly dwelling and celestial palace; house of clay and royal hall; body of death and temple of light; and at last both object of scorn to the proud and bride of Christ! She is black but beautiful, O daughters of Jerusalem, for even if the labor and pain of her long exile may have discolored her, yet heaven’s beauty has adorned her.188 (188 St. Bernard of Clairvaux, In Cant. Sermo 27:14:PL 183:920D.)
779 The Church is both visible and spiritual, a hierarchical society and the Mystical Body of Christ. She is one, yet formed of two components, human and divine. That is her mystery, which only faith can accept.
I would add that in order to fulfill the love of God and the love of neighbor that much more is contained in the word ‘love’ than we normally attribute to it in our most human ways of thinking. For instance, to say we love our fathers yet defy and hurt him would not qualify very well as fulfilling the commandment. Nor would it qualify if we were to benumb the conscience of a fellow human soul who is lost in sin . . . all under the guise of ‘loving’ them. Love includes not only looking at ourselves critically but also of informing others of what is seriously sinful for them as well; especially if they are unaware of such. For the abstinence of sin is a gift of grace that we have been given in order to overcome evil and we need not selfishly apply it only to ourselves whilst leaving our neighbors to die in theirs. There is no love in that. So from our own, regrettably different perspectives in this broken and divided body, we each must operate as best we can to live according as to our best understanding which is hopefully augmented by the working of the Holy Spirit within our, oft, stoney hearts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Geoffrey RS Sales said:
I don’t disagree at all. I was getting at the Protestant idea that the earthly church is invisible 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Smith said:
I thought that the case . . . just keeping both ideas alive as a unity. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Geoffrey RS Sales said:
Quite right to do so – sometimes one gets so into a certain mindset that one forgets that it isn’t the only one!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dave Smith said:
Amen to that, Geoffrey . . . I also fall into the same mindset often enough!
LikeLiked by 1 person