Tags
“Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ” (2 Cor. 10:5)
We find ourselves at war in this life: constantly we are bombarded with choices for our thoughts and our actions, and we must unlearn much to walk in the Light, as the Apostle John instructed us. This post begins a series on falsehoods that circulate the earth, propagated by man and demon alike, to ensnare and befuddle.
“Existence is suffering.” This Buddhist precept is at the root of much nihilism that ensnares man’s thoughts and emotions. But it is a LIE. Existence qua existence is not stained irrevocably with suffering. This fallacy conflates man’s current, post-lapsarian state with his original being as purposed and created by God Almighty. History is not a cycle of unrelieved misery. History has a beginning and an end: she is compassed roundabout by Eternity, whose circle no man may escape, for “He has put eternity in their heart” (Eccl. 3:11). The glory that awaits us after the Resurrection is beyond imagination, but this we know, for He who promised is faithful: “He will wipe away every tear from their eyes” (Rev. 21:4). Even in this life, stained as it is by evil, it is a fallacy to think that it is better not to exist than to exist in a state of good mixed with evil. This kind of thinking places man above his Creator in asking for non-existence instead of existence. We know what S. Paul has to say about that – stern words. Yes, and of course, in the post-Edenic world suffering is part of the lot of man, but it is from that road to eternal death we are saved by the sacrifice of the Lamb.
Christ is the dividing-line, so wonderfully captured by the Orthodox Cross, which marks one crucified criminal going down to Hell, and the Penitent Thief going up to Paradise with Jesus. “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.” (Matt. 10:34-36, KJV) The true Christ marks Christianity out among the world’s religions, philosophies, and idols. In the absence of Christ, even one of the best attempts to construct a purpose for life, Buddhism offers at best a somewhat bleak vision in which we are born again and again to suffer until we attain nothingness. In a world without Love, without Comfort, without Forgiveness – in short without God’s true Life – what is to stop man from devaluing himself and sending his race down to the Pit? This is the logical consequence of such beliefs and philosophy. The Gospel message doesn’t deny suffering, but transfigures it: “Behold the Man!” Only in the Cross is the true meaning and purpose of suffering to be found – and there evil is defeated, once and for all.
“True for you, but not for me.” Moral relativism is a great evil that bears much poisonous fruit in the West, where it seems to have been accepted as axiomatic by the masses – and for that reason they perish. In truth, it is a scheme of darkness designed to hide man’s sin and rob God of His right to judge and of His glory as the Saviour of mankind. It is an attack upon Christ – whom God the Father has appointed to judge the human race on the Last Day (Acts 17:31). “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” (Is. 5:20, KJV) Christ is quite blunt about the matter: “men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil” (Jn. 3:19, KJV). I would strongly recommend Paul Copan’s book, True for You, But not for Me, which provides a good philosophical rebuttal/refutation for this challenge.
We, who have been redeemed at such a price, are not called to condemn our fellow sinners; we are neither the Unmerciful servant nor yet the elder son in the parable of the Prodigal. But neither is our vocation to call what is sin by another name, nor is it to acquiesce in manifest evil. The Tempter constantly offers us excuses for our sins, and it is so easy to slip into that way of things; but it is the broad path to destruction. When Pope Francis said “Who am I to judge?” the world read him as it would – through its own preoccupations. Supporters of the dictatorship of relativism rejoiced and claimed the Pope for their own – a process aided by the furore among some Catholics who should have known better. To the censorious, Pope Francis was preaching amendment of heart; in a world where too often Christians sound harsh and judgmental, he was reminding us about that; but he was not calling sin by any other name. The reminder was of the Catholic teaching that it is the sin, not the sinner, we condemn; those who find that hard are those who most need to meditate on the Grace they have received whilst still a sinner.
“I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life. No man comes to the Father, except by Me.” (Jn. 14:6) Christ’s words about Himself admit no manipulation, no “alternative interpretation.” You either accept them and live, or deny them and die. As QVO puts it, tertium non datur. It’s important to remind ourselves of this fact from time to time. God has called us, like Peter, to be “fishers of men” – each man according to the gift that he has been given. In contending for the one and only Truth, we are contending for life. A world where anything is permissible is a world of chaos, the yawning void. This is the world in which the innocent are murdered within their mothers’ wombs, the workman is deprived of his just wages, and the unrepentant criminal set free to murder, corrupt, and steal. From such a world death seems like a wondrous escape – and on this road many of the righteous have fared to a better Realm.
To be continued.
And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.” (Matt. 10:34-36, KJV)
Do you think it possible that the household may also be a metaphor for struggling internally with the evils and misunderstandings of our own hearts as we struggle from the bonds of original sin?
LikeLike
Great question, Carl. In short, yes, and I would cite passages from Paul to support that idea as well as ones from Proverbs and Jeremiah’s ever-famous, “the heart is deceitful above all things”.
The struggles of my own heart represent one of the reasons for beginning this series, which C is collaborating with me on. My own engagement with Buddhism began with the The Simpsons, of all things, but in recent years I have begun to consider more what precepts motivate my perception of the world and the emotions that come asa response to that perception.
LikeLike
Yes, I think that is likely Carl. Though we are risen with him, we struggle still with the effects of Original Sin, and we need all the help we can get.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In terms of calling sin what it is, Nick draws the fine, but necessary line. We are not called to condemn others for sins to which we are not prone, and no more than we would welcome ourselves being condemned for the sins to which we are prone. We must be mindful that God loves us, and loved us when we were unregenerate sinners. Regeneration and rejection of sin is not to be had by condemnation; those who believed it better to burn a sinner than to let him or her live in their sins are, no doubt, answering for that judgment.
Only through feeling the love of God and knowing it can we become regenerate. I am most mistrustful of the notion that anyone can be frightened into the love of God save, perhaps, by the force of their conscience. Fear can produce obedience under threat, but that is not what we were offered by God, and that being so, we should not offer it to others.
All that said, how then do we deal with persistent and unrepentant sinners? Perhaps after we have tried loving them because they, too are sinners made in the image of God, we may need to look for other answers – but have we tried that, and have they felt from us that love? Or have they received from us harsh language and our judgment on their sins whilst, to their eyes, we neglect our own sins? Just a thought.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This really is a most excellent comment, and actually captures well something I have been struggling with a great deal over the years. John says, “Perfect love casts out all fear”. That is a principle I find myself reaching for in my walk with God: I have had occasional flashes of it, but they are easily lost the moment one listens to nasty preaching.
I am a great fan of the notion that one cannot help people who don’t want to be helped. In my personal opinion, I think the better course is to pray for the Holy Spirit to convict people and pray that He will raise up, empower, and guide ministers to help said person, be they prayer counsellors, priests, psychotherapists, or “accountability partners.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do think that has to be the best course Nick. Servus and I were discussing, with Steve, just this issue. I do not think that minds and hearts were ever won by calling someone a name they will find hurtful; calling it ‘tough love’ seems, to them, to add injury to insult. The best we can do is to live our faith so that others will think that that is the thing to do and to be.
I heard a man on Radio 4 this morning who had spent 30 years on ‘Death Row’ in America for a murder he did not commit, and he simply said that as a Christian, he forgave and prayed for those who had wronged him. His lawyer, who was also interviewed, went on about getting ‘compensation’, but the man himself won my heart by the Christian nature of his comments. He wanted no more, he said, than to be of service to his fellow men and women and to witness to the Lord. Well, I can tell him he did that in spades/
LikeLiked by 1 person
That sounds good, and chimes with my own experience. I can tell you that with particular issues I struggle with, no amount of fear mongering from Christians I know has produced long-lasting victory for me – only sleepless nights of self-loathing, which is not helpful. I see victory coming about by talking to qualified people and learning to walk in the love of God.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can only agree. We are not told that on the day of Pentecost Peter stood there and called those present pagans or unbelievers or ‘the damned’ – he called them to the Good News that through Christ they were redeemed.
Have we tried that often enough of late to be convinced that what worked for Peter will not work for us?
LikeLike
Sobering thoughts. I’m trying to think of the last time I gave a simple Gospel presentation along the lines: “Christ died for our sins and rose again, will you have Him?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
I have certainly never heard that approach adopted – outside of some good street preachers I know – and oddly, or not, it seems to work, at least sometimes, for them. We may have think to learn from others 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think we also may not be giving enough credit to peer pressure within society. This moral peer pressure has been under attack for a long time and has now all but evaporated from modern society. How many souls did it stop from committing regrettable acts and how many were brought to repentance by living in such a society is hard to gauge with any certainty – but we all know, who are old enough, that it played some significance in our lives and probably kept me out of jail or much worse.
When we are engaged in a battle for developing a code of honor and moral behavior against those who are battling and winning these fights to dismantle such common beliefs (which were held largely by everyone, Christian, Jew and non-believers) we have put ourselves back into the arena of Peter’s day before he won the hearts and minds of the majority and fashioned a Christian ethic among men.
If we want to turn back the clocks to living in a valueless society and preaching Jesus and the Good News to pagans who will likely behead us, isolate us, deride and revile us, then we can let them keep pushing and give up the gains we made over 2000 years without taking a stance – basically thinking that we will be able to do what Peter and his followers did and by shedding our blood as did the martyrs of old. But it took a Constantine to stop that blood-letting. I for one, do not want to toss away the gains and repeat the early sufferings of the Church once again. And I don’t want to avoid it by giving in to the political and sociological ideologies and beliefs which seem to relish nothing short of licentiousness and a desire to eliminate the conscience of the world which used to be the Christian faith. We are fading fast and if you want to await the inevitable by singing Christian hymns and forgiving those who feed yo to the lions to roars of laughter and elation then we didn’t deserve the fruits of those who won this freedom through the ages.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’ve a point but, I’ll warrant that you were raised, as I was, to know that “everybody is doing it” is never an excuse. My folks standard answer was, “if everybody is jumping off a bridge, are you going to also?” One can only be responsible for oneself, and it behooves us to be an example, not to make one.
If we’ve raised a generation or three without this insight, and without the education to figure it out, then we are in for a hard time, but I think many will figure it out as they grow up (finally).
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wish I had your optimism. That is precisely what is missing. They no longer say if “everybody is doing it” is not an excuse. They are saying that the polls say that most people think that there is nothing wrong with x, y, or z. Therefore, we shouldn’t judge. That leaves a child without any guidance at all. They can judge . . . though they have never heard an argument that contradicted the agenda being pushed in politics and in our schools.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately as you’ll find in my later comments, I share your pessimism. I don’t think it my place to jusge (amongst consenting adults) but neither do I think it my problem to pay for their mistakes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s the young who are really going to pay the price, I’m afraid. I may still lose my head at the shoulders by some madman but I had a rather decent life and was able to tap into the moral lessons I was taught at home, in school, by neighbors, and even echoed to some extent in the news and in hollywood. We were formed to emulate the heroes in life. It made the teachings of the Church come alive and so our full conscience was formed there where these things were given meat to flesh out the skeletons we were given by the rest of society. Character is something being lost. Even our military men and the academies have had scandals for cheating on tests and all sorts of other things: tail hook comes to mind.
LikeLike
I don’t disagree with a word you write (I seldom do) but it amounts to something I myself do – hark back and wish the times were not so evil. The difficulty is that they have become so, and we are not going to win by urging the youth of today to be more like our parents were. You are right about the peer pressure, and that is the only way forward, which is to work with those youth groups in churches who do see the evils of the slavery of sin and the empty promises of ‘freedom’ as simply license. Now how we do that, I can’t say, but on my local patch, it isn’t too hard – they are very active.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actually, I only use my youth to show you that it is still within living memory. The reason for harkening back is that we, like the historian you are, and many sociologists someday, will need to evaluate the myriad of things that we did wrong that brought us to this point. Obviously, we are only speaking of a few in this post. But it is important to see how society, our leaders, our churches all interact and impact the youth and the type of character development takes place in them as they reach maturity. From my point of view, we have had two generations that have suffered during this slide to the bottom and each one is getting progressively worse. I shudder to think what the next might be like. It must be faced straight on and confronted not coddled and reasoned with. Is it too late given the state of society? I do not know anymore. It may just have to rot, turn into anarchy and slavery to sin and to corruption and to Marxist ideologies before there is a revolt that sparks a new fire under the Church and the teachings that have served good mea and women for many years. It will rise from the ashes: but when will the conflagration happen and does it have to happen?
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have, like the children of Israel, erred and strayed from his ways like lost sheep, and however much we may say we are surprised, we should not be when sin has its inevitable effect. There are some Fathers who believed that sin was its own condemnation – a living hell – and for many who fall into its clutches, that is the case.
It may be that this will be an example that at least some among the young will decide not to copy. I see many signs this generation is far less liberal on some matters than its predecessor.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aye, it is misnomer to call homosexual’s gay. They seem to be the most likely to be medicated for bipolar and other forms of depression. In fact most of our populations, due to our wallowing in sins, is self-medicating or on some form of anti-depressants. I think that says a lot.
LikeLike
And, of course, increasingly, people are realising the drugs aren’t the answer, and that psychiatrists can drain you of money for life. That is why it is important that when they look around for what will help them, they are not put off looking at us. We cannot be the elder brother to the prodigals – even if, and here I speak only for me, that is the temptation.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would agree if that Church were preaching the teachings of the Church as she has for 2000 years . . . publicly, privately, and often.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is a big part of the problem. The analysts fail, sex addiction and drug addiction and alcohol all fail – and when they get to that realisation, it is important there should be no barriers to them thinking that we might be the better way – not least because we are 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed so . . . where is the voice of the Church showing the better way?
LikeLiked by 1 person
We should be there living the example.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sadly, nothing speaks louder than a Pope, a Bishop or a Priest. I have found that out the hard way. I have taught from he Catechism and corrected by my students as to what Fr. so-and-so said. We are merely fanatics to these people . . . but we must try . . . and trod on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nor do i disagree, and would add that at least where I grew up peer pressure was counteracted by the entire community acting as parents. One got away with very little because the entire town was paying attention. That seems to be something we’ve lost and it’s worse because while our parents were wise enough to believe the worst of us, many modern ones seem not to be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, it was so much easier in a time where the entire neighborhood (at least externally) embraced the same public morality and sense of responsibility for the children: anybody’s children.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was, that was then this is now and we shall have to do it the hard way again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not sure, this country has a record of ever doing that . . . Christianity has its instances but it took many, many years to overcome each instance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And again I am reminded of Napoleon, riding along a road in northern France one summer, commenting to his aide that they needed to plant trees to shade the soldiers. The aide protested that it would take twenty years for the trees to be useful. to which Napoleon replied, “Yes, so we must start immediately.”
In truth that is what our revolution was, in large part, putting things back in proper order, as has been said, “The good old law.” We have the history, and the means, in both church and state, the question is, do we have the will.?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not at the present, I fear.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I fear that as well, but it is better to die advancing the cause than cowering in the trench.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agree as well. Though I wonder about my resolve when they start slicing off heads in front of me . . . knowing my turn will only be a minute or two away.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So do we all, I think. I guess the answer to that is not to be taken. Kipling(and the US Cavalry) both recommend saving the last bullet for yourself. Somebody (likely Newman) said our bravery will be in proportion to our Faith. Hopefully we’ll not find out.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aye, it is easy to profess faith and yet many fail the final exam.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aye, and we’ll not know until the test. We’re soft, but we don’t kid ourselves that we aren’t, so maybe we’re as prepared as possible.
LikeLike
Pray the Holy Spirit will fill us with His Grace at the very moment should it ever arrive.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed so, my friend. And pray to die in your sleep, unlike the passengers in the car. 🙂
LikeLike
Actually, the Catholic version of the ‘happy’ death is one where you are aware of your death and have time to make a good confession and hopefully come to terms with the transformation from this mortal life to a new eternal life in beatitude. We pray for helps to persevere through our final agony as this is the devil’s last chance to snatch from your soul from the hand of God. So we pray for a “happy” death, indeed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not all that different of course.
i was referring to the old joke about grandpa dying in his sleep, unlike the passengers in his car who were all screaming. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry. I hadn’t heard that one – but a good joke. Must be mid-western one.
LikeLike
I heard a bit about that (although not the interview), and it’s not all that uncommon, for that matter. It’s hard not to feel that someone owes him something for thirty years of his life wasted, and yet, presuming everybody acted in good faith, which is usually the case, it’s difficult to say who, exactly owes him anything beyond his freedom and a second chance.
One of those places where hard cases make bad law, I think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
From the sound of it, someone had been behaving in very bad faith, but who knows? What struck me was the utter lack of bitterness in the man himself – whether he knew it or not, that was a testimony to the love of Jesus stronger than that in many a sermon.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That too happens, and may well be true in this case. if so the bad actor should pay a penalty but I’m not sure a civil action is the appropriate response. Nor am I sure it’s not, in all fairness.
That is something I’ve seen occasionally, those who bore the most adverse consequences often seem the most unmarked. A most remarkable manifestation of Grace, i think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, Neo.
LikeLiked by 1 person
🙂
LikeLike
The rigid and the self-assured could not have helped the Prodigal Son, and they cannot help us, even if we admire them, because their actions are warmed by very little love.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In a way they did. Had he not fallen into bad times and suffering while remembering how well things were at home and watching the rigid masters he worked for living well were what drove him back to his father. Had he been accepted, given charity by all, would he have returned to his father. It is like Bishop Sheen always said: ‘Sometimes, God must break hearts before he can enter them.”
LikeLike
“Had he been accepted, given charity by all, would he have returned to his father.”
Idk, but I do know that the only thing that helped him was forgiveness and love. Perhaps, if he would have found forgiveness and love sooner, he would have understood that he didn’t have to go home to his father, for his Father was already with him. He just need open his eyes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is a well known fact that with many people it is at their lowest point, almost to the point of despair, that opens our hearts to God. Everything is wonderful while we are out sinning without any regret or second thought. Do you really think he would have returned to his father asking forgiveness had he not fallen and thought back about how well even the lowest servant in his fathers house had it better than he?
LikeLike
That’s a very good observation. 1 Cor. 13 comes to mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent thread and I’ll be paying attention to replies.
My current “favorite” falsehood is this: “It’s all good”….one religion is as good as any other as long as it makes you happy. God bless. Ginnyfree.
LikeLike
Indeed – somewhere along the line we seem to have exchanged objective Truth for subjective experience.
LikeLike
Nicholas, I am not even sure anymore whether we are in a war of ideas anymore. It seems more a war between unfettered passions and restraint, lawlessness and those who adhere to a standard. It is the non-judgmentalism of any act versus the adherence of time honored institutions for the family and the good of society. It transcends religion and politics and is taking on an air of deep hostility to those who will not give an thumbs up or wink and an nod to the most heinous actions of others. Anarchy soon follows and we are seeing before our eyes the corruption but legally and morally of ancient Rome. The self-absorption of the masses and the absolute loathing of those who would try to convince their conscience of anything different. In such a situation, the world hates Christ when He condemns their actions and even worse, when some men of liberal attitudes for the licentious actions of others, do nothing and remain silent, they project total indifference. Reminds me of the lukewarm whom are vomited from the mouth of God.
LikeLike
Lawlessness is a very good choice of word and implies even more than what we think in Greek – it can mean anarchy and chaos of the very worst philosophical and practical kind. Paul and Christ predicted this of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed, it is coming to pass once again in human history. We have fought against such in every century somewhere and I wonder if this new Western World view will step up to the challenge: or what it will take to get them to do that.
LikeLike
i think we are no longer in a war of ideas. I quoted Rick Wilson from “The Federalist” this morning. He says,
“As with immigration, race, abortion, guns, income inequality, and a host of other topics, I’m reminded that gay marriage and religious liberty questions will never be resolved in the eyes of liberals. A large segment of the Left wants their vote-driver issues to never, ever be in the rear-view. There is no shining city ahead for them, just an endless arena of raw, almost inchoate rage and complaint. Their entire model is predicated on the creation and maintenance of grievance demographics, and the latest flavor is the hypothetical oppression of gay couples in contrived scenarios in tiny Indiana pizza shops. Oh, this one will fade soon, but the sense that these fights are getting louder, and uglier, is troubling.”
I think he’s right, and I foresee dire consequences from it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that in many cases, we’ve gone beyond the “ideas” stage. But I also feel that we must continue to be a “light on a hill” not just by our actions but by our ideas and reason – “Come, let us reason together.” There are loads of people out there who can be described as “searching” – for them we must provide the resources to help make an informed decision. For our own part, we also need to be at war with our own false notions, which brings me back to the verse at the top of this post and Carl’s question, which was the first one. Unless any of us thinks he has arrived, each of us must attend to the weeds in his own heart and mind. Certainly this is how I feel…we don’t suddenly get an orthodoxy download with all our heresy sent to the recycling bin – life doesn’t work that way.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, and i would think all here do, that is the reason we are here, to BE an example, and to spread the word. There are many who search, and we must find ways to guide them but most of all, ourselves. Carl’s question, which was the first is indeed the key, i think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Agreed, my friend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
But as Nicholas reminds us, not foreordained. Yet, anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That is the present-day faux liberalism embodied in figures like Obama and Clinton, which is terribly popular on the Left. Of course that is NOT how traditional liberalism functioned (or functions).
LikeLiked by 1 person
True. The article, and mine as well is focused on the fracas in Indiana.
LikeLiked by 1 person