We have all heard so many times that “God is Love”, and so he is. It’s been talked enough about here, and everywhere else, that it has become in the popular mind all that God is. Sort of your wingman who will accept anything you want to do. Which leaves us with the question , “Is that all there is?” The answer, of course is no. If it were he would be of little value to us as a guide.
But we know that is not the case, the entire structure of western civilization is built on the Christian faith (and it’s older counterpart, Judaism). This is where our moral code, our sense of right and wrong, and even what honor we have come from. Even militant atheists use our terms to argue against our God.
Early in his Papacy Benedict XVI gave a speech to the scientists at Regensburg. Likely you remember it because in it he quoted Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus, likely from perhaps winter barracks in 1391, on the difference between the Islamic God and ours. the emperor spoke rather forcefully, as befits one whose empire and its capital would soon be besieged, and eventually lost.The press predictably, blew this up into an indictment of Benedict, and others, like Dr. Luther who held similar views. personally I think we might have something to learn from those who fought what is increasingly looking like an enemy again. But that was a minor part of what he said that day, other things were, I think, more important.
Because that day, he also spoke of a rational God. using John 1:1
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
But the new Testament was written in Greek, and the word John used was Logos, which does translate as word but, it also translates as reason. And so our God is a God of Reason as well as Love.
I’m nobody’s idea of a theologian so, let’s let Benedict (who is) speak to us
John thus spoke the final word on the biblical concept of God, and in this word all the often toilsome and tortuous threads of biblical faith find their culmination and synthesis. In the beginning was the logos, and the logos is God, says the Evangelist. The encounter between the Biblical message and Greek thought did not happen by chance. The vision of Saint Paul, who saw the roads to Asia barred and in a dream saw a Macedonian man plead with him: “Come over to Macedonia and help us!” (cf. Acts 16:6-10) – this vision can be interpreted as a “distillation” of the intrinsic necessity of a rapprochement between Biblical faith and Greek inquiry.
In point of fact, this rapprochement had been going on for some time. The mysterious name of God, revealed from the burning bush, a name which separates this God from all other divinities with their many names and simply asserts being, “I am”, already presents a challenge to the notion of myth, to which Socrates’ attempt to vanquish and transcend myth stands in close analogy.
And thus we see even before Christ, the approaching rapprochement between Greek civilization and our God
In truth,immediately there was little resistance to Greek ideas and rationalism in Christianity, Chalcedon has commented how pervasive Greek culture was in Israel at the time of Christ, and once it was decided to evangelize the gentiles, it pretty much disappeared. And thus, almost from the beginning (n fact, the Septuagint itself was in Greek.
Benedict says this in relation to this:
This inner rapprochement between Biblical faith and Greek philosophical inquiry was an event of decisive importance not only from the standpoint of the history of religions, but also from that of world history – it is an event which concerns us even today. Given this convergence, it is not surprising that Christianity, despite its origins and some significant developments in the East, finally took on its historically decisive character in Europe. We can also express this the other way around: this convergence, with the subsequent addition of the Roman heritage, created Europe and remains the foundation of what can rightly be called Europe.
I think that is exactly correct, and thus we see from the time of the Apostles themselves Christianity has learned from those others around us, adopting the wheat and discarding the chaff, as we come to an ever closer understanding of God.
All quotations are from Benedict’s address which can be found here, and we will continue soon
I started down this road by reading an excellent article called Catholic Scot: Why Be Moral?. You should as well.
Yes, as you gave examples, there is a lot of talk about love and a great deal of it is wrong-headed. If you would have in interest to look at this book and consider a review, I would be glad to send the pdf. https://textsincontext.wordpress.com/2014/03/16/love-basics-heresies-divorce-homosexuality-church/
LikeLike
Hello NEO. Nice essay. You’ve put some time into your homework! You get a little gold star for the top and can be first in line for the milk and cookies today and first out the door for recess! God is Love. God is Justice. God is Mercy. God is Goodness. God is. There are 14 total attributes of God and each helps us understand better the whole of Him. But this knowledge only goes so far when it comes from the letters on a page. The real understanding has to come from the heart and what God has placed there by Himself and communed with by the sinner and that is the specific Way in which God wants that particular person to come to know Him, so as to Love Him as He would be loved and then perhaps to actually serve Him in this life……blah blah blah. You know the rest. We get to know Him better by heart than by head. Some tend to point to one or two of the Divine Attributes and confine God to being that and only that and thus begin to re-create God in their own image. This happens often with “God is Love” and is very popular these days and God acting in anyway that isn’t seen as loving by these types has become impossible. So when you mention Hell as serving God’s justice, they get really up tight and begin the place one of the 14 attributes over the others and insist it is the governing attribute! NONSENSE. They are a harmonious whole and the whole them is contained in Jesus Christ and all He wants you to know of Him He places inside you each time you receive Him in the Eucharist! DUH. No kidding. Okie dokie. Enough Mom lectures for young theologians. Very nice work NEO. Keep it up. God bless. Ginnyfree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good points there, Ginny. When we overemphasize one of God’ attributes (most commonly done with Love) and done so to attempt to de emphasize God’s Judgement, well, I’m inclined to think you might have need to de emphasize God’s judgement. But, that does not mean God agrees with you!
LikeLike
Agreement…………..why is that so sought after? Who needs it and why? Am I unsure of what I have read on a page or what the Church has taught me? Or am I trying to ride my bicycle for the first time without the training wheels and need Dad’s hand still till I get down to end of the lane? Thinking for one’s self truly ends when one put’s on the mind of Christ. But prudence reminds us that not all our thoughts come from God and they aren’t. Could be another reason we need each others approval. Fear of thinking in a wrong direction. Fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom but don’t let it become the training wheels you discard and leave behind when you grow up. God bless. Ginnyfree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lot of tha around, isn’t there? So many people are simply afraid to think, and yet that is the thing that makes us, so to speak, Godlike. he ability to reason, to discern the truth, for ourselves, even if it is unpopular. God guides us yes, usually gently, to make the right choices, but He leaves it up to us to do so, or not.
LikeLike
P.S. It really is wonderful when you find your own heart inside the writings of another and how much more wonderful when the heart that beats in a kindred way to one’s own is a great son of the Church! My own heart beats with the words of some others. Benedict XVI’s writings are nice, but I find my own heart beating easier with the aid of some others. God bless. Ginnyfree.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And i think that’s fair, and likely why God gives us so many to read and study, this series is the most I’ve done with Benedict, and he speaks forcefully to me, especially with his explanations of how we got to where we are.
LikeLike
I am more used to seeing reason paired with faith but this was a good exercise in thinking and it opens up avenues of many thoughts (and future posts?), such for starters might be these????
FAITH / REASON
belief vs. unbelief: a reason for living (reason serves faith)
HOPE / RIGHT DESIRE / LIVING UP TO A GOAL (END FOR WHICH WE WERE MADE)
permanence vs. change: an end to our toil (teleological ends and desires serve hope)
LOVE / MERCY / JUSTICE
lasting reward vs. nothingness: meaning to what otherwise is meaningless (mercy and justice serve love)
ONE / TRUE / GOOD / BEAUTIFUL
wholeness vs. divisiveness and order vs. chaos: attributes that serve to point man to God
SELF GIVING / SELF DENIAL
the ends vs. the means: good ends must start with good means (self-denial serves self-giving)
JOY / PEACE / FREEDOM
rest in the transient vs. rest in the everlasting: brings joy of freedom from dis-order and dis-ease (my will is Thy Will)
EVERLASTING / EVERPRESENT / ALL-KNOWING / ALL-POWERFUL
a higher authority vs. the final authority: an end to equivocation, denial, and excuses
SPIRIT / LAW
the heart of our transcendence in Christ vs. the practical steps taken to achieve this: the law serves the spirit as the alphabet serves the word and the word the sentence and the sentence the book.
That’s just for starters, of course. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, for me as well, it opens up a whole range of things to write/think about/ponder. I think Benedict would have been/was a wonderful teacher. he makes you think.
LikeLiked by 1 person
One of my favorites, as you know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do know that, and I am seeing why. And exceptional man, of whose work I will be reading more.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For contemporaries, I doubt you will find much better.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree, I love JP II as you know but, he was a leader more than a teacher, I think. Other than that Bonhoeffer mostly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Might I suggest these two which predate the other two by just a smidgen as time goes?
Dietrich von Hildebrand and Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange.
They are magnificent as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll put ’em on the list but, fair warning, I’m plowing through the early Father so it may be a while. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, if you need a break by reading contemporary language and thoughts which emanate from the fathers you might find them a good relief to the tedium.
LikeLiked by 1 person
True, I’m also reading Thomas Merton, which is fascinating, and some guy writing about Chamberlain and Churchill, and he doesn’t buy the normal hagiography, which is refreshing. 🙂
LikeLike
For Bosco, God is Mary.
LikeLike
…and many more idiocies. But don’t expect him around here: he definitely doesn’t do reason -or intelligence, or reading…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I would also add that he isn’t even a Christian–in any meaningful sense of the word. He has not love. He’s not even pre-Christian. If he had love and wasn’t baptized, he’d be pre-Christian. He doesn’t have either and he disgraces the sacraments every chance he gets.
LikeLike
Pingback: Back Into the Wasteland | nebraskaenergyobserver
Pingback: God is Reason: Part Two | All Along the Watchtower