Sometimes I am tempted to wonder whether there is any aspect of our faith which Benedict XVI has not illuminated to our benefit. This reflection on the Blessed Trinity and the Eucharist comes from his 2007 Post-Synodical Exhortation, Sacramentum Caritatis, the whole of which is well worth reading. I offer these reflections for today’s Solemnity.
7. The first element of eucharistic faith is the mystery of God himself, trinitarian love. In Jesus’ dialogue with Nicodemus, we find an illuminating expression in this regard: “God so loved the world that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life. For God sent the Son into the world, not to condemn the world, but that the world might be saved through him” (Jn 3:16-17). These words show the deepest source of God’s gift. In the Eucharist Jesus does not give us a “thing,” but himself; he offers his own body and pours out his own blood. He thus gives us the totality of his life and reveals the ultimate origin of this love. He is the eternal Son, given to us by the Father. In the Gospel we hear how Jesus, after feeding the crowds by multiplying the loaves and fishes, says to those who had followed him to the synagogue of Capernaum: “My Father gives you the true bread from heaven; for the bread of God is he who comes down from heaven, and gives life to the world” (Jn 6:32-33), and even identifies himself, his own flesh and blood, with that bread: “I am the living bread which came down from heaven; if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I shall give for the life of the world is my flesh” (Jn 6:51). Jesus thus shows that he is the bread of life which the eternal Father gives to mankind.
A free gift of the Blessed Trinity
8. The Eucharist reveals the loving plan that guides all of salvation history (cf. Eph 1:10; 3:8- 11). There the Deus Trinitas, who is essentially love (cf. 1 Jn 4:7-8), becomes fully a part of our human condition. In the bread and wine under whose appearances Christ gives himself to us in the paschal meal (cf. Lk 22:14-20; 1 Cor 11:23-26), God’s whole life encounters us and is sacramentally shared with us. God is a perfect communion of love between Father, Son and Holy Spirit. At creation itself, man was called to have some share in God’s breath of life (cf. Gen 2:7). But it is in Christ, dead and risen, and in the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, given without measure (cf. Jn 3:34), that we have become sharers of God’s inmost life. Jesus Christ, who “through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God” (Heb 9:14), makes us, in the gift of the Eucharist, sharers in God’s own life. This is an absolutely free gift, the superabundant fulfilment of God’s promises. The Church receives, celebrates and adores this gift in faithful obedience. The “mystery of faith” is thus a mystery of trinitarian love, a mystery in which we are called by grace to participate. We too should therefore exclaim with Saint Augustine: “If you see love, you see the Trinity.”
Yes, indeed, where we see love, we see the workings of the Trinity. God is not an isolated, figure brooding over His creation, He is, as St John tells us, ‘love’. We encounter Him where we see love, and we do His work where we offer service through love. The foolishness of those who imagine that anyone believes in salvation through works is hard to understand, save in the sense that the great Enemy darkens the minds of men. If we are in Christ and He is in us, then just as the love of the Trinity overflows into creation, then our love for Him flows from us in the helping of others. Our humanity is redeemed through the Incarnation, and the Risen and Ascended Christ sanctifies our flesh. We shall be resurrected not as disembodied spirits, but in glorified bodies, like unto His body. Through the Eucharist we are sharers in His life now, whilst we are in this mortal realm. For this great gift, we give thanks and praise. To those who wonder what the Church means when it says that the fulness of the faith is here, this is the deep and true meaning.
C451
“To those who wonder what the Church means when it says that the fulness of the faith is here, this is the deep and true meaning.”
All of which of course is also held and believed by evangelical Christians.
LikeLike
Only if you believe that the Eucharist is, indeed, the body and blood of the Lord.
LikeLike
No sense me commenting on this one. Waste of time for both of us.
LikeLike
I love this C, and it brings to mind how, quite sadly, we are losing this sense of the holy within our own ranks. We consecrated (made holy) that which was to be used in service to the Eucharist (Jesus Christ in His special presence). We consecrated the Church, the altar, the priest and especially his hands, the ciborium and the chalice etc. All of these things were consecrated not only to sanctify that which would come into contact with Jesus in the Eucharist but also to set apart the sacred character and ministry of the consecrated priesthood from the ordinary royal priesthood of the laity.
Most egregious, in my mind, is the making of the laity into what is more commonly referred to as Eucharistic Ministers (which the Church distinguishes for good reason as Extraordinary Ministers) which confuses the symbolism of the ministerial difference. Simultaneously is the return to the reception of the Eucharist in the hand which has the effect of making us feel that our hands are no different than the consecrated hands of a priest (though his hands were specifically consecrated to be associated with the Consecration of all consecrations, the Body and Blood of Christ. We are blurring the distinctions between the priest and layman and we have seen the consequences of this in most parishes which have become increasingly banal and our priests more laicized than set apart by their consecration. The respect and dignity of the priest as well as the Eucharist is now what we have come to expect. At this rate, their will no longer need to be consecrations of anything in the Church anymore; for their doesn’t seem to be anything special about it and it counts for nothing.
I once again forced myself to leave Mass early today during communion as the choir broke out in a lively rendition of ‘He’s God the Whole World in His Hand.’ I could not pray after reception as I was transported back to my youth as this was a hootenanny favorite during my high school days. So banal and so disrespectful of those who were trying to get close to Jesus after receiving Him in the Blessed Sacrament and trying (as best we could) to let our prayers bring us to an increase in the graces of this most Holy Sacrament.
LikeLike
** That was supposed to be the song: “He’s Got the Whole World in His Hands”** Got as opposed to God. 🙂
LikeLike
Now the initial version made more sense 🙂
LikeLike
It would have, wouldn’t it? 🙂
LikeLike
I feel for you Servus and it gives me some insight into what is concerning you it would also be totally inappropriate for our communion.
LikeLike
I’m glad to hear that Rob. It seems to take the holy and profane it into the ordinary back-slapping that we might get at a party.
LikeLike
It is sad. I cannot think it wise to have, as my Church does, an EM who wears tight jeans and self-intincts; but the Priest ignores these things, as he did the fact that one of the EMs today was wearing shorts and a tee shirt.
We have suddenly adopted the fashion of having a hymn during communion, which I find distracting.
I cannot but think that something is very wrong.
LikeLike
As I do as well. We have the same dress problems as well. We have ET’s that distribute communion in shorts and tee shirts with, at times, some horrible things written on them. If we don’t get this train back on track soon, I think it will take some extraordinary actions to do so.
LikeLike
It really would be terribly simple. Turn up in decent clothes and behave with decorum. I am not against EMs, or rather, I accept them; but ours show no sign of realising the huge responsibility they have taken on. I have refused the training; I do not think a divorced man, even one with an annullment, is fit to that sacred job.
LikeLike
I hope you remember the Encyclical I sent to you considering such matters signed by no less than 7 of the Congregations which has been mostly ignored by our bishops and priests.
LikeLike
Here in Barbados the situation is reversed whatever the denomination everyone goes to church as well dressed as they possibly can. People refer to what they call ‘church clothes’ for which their best is kept, which is good. But unfortunately I have met some poor people who say they cannot go to church as they have not got any ‘church clothes’.
I’m sure the Lord and we all’ would be delighted with clean rags at our church in such circumstances; not to mention that we should be prepared to do something to help.
LikeLike
It was so in my childhood in a poor part of Cheshire. We had ‘Sunday best’ clothes which we worse on no other day.
LikeLike
Absolutely. We are visiting the King of kings. We wear the best we have. If we are poor, then God could never be offended as long as it is the best they have to honor Him while being in His presence.
LikeLike
Indeed; you were probably being ‘clothist’ 🙂
LikeLike
Yes, ‘clothist,’ ‘legalistic,’ ‘triumphalist,’ and was called ‘pharisaical’ at times. I guess I am in good company at the Vatican though since I took my cue from 8 (not 7) Congregations that signed on to that document.
LikeLike
I often wonder why they call in ‘common sense’ – it is exceedingly rare 🙂
LikeLike
Indeed it is. 🙂
LikeLike
Actually, I called it an encyclical it as an Instruction. If you don’t remember it – it is here:
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/laity/documents/rc_con_interdic_doc_15081997_en.html
This is what I use to form my conscience about such things.
LikeLike
Again a Freudian slip: ET and EM. I think they may actually be ET’s though.
LikeLike
I am pretty much convinced one of ours is ET.
LikeLike
I have a few that are in that mold as well.
LikeLike
God wants you to wear nice clothe when you go to hear the pedophile speak.
On a more serious note….Look at the above picture…..the guy has a big cross around his neck. All the catholic clergy, priests bishops popes and what have you, wear them A big ass cross. They wear them while sodomizing young boys. A big as cross. What does it mean? Its suppose to show the world how holy they are, when in fact they are the lowest of the dregs. Graven image suppliers. Come to their temples and they provide all the statues you can hope for, and a nice pillow for your knees to bow befor them.
LikeLike