Tags
So, if you are trying to get more acquainted with the Christian faith, where to start? Obviously the Bible, but let us stop there for a moment.
An inevitable concomitant of blogging about religion is that you encounter educated people who think that unlike any other important book, the Bible is instantly understandable in full to anyone who reads it. I don’t know how many of these people studied a literature-based subject, but if they did, they have less of an excuse than scientists, who perhaps cannot be expected to understand the need to study a text before it will yield up its treasures.
St. Cyril of Jerusalem’s Catechetical Lectures contains the advice not to let catechumens loose on the text of the Holy Scriptures until they have been properly taught; he understood what some modern, educated men don’t, which is that one cannot simply read and instantly understand. We might note, inter alia, that St. Cyril was assuming that men and women would come to the Scripture after they had first come to Christ, something which, in our text-saturated world, we might do well to bear in mind.
Although in modern times the notion that we are made gods, supported by John 1:12 is associated with the Mormons, their heresy partakes of a much older one, and it was that which St. Cyril was combating, explaining the proper and orthodox view of the passages from Psalms and St. Peter.
That is not, of course, to deny that if you want to, you can read 2 Peter 1:4 and Psalm 82:6 as meaning that we literally become gods; it to say that if you do that you deviate, indeed you depart, from orthodox Christianity. This is hard for some moderns, who believing all knowledge is relative, would argue that one interpretation is as good as another. Of course, they would not accept that in the sphere so many of them come from, science, and yet they feel it right to apply it to a sphere about which they often know very little, such as theology. No one can stop them, but if they realised how foolish it makes them look, they might stop themselves.
But were do they, or we, get orthodox catechesis? I wish I had it from a young age, but I didn’t. I was, however, fortunate to get it at University, and we used the Anchor Bible Commentaries, which were, and are still to me, a wonderful guide. The Collegeville commentaries I have also found most useful. A particular love of mine is the series Ancient Christian Commentary, which is full of the wisdom of the Fathers.
The Church of England has produced a marvellous ‘Pilgrim’ course for those interested in knowing more about Faith. The books are wonderfully accessible and come with helpful video resources. I wish we had had them when I was trying to learn more, as they are a great introduction. We have used the first six with our recent catechumens, and I am looking forward to the rest of them. If you haven’t come across them and want to know more, do visit the website – and I can say from experience that they are very useful stepping stones.
You point out what probably had me abandon Christianity from the start. I, like many, confuse the Bible with the Faith and think that it is synonymous as well as foundational to the Faith. Yet it is the Faith which exists in community within the Church that is basis for belief. The Bible is filled with articles of Faith and the history of the Christian community and their expressions of belief. Therefore, it becomes the oldest written documents about the Church and the Faith community and are essential; but, as always, within a context. Take away the context and you are left with literature than can be taken in a host of directions. In fact many Buddhists accepted Christ (based on the literature of the Bible) as another expression of Buddha and for their faith.
So best to find a holy and pious teacher who can lead you to the Church and to the understanding of the Bible in context with a faith community. Otherwise, I am afraid it is all so much mumbo jumbo. For without the Church I could not believe what is contained in the Bible nor should I be able to decide if it is holy scripture or simply writings and musings. How would I be able to declare that this religion is the true religion or if the Muslim or Buddhist religions are the true religions? Nowhere does the Bible tell us it is the Word of God and even if it did, why should I believe this anymore than an Isaac Asimov novel?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Good questions, dear friend, and without the Church, I do not know what answer I could give, either 🙂 xx
LikeLike
🙂 xx
LikeLike
I don’t think these issues generalize across people. Some people read scripture and recognize it as divinely inspired, without apparent external testimony, while others do what the Mormons encourage and pray to ask God whether it is inspired, and are told so. (Some people, of course, make analogous claims regarding other texts; last night I had a very long conversation with a friend who claimed to recognize the divine guidance in the works of Thomas Aquinas.) For some, the testimony of the community is essential; for others, it makes them suspect collusion. For Muslims in nearly entirely Muslim countries, if they become interested in Christianity, the Bible is one of the few texts available to them that they can find online (and that they know how to find, because they google the Arabic “injil”). I think the community is in general extraordinarily helpful (and was intended to be so, but like everything else, humans have managed to mess it up a bit), but that God meets people where they are, and then takes them to where they need to be, and he is not lacking in tools. So I don’t think this can be generalized.
LikeLike
Dont stop searching
LikeLike
That’s quite right, dear Bosco 🙂 x
LikeLike
I hadn’t come across the Pilgrim course before. It looks very interesting; I shall have to explore it more, as I have time. I’m glad to have it on my radar.
The Anchor Bible Commentaries are very uneven in their goals and starting assumptions, so I’m not sure how good they would be for orthodox catechesis. I also suspect that they are a bit heady for most Christians (judging from how many seminarians I knew found them to be a bit too heady!). The Ancient Christian Commentaries on Scripture are fascinating, but will strike most new believers as funny sounding names, and I do wish they had added more context to the various statements so that we could trace a history of ideas rather than a potpourri. (Perhaps they have done so since I last used the series, over a decade ago.) Though I’ve never made much use of them, the Matthew Henry commentaries are at least widely and freely available online, more practical, and more orthodox than Anchor (but never having read large portions, I don’t know how polemical they are). The NIV Application Commentary series will probably be somewhat less sectarian, still mostly orthodox, and generally pretty accessible (although no doubt too narrowly “evangelical” for some). But it takes a special bookishness (a high virtue in my book) to profit from reading biblical commentaries.
For reading resources, I enjoy the advice of C.S. Lewis that one should read two old books for every new, and I can highly recommend Irenaeus’ Proof of the Apostolic Preaching (only relatively recently reintroduced to the West from an Armenian version). Augustine’s Confessions challenges many people in useful ways, as does the Imitatio Christi by Thomas a Kempis, although the latter’s monastic orientation needs to be “translated” for laypeople. The seventeenth century produced at least two spiritual classics, John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress and Brother Lawrence’s The Practice of the Presence of God. I read C. S. Lewis’s own Mere Christianity with profit, even though his arguments about marriage strike most contemporaries as peculiar to his generation; I know that John Stott and, I think, N. T. Wright have written more recent attempts in the same direction, of which I have heard good things, but about which I cannot comment from experience. These are all books which challenge the young in the faith to learn more, and provide a basic framework for that learning.
But even so, I suspect that many if not most Christians will learn their Christian faith primarily by other means. Continued use of the sacraments is instructive, and sermons should be, as well as simply what Bonhoeffer termed “life together” in a local congregation, with all its embodied specific challenges and opportunities. “Doing something,” whether serving the needs of the broader society or being helpful around the church, is important for most people to learn. Close mentorship was critical for me, and I suspect helpful for many; I have heard that the practice of “spiritual direction” is increasing. And, of course, contemplation has its place. So there are many ways for people to learn more, and perhaps most importantly they need simply to be instructed that the Christian life is one of continually learning more.
LikeLike
Yes, and above all, one must purchase a JP II Penance Kit so as to whip ones self closer to God. Whip it, and whip it good. Oh yeah baby. Rosco, Oh Rosco, whip me harder, i can almost see god.. Yeah baby yeah
LikeLike
Bosco …. don’t do that, there’s a good man 🙂 xx
LikeLike
Thank you so much for some very interesting comments – as ever. One of the reasons I like the Pilgrim course is that there is nothing quite like it, and in practice, it is working very well, So far we only have the very basic parts of it, but I am looking forward to the next stage materials.
LikeLike
Pingback: Resources for Continuing Christian Education | Finite Reflections of Infinity