Tags
Hard to believe that we are nearly at the first Sunday in Advent; a good reminder, though, of the need to prepare ourselves for the feast of the nativity. Once upon a time the Church took over a pagan time and Christianised it; I am tempted to thing that the reverse has happened; have you tried finding a Christian Christmas card in an ordinary shop? All mine come from online Christian sources, and just as well, as I can’t find many in my local shops. It may be a bit cheesy to say that ‘Jesus is the reason for the season’, but on this one a good helping of cheese seems needed. I don’t know about you, but I feel the need for something of a spiritual ‘detox’ in the lead up to Christmas. I have friends (all women of course) who are on a physical ‘detox (for which read diet) for Christmas in the hope they can fit into their best party clothes; I feel I need the spiritual equivalent so that I am ready for the celebration of the miracle of the Incarnation.
I’ve been enjoying Geoffrey’s series on the portrayal of John and Peter in St John’s Gospel. As they are the two Apostles I admire the most, I am delighted at the idea that some of the scholars have got it wrong. I am never sure about this idea of ‘communities’ in the early Church, but I like the way Geoffrey has taken it to say something useful; I hope he will consider this an open invitation to do the same again.
I was puzzled by some of the discussions about ‘demons’, but then I have never taken much time to study this. There has been a long tradition of exorcism in the Church, East and West, so I see no great need to dissent.
I have been meaning to blog on women bishops and on the Pilling report in the Church of England, but have nothing new to say on the former, and Chalcedon451 intends to deal with the latter, so I shall leave off until he has had his say.
I know that some of you find the series ‘Calling all bloggers’ a good aid to sleep, but I am rather enjoying it. Nicholas provided an unexpected twist, and it may be a bit naughty to say someone is dead and then that they aren’t, but it adds to the suspense – for those of us not asleep. I await Geoffrey’s next instalment with interest – and the hope that I get the next go.
I hope that the run-up to Christmas will allow all of us some time to remember what all the fuss is about, not in a way that stops other forms of enjoyment, but in one which helps us all to enjoy it all the more.
I have asked Chalcedon451 to continue his Gospel reflections for the Advent season, and despite the many other demands on his time, he has agreed. I want to offer some reflections of my own across the coming weeks, partly as a way of getting myself into the place I want to be.
As part of this, I wonder if, as an Advent gift to us all, we might have a moratorium on fake ‘Holy Fathers’ and the like? Jokes sometimes wear thin, and it seems, from some of the comments, that that is the case now. AATW remains a place where all contributors may say what they like, but, I hope, one in which we also respect others enough to have our bit of fun and move on.
I hope we all have a holy and contemplative Advent so we may be ready to receive the Christ Child once more in our hearts, with thanksgiving.
Wise words Jess.
A new year beckons: a very happy new year to all! (liturgical year, of course)
Perhaps I can flag up this interesting article here:
http://www.ncregister.com/blog/edward-pentin/full-text-of-benedict-xvis-letter-to-atheist-odifreddi
In particular, might I quote the pope emeritus here:
“An important function of theology is to keep religion tied to reason and reason to religion. Both roles are of essential importance for humanity.”
Good will to all as we approach this special time of year. I will spend all day at church tomorrow….a morning Eucharist (I have the honour to read the epistle), and an evening advent carol service.
S.
LikeLike
Thank you for the link Struans – and what a lovely quotation 🙂
A happy new Christian year to us all 🙂 xx
LikeLike
A terrific letter by a most extraordinary modern thinker, Struans. Thanks for that. I miss his insights very much.
LikeLike
It is rather good, isn’t it? I haven’t really been following him since his ‘retirement’, but I don’t think he’s issued much by way of writings since then. It shows that his mind, whilst maybe aging, is still sharp. I picked up on that quote deliberately….saving it for another day for when I step back into the fray about the issues that Jess mentions above, and on which C might very soon be commenting.
Here’s another article that I came across recently, by a RC, which I found interesting in the way that teaching is pictures as changeable, around a core of the faith that is not so. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2010/nov/27/pope-condoms-catholic
Thoughts?
LikeLike
Hmm, thoughts.
I guess I would say that she has a much more liberal view on some of these issues than do I though she is entitled to them as the sexual and gender issues have never been infallibly defined. That said, there is sound theology for our present moral teaching on both and it will take a very imaginative and convincing bit of theology to evolve the present belief into something different.
LikeLike
Really? Wow. That is a revelation to me. Sexual and gender issues have never been infallibly defined? I have learnt something today. 🙂 If you’re able to expound a little more on that, I’d be fascinated to read it. 🙂 Genuinely so.
LikeLike
My meaning is that ex-cathedra statements by Popes (except for women in the priesthood) and proclamations from a Council on these issues do not exist. The closest thing we have which could be called infallible is contained in the Papal Encyclical Humanae Vitae which upheld our teaching on sexuality (condoms and the like). So what has from time immemorial the Church has consistently taught what we hold today as moral teaching on these. So much so, that it was never an issue of importance that required a Council or a Papal ex-cathedra statement. That may need be addressed soon with a clear statement now that people place far less authority in our Tradition (and many unspoken truths – understood inherently by everyone formerly) as we did in the past.
LikeLike
Semper Eadem. Well, we shall see.
I can understand Humanae Vitae, as the teleology of your church makes it so. In fact, that is where the error lies, to pinpoint the issue to which I object (and many others, I might add). At some point, unless another gets there first, I will return to that. This is particularly the reason that I highlighted that quote above from Benedict.
Thanks for the comments….but I have to go now.
S.
LikeLike
Well, I think Humae Vitae was expanded in the Theology of the Body by JPII and needs to others to build upon his theological foundation so that we can definitively go “on record” with infallible statements (which, for Catholics such as myself, seem self evident though many like yourself do not).
LikeLike
Very wise, indeed. From first to last, not that we’d expect any less, dearest friend.
Happy Advent to all and to all a Good Morning 🙂
LikeLike
Thank you, dearest friend 🙂 xx
LikeLike
Very welcome, dearest friend 🙂 xx
LikeLike
Nice to be appreciated 🙂 xx
LikeLike
Weeell, you certainly are here! 🙂 xx
LikeLike
🙂 xx
LikeLike
🙂 xx
LikeLike
Your thoughts about “I hope that the run-up to Christmas will allow all of us some time to remember what all the fuss is about, not in a way that stops other forms of enjoyment, but in one which helps us all to enjoy it all the more.” are well said.
It also is a reminder to me to stay off a leading social media website during the season because of all the ranting that takes place.
Blessings (and Regards)
Jim
LikeLike
Thank you Jim 🙂 xx
LikeLike
No gentiler a soul have i ever encounterd. Good sister Jess your wish is my command.
LikeLike
You’re a gentleman Bosco; thank you 🙂 xx
LikeLike