Tags
Thus far we have shown that Jesus wrote no book, but that he established a Church. That Church kept the traditions He established, his disciples spread His message, some in writing, some through their disciples, and some in both ways. Those disciples clearly wrote about Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as Our Lord had told them to when they baptised; their disciples did the same thing. To say, as Mushtaq does, that Jesus and the Apostles never talked about ‘three’ is incorrect, as my previous posts have show conclusively.
Lest Mustaq doubt that, let us take some of the passages which St Athanasius, St Cyril of Alexandria and the Cappadocian Fathers wrestled with in order to help us understand how the Trinity is God.
- John 1:1-18 – Jesus Christ as the divine word/logos, the light and life of the world, the “only-begotten Son” of the Father
- John 5:17-19 – “But Jesus answered them, ‘My Father is still working, and I also am working.’ / For this reason the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because he was not only breaking the sabbath, but was also calling God his own Father, thereby making himself equal to God. / Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, the Son can do nothing on his own, but only what he sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise.’ “
- John 10:30, 38 – “The Father and I are one.” / “…the Father is in me and I am in the Father.”
- John 14:8-11a – “Philip said to him, ‘Lord, show us the Father, and we will be satisfied.’ / Jesus said to him, ‘Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and you still do not know me? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? / Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works. / Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me…’ “
- John 17:1b-5 – “Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son so that the Son may glorify you, / since you have given him authority over all people, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him. / And this is eternal life, that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you have sent. / I glorified you on earth by finishing the work that you gave me to do. / So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed.”
In the light of these quotations, for Mushtaq to write:
Did Blessed Jesus hear and speak term Trinity, or its definition {Trinity formula = Father is full and complete God, Son is full and complete God, Holy Spirit is full and complete God, but these are not three gods, but One full and complete God} or even Number “three” to tell about exact number of persons in Triune God? Answer is No.
is wrong. Jesus told us to baptise in the Three Names and spoke repeatedly of the Father and Himself being one, as well as of the coming of the Paraclete. It was the search to fully understand this which occupied some of the finest Christian minds of the first three centuries after the Resurrection of Jesus. The notion that there was no ‘orthodoxy’ before that, and that someone who believed God to be a monad was somehow ‘orthodox’ is simply incorrect. So the answer to Mushtaq’s statement that the Unitarians can be considered orthodox is that it is wrong. Who says? That Church founded by Christ. To seek to quote its own book against it as though it is not the authorised interpreter of the Apostolic deposit is, again, incorrect for the reasons given.
In a final post, I will attempt to dispose of Mushtaq’s remaining caveats.
Jess wrote: “In the light of these quotations, for Mushtaq to write: …. is wrong. Jesus told us to baptise in the Three Names”
Jess – just a small point that may help:
We are told to baptise in the name (singular) of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, this may then imply a compound name for the Godhead. This actually increases the concept of unity (oneness) between the three. We are not instructed to baptise in three names.
Also when an act is carried on in another’s name it can carry the meaning of completing the act in the authority of that person, which is what I think the text intends to say here. So this instruction of Jesus to the church in my opinion also carries the meaning of – “make disciples baptising them in the authority of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit”. That the authority of one is equal to the others and they are mentioned together in this way is evidence of the divinity of each.
Mushtaq seems to have some knowledge of various Christian sects and mentioned the ‘Pentecostal Oneness group’ also known as ‘Jesus only’.
These people believe that Jesus is the totality of the Godhead and the Holy Spirit is only a force exercised by God. This does not fit all the scriptures. The chief reasoning of such ‘Oneness’ people is that consistently throughout the book of Acts we read that the disciples baptised converts in the name of Jesus (which is the practice of the Pentecostal Oneness Church).
As the first disciples received their orders to baptise directly from Jesus it is most likely that the meaning of the Acts references is that they baptised in the authority of Jesus while using the Father, Son, Spirit triad formula they had been commanded to use by Jesus.
This reply may serve as a knock down for another minority Unitarian sect proposed by Mushtaq.
Comments welcomed (Rob)
LikeLike
Thank you Rob.
Yes, I agree. I was,of course, showing Mushtaq that Jesus used the three names, something Mustaq denied. the most common heresy,of which Islam partakes,is the idea that any one of the three Persons is God.
His quotation that .The Father is Complete God,the Son is Complete God and the Spirit is complete God’ is part of his confusion. The word we use us ‘True’ God – not ‘complete’.
LikeLike
Hi Jess I have a few questions:
Where do I find Mushtaq’s summary so that I can address his point 8 to 11
Sometimes my photo does not appear on my posts, why is this? Not that I’m over enamored with my ageing image LOL
Is it policy here to re-blog a post from another writer I have one I would like to post?
Thanks Rob
LikeLike
Rob – M’s responses are here:
https://jessicahof.wordpress.com/dialogue-with-a-muslim/
Not sure why your image does not appear, but will investigate. Jess x
LikeLike
You cant talk catholics from getting off their knees from befor idols just like you cant talk a muslim from being a muslim.
LikeLike
Could be, Bosco, but I am just trying to show him why we believe what we do 🙂
LikeLike
Fabulous article !
LikeLike
Pingback: Witnesses for Christ | Quality of Life Ministries
Dialogue with a Muslim friend: Blessed Jesus & Trinity
TABLE OF CONTENTS (TOC # 3) –
TOC Title = Dialogue with a Muslim friend: Blessed Jesus & Trinity (3C)
TOC Date: 06 Oct 2013
Dialogue between: Muhummad Mushtaq Tariq and Jessica Hoff
TOC Author: Muhummad Mushtaq Tariq
TOC compression ratio: 9 pages compressed to 2 pages (4.5:1)
1-JESSICA:
Thus far we have shown that . . . ?
1-MUSHTAQ:
read her previous articles answered by me
2-JESSICA:
John 1:1-18 – Blessed Jesus Christ as the divine word/logos . . . ?
2-MUSHTAQ:
I have following three answers:
Answer 1: (If Trinity formula of 4th century is basic requirement of salvation then St Athanasius is heretic of 4th century)
Answer 2: (Logos is a pagan Greek term, not teaching of Prophets)
Answer 3: (Blessed Jesus is not the only begotten Son of God)
3-JESSICA:
John 5:17-19 – My Father is still working, and I also am working . . . ?
3-MUSHTAQ: (Working of father or Son doesn’t mean Trinity.)
4-JESSICA:
John 10:30, 38 – “The Father and I are one.”
4-MUSHTAQ: (God and Blessed Jesus are not one in Trinity)
5-JESSICA:
John 14:8-11a – Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. . . ?
5-MUSHTAQ: (Nobody can see God)
6-JESSICA:
John 17:1b-5 – the only true God, and Blessed Jesus Christ whom you have sent. . . ?
6-MUSHTAQ: (Blessed Jesus is the messenger sent by God)
7-JESSICA:
Blessed Jesus told us to baptise in the Three Names . . . ?
7-MUSHTAQ:
I have following three answers:
Answer 1: (Unitarian Christians have correct meanings of father, son and holy Spirit)
Answer 2: (Mark 16:9-20 has been expunged in many Bibles)
Answer 3: (Real meaning of Paraclete)
8-JESSICA:
… search to fully understand God occupied some of the finest Christian minds of the first three centuries after the Resurrection of Blessed Jesus. . . ?
8-MUSHTAQ: (List of 37 triple deities / triads in pagans)
It was the search for pagan triad / triple deity into Christianity which occupied some of the finest Christian minds of the first three centuries (Note, not of Blessed Jesus times) to invent trinity…
END OF TOC
1-JESSICA:
Thus far we have shown that Blessed Jesus wrote no book, but that he established a Church. That Church kept the traditions He established, his disciples spread His message, some in writing, some through their disciples, and some in both ways. Those disciples clearly wrote about Father, Son and Holy Spirit, as Our Lord had told them to when they baptised; their disciples did the same thing. To say, as Mushtaq does, that Blessed Jesus and the Apostles never talked about ‘three’ is incorrect, as my previous posts have show conclusively.
1-MUSHTAQ:
Thank you Madam Jessica for your article that you wrote for me.
However, if readers want to see reality of these claims what Madam Jessica “has shown”, then please read her previous articles answered by me. Here I don’t want to repeat same stuff.
I have replied each and every point raised by Madam Jessica in previous articles, response is awaited from Madam Jessica, and therefore, now there is no need to repeat my answers here. Now we shall discuss this article at hand.
2-JESSICA:
Lest Mushtaq doubt that, let us take some of the passages which St Athanasius, St Cyril of Alexandria and the Cappadocian Fathers wrestled with in order to help us understand how the Trinity is God.
John 1:1-18 – Blessed Jesus Christ as the divine word/logos, the light and life of the world, the “only-begotten Son” of the Father.
2-MUSHTAQ:
I have following three answers:
Answer 1: (If Trinity formula of 4th century is basic requirement of salvation then St Athanasius is heretic of 4th century)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 007 – Al-A’râf. Verse 202.
Their brethren plunge them further into ERROR and cease not.
St Athanasius and St Cyril are not superior to Blessed Jesus and Prophets. How can they wrestle with each other to forge concept of God untold and unheard by Blessed Jesus?. Is this formula i.e. Concept of God (Father is full and complete God, Son is full and complete God and Holy Spirit is full and complete God, but there are not three gods, but one full and complete God) a basic requirement of salvation? If yes, then Church of first century and even disciples of Blessed Jesus may not get salvation as they didn’t speak and hear this formula, it is of course incorrect, Blessed Jesus is Prophet, St Athanasius is not Prophet. If no, then it is useless and even heretic to add such words about concept of God undefined by Prophets and Blessed Jesus. It proves that if Trinity formula of 4th century is basic requirement of salvation then St Athanasius is heretic of 4th century.
Answer 2: (Logos is a pagan Greek term, not teaching of Prophets)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 021 – Al-Anbiyâ. Verse 54.
He said: Verily ye and your fathers were in plain ERROR.
Logos is a pagan Greek term, not teaching of Prophets from Adam till Moses. Lets study Logos:
Logos is an important term in philosophy, psychology, rhetoric, and religion. Originally a word meaning “a ground”, “a plea”, “an opinion”, “an expectation”, “word,” “speech,” “account,” “reason,” it became a technical term in philosophy, beginning with Heraclitus (ca. 535–475 BC), who used the term for a principle of order and knowledge.
Ancient philosophers used the term in different ways. The sophists used the term to mean discourse, and Aristotle applied the term to refer to “reasoned discourse” or “the argument” in the field of rhetoric. The Stoic philosophers identified the term with the divine animating principle pervading the Universe.
Under Hellenistic Judaism, Philo (ca. 20 BC–AD 50) adopted the term into Jewish philosophy. The Gospel of John identifies the Logos, through which all things are made, as divine (theos), and further identifies Blessed Jesus as the incarnate Logos.
Answer 3: (Blessed Jesus is not the only begotten Son of God)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 023 – Al-Mu’minûn. Verse 54.
So leave them in their ERROR till a time.
Long before Blessed Jesus was born, God said to David (Psalm 2.7): “I will declare the decree: the Lord hath said unto me (David), Thou art My son; this day have I begotten thee.” So David is also God’s begotten son, and he was before Blessed Jesus. It proves Blessed Jesus is not the only begotten Son of God, as Madam Jessica claims here.
3-JESSICA:
John 5:17-19 – “But Blessed Jesus answered them, ‘My Father is still working, and I also am working.’ / For this reason the Jews were seeking all the more to kill him, because he was not only breaking the sabbath, but was also calling God his own Father, thereby making himself equal to God. / Blessed Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, the Son can do nothing on his own, but only what he sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, the Son does likewise.’ “
3-MUSHTAQ: (Working of father or Son doesn’t mean Trinity.)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 002 – Al-Baqarah. Verse 170.
And when it is said unto them: Follow that which Allah hath revealed, they say: We follow that wherein we found our FATHERs. What! Even though their FATHERs were wholly unintelligent and had no guidance?
If anybody is working along his own father? Then does it mean that they are forming one unit? Answer is no. Working of father or Son doesn’t mean Trinity. Blessed Jesus here is telling his obedience to God, Blessed Jesus is not claiming here his Second membership in Triune God.
Blessed Jesus had not human father, also, Adam had not human father, Blessed Jesus is calling God his father in the meaning of Creator, Adam is called Son of God in Bible, so Son of God is not used here in meanings of any member of Triune God.
Adam lacked both father and mother and Adam is also called son of God in Luke 3:38: “Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God”.
4-JESSICA:
John 10:30, 38 – “The Father and I are one.” / “…the Father is in me and I am in the Father.”
4-MUSHTAQ: (God and Blessed Jesus are not one in Trinity)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 002 – Al-Baqarah. Verse 163.
Your GOD is One GOD; there is no GOD save Him, the Beneficent, the Merciful.
Since you ignored my Summary #1 to respond in an organized sequence, and instead choose random way of Dialogue, that’s why you are repeating same verses again, so I have to repeat those answers STILL UNANSWERED by you.
But God and Blessed Jesus are one (John 14:11): “Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me.”
Read then John 17:21. “That they (the disciples) all art in one; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they may also be art in one…”
It is clear here that God and Blessed Jesus are one, but also that the disciples are one in Blessed Jesus and God. If Blessed Jesus is God because he is in God, why are the disciples then not God, as they all are like Blessed Jesus also in God? If God, Blessed Jesus and the Holy Ghost form one unit of Trinity, then with the disciples included they should form a God unit of fifteen. You see if one reads the context in which this is spoken, then one will realise that God, Blessed Jesus and the disciples are one in purpose. i.e. to save humanity from the darkness of disbelief, idol worship and of enslavement to human beings. Suppose that I am a medical doctor, and my father and my grandfather are medical doctors, and I say, “We are all one”. Anyone who reads or hears this in its proper context will realise that “in profession we are one,” not that we are joined in one unit of creation. Each one is a separate entity and therefore we are three separate persons.
5-JESSICA:
John 14:8-11a – “Philip said to him, ‘Lord, show us the Father, and we will be satisfied.’ / Blessed Jesus said to him, ‘Have I been with you all this time, Philip, and you still do not know me? Whoever has seen me has seen the Father. How can you say, ‘Show us the Father’? / Do you not believe that I am in the Father and the Father is in me? The words that I say to you I do not speak on my own; but the Father who dwells in me does his works. / Believe me that I am in the Father and the Father is in me…’ “
5-MUSHTAQ: (Nobody can see God)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 002 – Al-Baqarah. Verse 133.
Or were ye present when death came to Jacob, when he said unto his sons: What will ye worship after me? They said: We shall worship thy GOD, the GOD of thy fathers, Abraham and Ishmael and Isaac, One GOD, and unto Him we have surrendered.
Since you ignored my Summary #1 to respond in an organized sequence, and instead choose random way of Dialogue, that’s why you are repeating same verses again, so I have to repeat those answers STILL UNANSWERED by you.
But Blessed Jesus is God according to John 14:9: “… he that hath seen me hath seen the Father.”
See to the context again. What is before and after this: (John 14:8): “Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us.” (John 14:9): “Blessed Jesus saith unto him, I have been so long a time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip?
He that hath seen me hast seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, shew us the Father?”
Blessed Jesus explained to Philip. You should believe in God by admiring His creation: the sun, the moon, themselves and all the other beautiful creation of God, and Blessed Jesus himself who was created by God. Blessed Jesus said (John 4:24): “God is a Spirit. (John 5:37): “ . . . ye have neither heard His voice at any time, nor seen His shape.” So how can you see a spirit then? What they saw was Blessed Jesus and not God. Also Paul said (I Timothy 6:16): “… whom no man hath seen, nor can see . . .” So what you can see with your eyes can never be God.
6-JESSICA:
John 17:1b-5 – “Father, the hour has come; glorify your Son so that the Son may glorify you, / since you have given him authority over all people, to give eternal life to all whom you have given him. / And this is eternal life that they may know you, the only true God, and Blessed Jesus Christ whom you have sent. / I glorified you on earth by finishing the work that you gave me to do. / So now, Father, glorify me in your own presence with the glory that I had in your presence before the world existed.”
6-MUSHTAQ: (Blessed Jesus is the messenger sent by God)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 043 – Az-Zukhruf. Verse 63.
When BLESSED JESUS came with clear proofs (of Allah’s sovereignty), he said: I have come unto you with wisdom, and to make plain some of that concerning which ye differ. So keep your duty to Allah, and obey me.
Here Blessed Jesus is telling that he is the one who was sent by God. It means he is a messenger, separated from God and sent by God. Since God doesn’t send himself. Here Blessed Jesus further mentions to glorify and praise God, he does not mention here that God is three persons, and Son is related to my body with this relation, or some such relation that you cannot understand.
7-JESSICA:
In the light of these quotations, for Mushtaq to write:
Did Blessed Jesus hear and speak term Trinity, or its definition {Trinity formula = Father is full and complete God, Son is full and complete God, Holy Spirit is full and complete God, but these are not three gods, but One full and complete God} or even Number “three” to tell about exact number of persons in Triune God? Answer is No.
is wrong. Blessed Jesus told us to baptise in the Three Names and spoke repeatedly of the Father and Himself being one, as well as of the coming of the Paraclete.
7-MUSHTAQ:
I have following three answers:
Answer 1: (Unitarian Christians have correct meanings of father, son and holy Spirit)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 005 – Al-Mâ’idah. Verse 78.
Those of the children of Israel who went astray were cursed by the tongue of David, and of BLESSED JESUS, son of Mary. That was because they rebelled and used to transgress.
Baptise in name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit doesn’t mean baptize in name of three persons of Trinity or three members of Triune God. Since Bible uses Father in meaning of Creator, Son in meaning of Loved One, and Holy Spirit in meaning of angel. In absence of any verse in Bible defining Father as first member of Triune God, or first person of Trinity, meaning of Father must be taken from context where it is used in meanings of Creator and Master, never as first member of Triune God. Blessed Jesus himself never ordered baptize in name of three persons of Trinity, therefore, correct meaning of Baptize in name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit is the meaning understood by Unitarian Christians, not that understood by pagans of fourth centuries.
Answer 2: (Mark 16:9-20 has been expunged in many Bibles)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 005 – Al-Mâ’idah. Verse 78.
Those of the children of Israel who went astray were cursed by the tongue of David, and of BLESSED JESUS, son of Mary. That was because they rebelled and used to transgress.
Let’s discuss in detail Matthew 28:19 as quoted by Madam Jessica.
Blessed Jesus himself said that he was sent only to the house of Israel. (Matthew 15:24): “I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.” Also (Matthew 1:21): “And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name Blessed Jesus; for he shall save his people from their sins.” (i.e. the Jews). Blessed Jesus also said that he came not to make changes but to fulfill the Law. (Matthew 5:17-18): “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets; I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, not one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” In Chapter 61.v6 of the Qur’an it states emphatically that Blessed Jesus came to the Jews.
But in Mark 16:15 Blessed Jesus said, “Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature.”
This contradicts what is mentioned above in Matthew 15:24 and Matthew 1:21. Very Important: Mark 16:9-20 has been expunged in many Bibles. The New American Standard Bible put this part in brackets and wrote the following commentary:
“Some of the oldest manuscripts omit Matthew verses 9 through 20.” The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures used by Christians admits that certain ancient manuscripts add a long conclusion or a short conclusion after Mark 16:8 but some omit it entirely. The Revised Standard version prints the following footnote: “Some of the most ancient authorities bring the book to a close at the end of verse 8:” This means also that the resurrection is not true as this is described in Mark 16:9.
But Blessed Jesus said in Matthew 28:19: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations.”
“All nations” must be explained as “all the twelve tribes of Israel;” otherwise it contradicts Matthew 15:24 and Matthew 1:21. In the New American Standard Bible and the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures it is not translated as “all nations” of the world, but as “all the nations,” which means “the twelve tribes of Israel.”
Answer 3: (Real meaning of Paraclete)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 061 – As-Saff. Verse 6.
And when BLESSED JESUS son of Mary said: O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a messenger who cometh after me, whose name is the Praised One. Yet when be hath come unto them with clear proofs, they say: This is mere magic.
You wrote: Blessed Jesus told us coming of the Paraclete.
What is Paraclete?
In the Greek New Testament the word “Paraclete” is a mysterious word whose exact meaning no one knows. Paraclete appears in the Gospel of John (14:16, 14:26, 15:26, 16:7) where it may be translated into English as “counselor”, “helper”, encourager, advocate, or “comforter”, “Holy Spirit”, “Spirit of God”, Spirit of Truth’, Lightful Spirit of God Almighty, Holy Breath, Almighty Breath, Giver of Life, Lord of Grace, Supporter.
In the Gospel of Matthew, chapter 5 v. 4 Blessed Jesus Christ uses the verb, paraclethesontai, traditionally interpreted to signify “to be refreshed, encouraged, or comforted”. The text may also be translated as vocative as well as the traditional nominative.[9] Then the meaning of ‘paraclethesontai’, also informative of the meaning of the name, or noun Paraclete, implicates ‘are going to summon’ or ‘will be breaking off’… The Paraclete may thus mean ‘the summoner’ or ‘the one, who, or that which makes free’
In 1 John 2:1 “Paraclete” is used to describe the intercessory role of Blessed Jesus Christ who pleads to The Father on our behalf. And in John 14:16 Blessed Jesus says “another Paraclete” will come to help his disciples, implying Blessed Jesus is the first and primary Paraclete.
Summing up all above, it is clear that there are lots of meanings of Paraclete available, whihc one is the exact true meaning, nobody knows.
Many Muslim writers have argued that “another Paraclete” (John 14:16)—the first being Blessed Jesus—refers to Muhammad. The earliest scholar is probably Ibn Ishaq (died 767), who Islamic tradition states was the grandson of a Christian. Others who interpreted the paraclete as a reference to Muhammad include Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Kathir, Al-Qurtubi, Rahmatullah Kairanawi (1818-1891), and contemporary Muslim scholars such as Martin Lings. A few Muslim commentators, such as David Benjamin Keldani (1928), have argued that the original Greek word used was periklytos, meaning famed, illustrious, or praiseworthy, rendered in Arabic as Ahmad, and that this was substituted by Christians with parakletos.
Quran: Surah/Chapter 061 – As-Saff. Verse 6.
And when BLESSED JESUS son of Mary said: O Children of Israel! Lo! I am the messenger of Allah unto you, confirming that which was (revealed) before me in the Torah, and bringing good tidings of a messenger who cometh after me, whose name is the Praised One. Yet when be hath come unto them with clear proofs, they say: This is mere magic.
8-JESSICA:
It was the search to fully understand this which occupied some of the finest Christian minds of the first three centuries after the Resurrection of Blessed Jesus. The notion that there was no ‘orthodoxy’ before that, and that someone who believed God to be a monad was somehow ‘orthodox’ is simply incorrect. So the answer to Mushtaq’s statement that the Unitarians can be considered orthodox is that it is wrong. Who says? That Church founded by Christ. To seek to quote its own book against it as though it is not the authorised interpreter of the Apostolic deposit is, again, incorrect for the reasons given.
In a final post, I will attempt to dispose of Mushtaq’s remaining caveats.
8-MUSHTAQ: (LIST OF 37 TRIPLE DEITIES / TRIADS IN PAGANS)
Quran: Surah/Chapter 005 – Al-Mâ’idah. Verse 73.
They surely disbelieve who say: Lo! Allah is the third of three; when there is no GOD save the One GOD. If they desist not from so saying a painful doom will fall on those of them who disbelieve.
It was the search for pagan triad / triple deity into Christianity which occupied some of the finest Christian minds of the first three centuries (Note, not of Blessed Jesus times) to invent trinity.
LIST OF 37 TRIPLE DEITIES / TRIADS IN PAGANS:
The Classical Greek triads:
(1)The Classical Greek Olympic triad of Zeus (king of the gods), Athena (goddess of war and intellect) and Apollo (god of the sun, culture and music).
(2) The Delian chief triad of Leto (mother), Artemis (daughter) and Apollo (son) and (3) second Delian triad of Athena, Zeus and Hera
(4) The Olympian demiurgic triad in platonic philosophy, made up of Zeus (considered the Zeus [king of the gods] of the Heavens), Poseidon (Zeus of the seas) and Pluto (mythology)/Hades (Zeus of the underworld), all considered in the end to be a monad and the same Zeus, and the Titanic demiurgic triad of Helios (sun when in the sky), Apollo (sun seen in our world) and Dionysus (god of mysteries, “sun” of the underworld) (as can be seen on Plato’s Phaed on the myth Dionysus and the Titans)
The ancient Egypt Triads:
(5) Osiris (husband), Isis (wife), and Horus (son),
(6) the Theban triad of Amun, Mut and Khonsu
(7) the Memphite triad of Ptah, Sekhmet and Nefertem
(8) the Elephantine triad of Khnum (god of the source of the Nile river), Satet (the personification of the floods of the Nile river), and Anuket (the Goddess of the nile river).
(9) the sungod Ra, whose form in the morning was Kheper, at noon Re-Horakhty and in the evening Atum, and many others.
The Hellenistic Egypt Triads:
(10)Triad of Isis, Alexandrian Serapis and Harpocrates (a Hellenized version of the already referred Isis-Osiris-Horus triad), though in the early Ptolemaic period Serapis, Isis and Apollo (who was though sometimes identified with Horus) were preferred
(11) The Roman Capitoline Triad of Jupiter (father), Juno (wife), and Minerva (daughter)
(12) The Roman pleibian triad of Ceres, Liber Pater and Libera (or its Greek counterpart with Demeter, Dionysos and Kore)
The Julian triads of the early Roman Principate:
(13) Venus Genetrix, Divus Iulius, and Clementia Caesaris
(14) Divus Iulius, Divi filius and Genius Augusti
(15) Eastern variants of the Julian triad, e.g. in Asia Minor: Dea Roma, Divus Iulius and Genius Augusti (or Divi filius)
(16) The Matres (Deae Matres/Dea Matrona) in Roman mythology
(17) The Fates, Moirai or Furies in Greek and Roman mythology:
(18) Clotho or Nona the Spinner, Lachesis or Decima the Weaver, and Atropos or Morta the Cutter of the Threads of Life. One’s Lifeline was Spun by Clotho, Woven into the tapestry of Life by Lachesis, and the thread Cut by Atropos.
(19) The Hooded Spirits or Genii Cucullati in Gallo-Roman times
(20) The main supranational triad of the ancient Lusitanian mythology and religion and Portuguese Neopagans made up of the couple Arentia and Arentius and Quangeius and Trebaruna, followed by a minor (21) Gallaecian-Lusitanian triad of Bandua (under many natures), Nabia and Reve female nature: Reva
(22) The sisters Uksáhkká, Juksáhkká and Sáhráhkká in Sámi mythology.
(23) The triad of Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat in the time of Mohammed (Holy Qu’ran (Abdullah Yusuf Ali translation), Surah 53:19-22)
(24) Lugus (Esus, Toutatis and Taranis) in Celtic mythology
(25) Odin, Vili and Ve in Norse mythology
The Norns in Norse mythology
(26)The Triglav in Slavic mythology
(27) Perkūnas (god of heaven), Patrimpas (god of earth) and Pikuolis (god of death) in Prussian mythology
(28) The Zorya or Auroras in Slavic mythology
(29)The Charites or Graces in Greek mythology
(30) The One, the Thought (or Intellect) and the Soul in Neoplatonism
(31)Ayyavazhi Trinity
(32) Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva (Trimurti) in Puranic Hinduism
(33) Lord Dattatreya
Fu Lu Shou in Taoism
(34) Mitra, Indra, and Varuna in early vedic Hinduism
(35) Saha Realm Trinity in Mahayana Buddhism (Shakyamuni, Avalokitesvara and Ksitigarbha)
(36) Shakti, Lakshmi, and Saraswati (Tridevi) in Puranic Hinduism
(37) Three Pure Ones in Taoism
Father + Son + Holy Spirit = Triad is not there in first commandment of Moses, but in pagan teachings.
Christianity, therefore, When any Prophet from Adam till Moses and Blessed Jesus never speak and hear number “three” to teach concept of God, from where this “three” came? Some of the Finest Christian minds of first three centuries and not disciples and people of Blessed Jesus times, came to conclusion that God is three persons, they did so under influence of dozen of triad stories of idolaters, not under influence of monotheistic, anti-idol prophets. Their other motive was to attract triple deity pagan worshipper into Christianity.
In the end, I thank to Madam Jessica for participating in a friendly and respectful Christian Muslim Dialogue, I am sure that readers of this Christian Muslim Dialogue will also have learnt some truth about the two greatest religions of the world i.e. Christianity and Islam.
Regards,
Muhummad Mushtaq Tariq
LikeLike
Pingback: Answering Mushtaq: St John | All Along the Watchtower
Mushtaq: you have been provided with copious Biblical and other authoritative evidences of the trinity that you fail to engage with. Rather you frequently misrepresent the Christian understanding and repeat the same assertions. I repeat only:
Jesus’ command to baptise in the (singular) name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit is an obvious reference to the authority of one God in Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
Following much discussion of the meaning of the term ‘Paraclete’ in an attempt to obscure the identity of the Holy Spirit Mushtaq wrote:
Summing up all above, it is clear that there are lots of meanings of Paraclete available, which one is the exact true meaning, nobody knows.
Luke the writer of the NT book of Acts in AD 64 was however absolutely clear on the identity of the Holy Spirit when speaking of Him Luke say:
“You have not lied to man but to GOD”
The Quran mistakenly takes the angel Gabriel for the Holy Spirit however when Gabriel is mentioned in the Bible NT he is named and not confused with the Holy Spirit.
LikeLike
Christian scriptures teach us that error comes from the doctrines of demons. You teach us nothing by listing a host of pagan trinities, which we all know of and attribute to ‘doctrines of demons’. However I wonder what leads you to think these invented trinities have any relevance to the issue.
It makes more sense to me that the demons in presenting false gods have attempted to provide trinitarian imitations of the real thing. But in the end your reference to pagan trinities is irrelevant and proves nothing.
LikeLike