Tags
My generation has the dubious honour of having seen, in its lifetime, a passage from a Christian to a post-Christian society. When I was a lad the local clergyman was a respected figure (even if you weren’t one of his flock), people expected to go to church or chapel on Sunday (even if they didn’t get there as often as they should), which was a day of rest when most of the shops were closed. Our legal system was soundly based on a framework of Christian ethics. Divorce was infrequent, abortion something which if it happened, did so in the dark corners of society.
What happened in these last cases illustrates a wider problem. There were couples who lived lives of real misery because of the difficulty of divorcing; there were lasses who died because of back street abortionists. In an effort, they said, to solve these problems, liberal-minded men like David Steel and Roy Jenkins pioneered changes in these things. We were told, on the abortion issue, for example, that there would be many safeguards; there were, and are, but everyone knows we effectively have abortion on demand in this country. In place of the problem of some couples living lives of misery, we now have many more, and their children, being damaged by the divorce rate. Could it really be said that our last state is better than our first? or have we (literally) thrown out the baby with the bath water?
These changes were put forward with good motives, and incrementally. But their effect has been to create a society very different from one anyone said they wished to create.
The reasons for the de-Christianisation of our society in the UK are complex, but it would be very hard not to ask the churches and chapels what they’ve been doing all this while? Part of the answer seems to have been ‘going along with it so as to seem relevant’. That is a trahaison des clercs.
The role of the churches is to proclaim the Gospel. Proclaim it in action by all means – what point is our faith if it produces nothing but sermons and books on theology? But we are also here to witness to society in another way – that is to declare there is a radically different way of being in this world. That involves talking about sin – which of course modern clerics seem (with some notable exceptions) to dislike.
The results of this failure are plain. Look at any urban landscape and you will see it littered with abandoned chapels and failed churches which are derelict and decaying. If you want to see the failure of our churches, look at their physical embodiments.
Yet could it really be said that this society needs the churches less than it did. I am involved, as I know Jessica is, in my local foodbank. Here my chapel, like other churches, plays a crucial role in a place where the State has failed. There are other such places – let us as Christians seize the opportunities. Despair is for sissies – not disciples of Christ.
Yes, and I think what you say here has much to do with why the clergy is not respected as they were in our youth. They have, in many cases, certainly not all, proved to be unworthy of respect.
A man (or woman) who is willing to stand up for their beliefs, even if they are wrong, is worthy of respect. But if you stand for nothing (to use the old and true cliche) you’ll fall for anything and are unworthy of respect, and will get none.
LikeLike
Yes, I agree. There are consequences to cowardice after all.
LikeLike
Agreed, All actions (and lack of action is, by definition, an action) have consequences.
LikeLike
This is interesting, in the Catholic Church whose went into Liberation theology which as an ideal was to serve the poor. But it got tangled into the world, and one of these aspects was violence. So you have the Churches teaching touching shoulders with the Marxist theory of serving the poor.
The rock we build on must be the principles of God not of man, since man’s principles are of sand. That has been the problem as I see it, man’s job is change the environment and the woman’s job is to change the man. We as the church has taken the large foolish job of changing the world by being in the world in a worldly way, instead we are to take the small job of changing a single man, then the next and the next. We remembered the world and forgot the primary mission of souls.
This is hard and takes a long time without any guarantee but that Jesus will be with us until the ending of the age.
Someone in Britain said, ”It is foolish to expect that Christianity to fail and that its ethics in a society will survive.
LikeLike